Let me apologize in advance for the long winded response. I will try and keep it short.
1) I think Walsh has the best chance at an NHL future. Regula I'm not completely sold on but I haven't written him off just yet. Mitchell is the least likeliest of the three IMO. But you have to remember, outside of Boston they had one right shot d-man under contract with zero pro experience and Sweeney has two rosters to fill, Boston and Providence.
As for recouping picks, I have to breakdown how trades work. Don Sweeney does not call every GM himself. In fact, most deals are initiated between the AGM's and Director of Player Personnel before the GM's get involved. Most teams, including the Bruins designate people in the organization to be responsible for initiating conversations with specific teams. For example: Evan Gold may be responsible for the Atlantic division, Scott Bradley for the Pacific and so on. So they've had the conversations and as you know, some teams would not be able to make it work because of the cap, or needed the Bruins to take back salary and they couldn't... a bunch of different reasons, but they had the discussions. No one was offering what the fans wanted. Again, it's the cost of doing business. Does it suck? Probably, but everyone operates under the same rules.
2) Gryz's value. I've maintained my stance that the Bruins could get a second round pick for Gryz going back to the last trade deadline. Does it still hold true? I'm told yes. But I raised the question because it does hold some merit in past negotiations/trades around the league: Gryz's actual money owed is $4.2 million with only a $3.6 million cap hit. Yes, it may be peanuts, but history has shown that when a player's actual money owed is higher then his cap hit, it de-values him on the trade market. So, to answer your question I'm not sure how much an opposing GM is going to look at that.
Finally, I apologize if I said to trust Sweeney. I never want to force my opinion on anyone. Everyone here needs to make up their own minds. All I know is he is an NHL GM and I am not and only time will tell if he makes the right move or not.
Thanks for your feedback, I appreciate it.
As for the process, that stuff is very interesting, but also makes me wonder if any parts of that cog are not pulling their weight. I'd imagine they did their due diligence and moving Hall + Foligno for what sounds like C prospects at best, if that was the best deal, so be it. But it wouldn't be the first time after the fact you heard another GM say, "wow, I didn't know player x was available" and/or the price.
Gryz's value, I hope you are right, I still do think they need to recoup picks, but it's looking more and more likely we aren't going to be picking in the first 2 rounds. I mean if Hall gets table scraps (even with his cap hit)... just less optimistic about the return of other players.
I wasn't insinuating you were forcing your opinion at all! Everyone has a right to their own. I'm just a little more cautious with my trust. The success he's had hasn't resulted in a cup, (which most GM's can say), he's had his hits, he's had his misses. But overall, from a strictly asset point of view, Sweeney has sent A LOT of assets out over the years, with very little tangible roster players as of TODAY or and the future.
Hence, even getting the throw-in 4-7th round pick can turn into something, but if we couldn't even grab those?
In terms of roster, I felt like it was odd to move Hall for C level defense prospects when we already have so limited forwards signed. I know we are after centers, and room to sign forward depth. Sweeney's overfocus on D, especially LD has put us in a bad cap spot. I mean, easy to say as an arm-chair GM, but moving Hall for 2 NHL ready forward prospects (even with less upside) would have made a little more sense given the roster needs.
Anyways, that's just my two cents, and I appreciate your contribution/sharing either way!