The more games I watch, the more I realize this draft only possesses 5 truly elite talents (the unanimous top 4 + Benson). That's why this team must absolutely finish bottom 5 and ideally bottom 4 (8 pts behind ANA) to secure one of them. After those 5, there's like a group of 8-10 players who could all go 6th OA and we're not talking about players with elite potential imo.
Smith : Elite hands and can make superb plays from the point on the PP, but his skating is terrible (and so is his mechanic, which means he won't get much faster nor agile in the NHL) and his defensive play is non-existent most of the time (and its not like he's trying either). But what really bugs me is his effort level, I dont think Ive seen him win more than 1 board battle a game in the games Ive watched (and that's when he actually try to battle for the puck). I don't get why for some people, he's a clear top 6 guy. Id be hesitant to take him in the top 10 as we speak.
Moore : I like him more than Smith. Skating is elite and he works hard, but it's hard to imagine him becoming more than a 55-60pts 2-3 defensive C who's solid at zone exit/entry. He simply doesn't have the offensive skills (passing skills and shot) needed to be a 60+pts guy. I see both Smith and Moore as a halves of Logan Cooley as the later's got the hands of Smith while also having Moore's skating and intensity.
Leonard : He's the guy I like the most from the USNTDP. Skating, puck skills and defensive games are all solid + his shot is an absolute rocket (and he can use it in so many ways) and he's probably the guy who works the hardest in this draft alongside Benson imo. If we miss on the top 5, which I hope we don't, he's the guy Id like (as of now). We're talking about a 60pts 5'11'' power forward who's great at everything but not dynamic enough to be in the same conversation as Benson imo.
Reinbacher : I like him and I do believe he's got number second pairing Dmen written all over him, but as it's the case with many draft specialists, he doesn't display enough puck skills/offensive instinct to become the guy who'll play next to Guhle for the next 10 years. And honestly, I don't see why we should go for a D this year. We already have 4 young Dmen who are all absolute NHLer + Matheson who might be a 40+ pts dmen for the next 3 seasons + Hutson (I think he'll be a top 10 dmen one day), Mailloux (elite offense, poor hockey IQ, hard to say what he'll be, could play PP1 right away next season or spend two seasons in the A) and Engstrom (what a surprise he's been). That's 7 young players + Matheson (who might pull a Petry and be really good until his mid 30s).
Dvorsky : Poor skater, but really great hands + an elite shot to go along with a really mature defensive game, but as impressive as are his stats in the U20 and as hard as it is for a teen to play in a men's league (Allsv.), he just doesn't look that great. There's some flashes here and there, and he does a really great job on the half-wall on the PP, but other than that he's mostly invisible. Unfortunately, as of now, he just screams project to me with a greater chance than not of becoming a 3C (45-50pts) and we already have Beck for that imo (and taking that kind of player at that rank would be so meh).
Then there's the Barlow, Danielson, Yager and Sale, but honestly, I dont think any of them are really worth it in the top 7.
So, let's pray Farrell scores 10+pts and that Dach, Zuke and cie keeps on producing for the rest of the year, but that we lose all of our remaining games apart from the one against FLA.
Ending with a middle of the lineup player after the season we've had would be absolutely terrible.