I think that in order to make that conclusion we should at least have a better knowledge of 1) what doctors think of Jenner's playing condition now and what it can be in the near future, and 2) how competitive they want the team to become for next season.
#2 is a certain answer - they want the club to be competitive as hell for next season! That's not saying they (or I) realistically expect to be competing for a PO spot, but that's what they want. They aren't planning next year to be a tank run for more ping pong balls.
#1 You never will get that information, neither will I. Obviously CBJ management and Boone have that information, albeit with no guaranty.
Someone (not you Tunnel) posted a response to my first post regarding Boone - suggesting that I re-check comparables. I specifically stated in my first post on Boone that I was NOT equating his value to any of the stud 1Cs in that list - none of those teams would trade their stud 1Cs for any haul. And yet the post I was responding to was proposing 5 picks, only 1 being a 1st, and late-round 1st at that.
My point was/is that Boone, in his current role and team-friendly contract (not a rental and still 29) is worth at least two 1st's plus a prospect. He's not a 35 year old, he's not going to be a UFA for several years. The picks we'd get back are 20+ picks coming from a contender - not as valuable as a 1st from some nebulous team that might be a top 10 pick (as pointed out by Major Major). And thus personally I wouldn't do that deal, but I understand that some would based on value.
My reason for not trading Boone isn't sentimental as much as is this: If you believe/hope that CBJ will be a contender in 2025-26, they will need a Boone. It's that type of player, a veteran, who can play up/down, who thrives when the game gets more physical, who make the difference in making a deep Cup run. That type of player is not going to get the CBJ to that level by himself, its' not a McDavid type player (who hasn't gotten his team to that level yet either) but such a player would be a prime difference maker in a PO run. My point is that CBJ already has that player (Boone himself) under a team-friendly contract for a few more years. If Boone gets hurt, that will be sad on so many levels, but would not be bad asset management. Any picks we'd get for him, even if they make it, are 3-4 years away from contributing to the NHL club. I'm stretching your argument a little, but if any player with a prior injury were to suffer an injury that long-term diminished their ability or was career-ending, in hindsight you would argue that the GM should have traded that player before they got injured? Every player is at risk of that type of injury, admittedly some more than others but Boone is the exact player, and likely will be that same player, that I'd want on a CBJ club that might be chasing playoffs in 2 years and chasing a deeper run in 3. If they don't make that progress as a team, it won't be because they failed to get picks for Boone, it will be for other reasons (kids not developing has hoped, injuries to others, regression by Laine/Gudreau, etc.).