Goldenhands
Slaf_The_Great
- Aug 21, 2016
- 10,236
- 13,505
He is both a need and BPA IMO.I always prefered Dvorsky over Sale when the debate was in. But he's not top 5 for me.
Reinbacher isn't BPA either....he's need at top 5.
He is both a need and BPA IMO.I always prefered Dvorsky over Sale when the debate was in. But he's not top 5 for me.
Reinbacher isn't BPA either....he's need at top 5.
If they relatively even in skill, draft Dvorsky. gives the team the Slovakia chemistry edge.Well as much as I'm not a fan.....when McCagg starts SUDDENLY preferring a player, it's not that he prefers it..it's because he hears stuff. I will always believe that the guy is putrid in prospect evaluation BUT I also believe he has his contacts. Until proven otherwise, he talks a lot about Dvorsky, somebody in the Habs like him very much.....
That's why they took Mesar instead of KulichIf they relatively even in skill, draft Dvorsky. gives the team the Slovakia chemistry edge.
I would secure Reinbacher 1st with our pick since he wont last long and grab best foward available with the Pants pick.Let’s say we have pick 5 and 15.
You draft Benson at 5 (or wish for Michkov) and work your ass up to move up from 15 up to between 7-9 and pick Reinbacher (for all of the Reinbacher lover here).
We have what it take to go up from 15 to 7.
Same.I would secure Reinbacher 1st with our pick since he wont last long and grab best foward available with the Pants pick.
I would take two forwards because I think we got what it take on defence. I will add a veteran RD via trade or ufa.I would secure Reinbacher 1st with our pick since he wont last long and grab best foward available with the Pants pick.
DvorskySame.
Reinbacher
One of
Cristall X
Benson
Smith X
Leonard
Wood X
I'd actually be open to the idea if he wasn't rumored to want to play here.These people talking about trading Florida's pick for PLD are crazy.
They don't realize how valuable a top 15 pick in that draft is.
Who was your own pick? That draft is a black hole, only notable name we missed on is Theodore.
You got that right.Other than exposure, what's missing for Reinbacher? He doesn't have the same physical or skillset limitations we're seeing from nearly every other player 5-15 and it looks like he's got the clearest path to being a solid NHL player outside of this year's top-4. I can't speak to other leagues, but from what I've seen, he'd be far and away the best overall, most translatable defenceman in the WHL. It wouldn't even be very close as he's way ahead of Dragicevic, Molendyk, and Hammell in multiple facets of the game.
If he was playing in Canada/USNDP, I think he'd be a lock as a top-10 pick.
What are your thoughts on Mathew Wood? Seems like the type this management team might like... reminds me a bit of Blake Wheeler...?
That would be a disaster.With talks around Dubois being potentially moved this off-season per Friedman - really starting to think Habs take Reinbacher knowing they got Dubois coming in up front.
Yeah his movement is a bit cumbersome, but he manages to get there. It's always a bit hard to tell with big guys at this age. I like his dangle and he sees the ice pretty well. This is going to be a really fun draft!I love Wood. Hes 10th on my list. He plays just like Kovalev (not quite the same hands, of course), hes a bull on skates, can stick handle in a box, his shot is a threat from anywhere and he pulls passes off increible vision.
He does seem a bit trigger happy and of course, hes slow.
That’s a pretty good track record!Theodore was my pick actually. No idea why Montreal didn't draft him. Ditto Kreider. I thought for sure we'd take them. I also was really high on ROR & Jenner too. Same draft. I remember a lot on here didn't want Jenner. Lol
McCarron was completely out of left field, and moving up for Tinordi was the stupidest move ever.
That’s a pretty good track record!
So…who you liking this year? Lol
Yes for Strbak, the rest I would be disappointedLet's go all Slovak this draft
#6 = Dvorsky
#15 = Honzek
#37 - Strbak
Dvorsky is a great pick imoYes for Strbak, the rest I would be disappointed
With FLA pick for Dvorsky no problem with that but not with a top 6 pick.Dvorsky is a great pick imo
Honzek is a gamble , but at 6,4 if it works ,, we are going to like him
We picked a huge guy as a gamble last year...maybe try something else this year.Dvorsky is a great pick imo
Honzek is a gamble , but at 6,4 if it works ,, we are going to like him