Richie Daggers Crime
Boosted 9 times double masked they/them
But, if they don’t, and they took a lot of 4th liners, then you’re screwed.Protect Ebs, and expose Clutter or MM. Chances are, they take Bailey over the 4th liners.
But, if they don’t, and they took a lot of 4th liners, then you’re screwed.Protect Ebs, and expose Clutter or MM. Chances are, they take Bailey over the 4th liners.
But, if they don’t, and they took a lot of 4th liners, then you’re screwed.
I agree with you that neither is moving the needle, and that's precisely my point. We saw years of Eberle not being able to do enough to get the team over the hump, it was time to try something new with Palmieri. So far that hasn't worked out. That doesn't mean Eberle was the answer all along. Maybe neither of them are.
Again, I'm pretty sure there were rumblings that Seattle wouldn't have taken Bailey and wanted Martin/Clutterbuck. Then the Islanders would've been stuck with the same team as the year before, sans Palmieri and Zajac.
Maybe they like your 4th liner better than another teams 4th liner. The odds don't seem very good that you could have "forced" them to take Bailey. Just seems like rationalization to me.So why take more 4th liners then? Perhaps keep another interesting player exposed.
Isles were in some impossible decision situations in '20 and '21. It was either Leddy or Toews that needed to be dumped in '20 and either Eberle or Palms in '21. Leddy/Toews was a pure toss up. You could've dumped more salary with Leddy but the return likely would've been less. Toews also had some rough defensive lapses in the bubble which probably stuck in Lou's mind.There is a marginal difference between Ebs and Palms, I'd prefer both for depth. One over the other is a tough call, and really, doesn't matter b/c they aren't true difference makers anyway.
Protect Ebs, and expose Clutter or MM. Chances are, they take Bailey over the 4th liners.
Don't really care for the Oilers, so I'm not sad to see them go. On the other hand, I don't like Vegas too much either. It's irrational, but somehow seeing expansion teams this powerful right off the bat seems off.
You pay your half-billion+ and you get a decent team.Totally what the NHL wanted.
Even at the expense of their own team's success, the ownership groups are very happy about the HUGE cost of buying a team being paid and the immediate growth of the markets.
Vegas and Seattle have taken different paths (well, Seattle's ExDra was sorta harpooned by GMs not wanting to allow for a Vegas Part Deux on the player transfer front), but the success Vegas has had and the season Seattle is having now join together to be an absolute dream for league executives and ownership alike.
Under normal world circumstances where the powers that be would still be striving for a continued capitalistic free market economy, I'd be inclined to write that we should be expecting new teams in Quebec City and another US site (Houston? Salt Lake City?) within 5 years.
Jaguars, D-backs, and the Panthers all started off "powerful"Don't really care for the Oilers, so I'm not sad to see them go. On the other hand, I don't like Vegas too much either. It's irrational, but somehow seeing expansion teams this powerful right off the bat seems off.
You pay your half-billion+ and you get a decent team.
As for future expansion, I just don't see QC ever getting a team. I just don't think there's enough money there and the french language TV money is too small now to split with Montreal.
I think Houston would be the next logical place for sure. Huge TV market and an arena in place.
That said, Bettman was asked about expansion on Bob McCown's podcast earlier this month and said it's not even on their radar. They get calls, but it's not on their list of things to do.
I dunno...Are the Leafs fans wrong?
And everyone here knows that I'm the KING of brain-dead comedy takes in my Pregame rants! Never mind such gems as a Bailey Forever t-shirt . . .This is the same joke 82 times in less than two minutes.
The rise of TikTok has led to so many brain dead comedy pages that people just gobble up.
I don't like that either?Jaguars, D-backs, and the Panthers all started off "powerful"
Agree with the Nurse comment, at the time I couldn't see logic in that signing .Shame about the Oilers. It's been a joy to watch this journey from McDavid, and it's good to finally appreciate a generational player after years of despising Crosby and Ovechkin.
Hope they figure it out, but that Nurse contract is a total disaster.
Yeah, at this point I'm rooting for a CAR-DAL finals.Don't really care for the Oilers, so I'm not sad to see them go. On the other hand, I don't like Vegas too much either. It's irrational, but somehow seeing expansion teams this powerful right off the bat seems off.
I'm one of those dinosaurs who happens to think there's something to be said for "established wisdom". So when I see hockey teams that build from forward back, putting less emphasis on defense and/or goaltending, I kind of enjoy seeing them lose. So, thank you EDM, TOR, NJD, etc..Shame about the Oilers. It's been a joy to watch this journey from McDavid, and it's good to finally appreciate a generational player after years of despising Crosby and Ovechkin.
Hope they figure it out, but that Nurse contract is a total disaster.
Hope the Canes win the whole damn thing