2023 NHL Entry Draft

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
considering we have 2 picks in the top 12 I think that would severely mitigate the risk of taking mitchkov in the eyes of management
Yes, Montreal is in a great situation for a "bet" on a top Russian prospect in this political environment with the potential 2 top 10 picks... Reduces the pressure for sure on management, and Gorton has shown in the past he does not mind a Russian with a top pick (Kravtsov).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
I think Hughes and Gorton will avoid to risk a russian pick with a high pick this year. After all the talk with Mailloux's pick, I think they will go elsewhere. Another team will take the risk.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jellybeans
I think Hughes and Gorton will avoid to risk a russian pick with a high pick this year. After all the talk with Mailloux's pick, I think they will go elsewhere. Another team will take the risk.

The Mailloux talk has no impact whatsoever on drafting Russian prospects.
Drafting Mitchkov won't cause a social media outrage. The only concern is whether they will be able to bring Mitchkov to North America within a few years.
 
Biggest disappointments so far this season have been Dvorsky and Yager, I see no progression at all.

Also, I dont have Fantilli in the same tier as Bedard, Carlsson, Michkov. Its more Smith vs Fantilli for 4th OV for me.
How does Smith compare to Cooley from last year?
 
The Mailloux talk has no impact whatsoever on drafting Russian prospects.
Drafting Mitchkov won't cause a social media outrage. The only concern is whether they will be able to bring Mitchkov to North America within a few years.
The CH did not draft any Russians in 2022. Is it just a coincidence? Possible.
Anyway, Molson must remember Mailloux's selection. The war is not over.
Beyond the russian factor, I think it's a bit controversial to select a russian player high right now. We are in Montreal. It is It's just a point of view I have.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jellybeans
don’t act like your not impressed
7C06640E-AED5-4857-9DCE-6578C34D7542.jpeg
 
Gotta slow down on the fantasy of us winning both the 1st and 2nd overall pick. The chances of that happening are extremely minuscule.

Ottawa had pick 2 and 3 a couple of years, and not only did they not win the lottery, but they also dropped down to 3 and 5.
All I'm hearing here is that we're gonna have a 2020 Ottawa draft and I'm here for it
 
Gotta slow down on the fantasy of us winning both the 1st and 2nd overall pick. The chances of that happening are extremely minuscule.

Ottawa had pick 2 and 3 a couple of years, and not only did they not win the lottery, but they also dropped down to 3 and 5.
The thing with 2 picks in the top 10, it would increase our chances drastically to at least win 1 lottery spot. Right now we have a combined odds of 11% at winning the 1st lottery spot, about the same odds as Columbus who stands as the 3rd worst team.

I dont know why, but I have a feeling the odds will increase even higher for the reminder of the calendar, so we could end up having the same odds with the combined 1st round picks as the 2nd last place team to land Bedard, what would be around 13%.

If we win the lottery with 1 of our picks, I would of course draft Bedard and then offer the other one to Winnipeg for Dubois (signed long term).

Slafkovsky Suzuki Bedard

Caufield Dubois Heineman

Ylonen Dach Anderson

Thats the kind of top 9 we could have as soon as next year.
 
Last edited:
The thing with 2 picks in the top 10, it would increase our chance drastically to at least win 1 lottery spot. Right now we have a combined odds of 11% at winning the 1st lottery spot, about the same odds as Columbus who stands as the 3rd worst team.

I dont know why, but I have a feeling the odds will increase even higher for the reminder of the calendar, so we could end up having the same odds with the combined 1st round picks as the 2nd last place team to land Bedard, what would be around 13%.

If we win the lottery with 1 of our picks, I would of course draft Bedard and then offer the other one to Winnipeg for Dubois (signed long term).

Slafkovsky Suzuki Bedard

Caufield Dubois Heineman

Ylonen Dach Anderson

Thats the kind of top 9 we could have as soon as next year.
I'm not a big fan of giving a big payday to Dubois before inking longterm our young nhl players like Caufield/Guhle.

I don't want a Tavares 2.0 situation in Montreal where everybody expect the big money because we went all out on a free agent. I think the best thing to do is to sit on our hands and wait for summer 2024 on the Dubois situation. Lot of things can change until then, and I'm pretty sure he'll want to test free agency. We'll make an offer then.

If you have Bedard, Fantilli or Carlsson in the middle with Suzuki (could see Bedard on the wing though), do you really want to commit 9 millions per for 7 years to Dubois?
 
The thing with 2 picks in the top 10, it would increase our chance drastically to at least win 1 lottery spot. Right now we have a combined odds of 11% at winning the 1st lottery spot, about the same odds as Columbus who stands as the 3rd worst team.

I dont know why, but I have a feeling the odds will increase even higher for the reminder of the calendar, so we could end up having the same odds with the combined 1st round picks as the 2nd last place team to land Bedard, what would be around 13%.

If we win the lottery with 1 of our picks, I would of course draft Bedard and then offer the other one to Winnipeg for Dubois (signed long term).

Slafkovsky Suzuki Bedard

Caufield Dubois Heineman

Ylonen Dach Anderson

Thats the kind of top 9 we could have as soon as next year.

Get out of here with Dubois, if he wants to be a UFA the following year and come here for free he will. In the meantime draft again, don't give up a top 10 pick in a trade.
 
If you have Bedard, Fantilli or Carlsson in the middle with Suzuki (could see Bedard on the wing though), do you really want to commit 9 millions per for 7 years to Dubois?
Pretty sure in Goldenhands scenario the 2nd pick is around 6-10 so no Michkov/Carlsson/Fantilli.

I that case I also think trading for and signing Dubois this summer could be a good move just because there is no guarantee he will come over when UFA and it may lower his AAV a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goldenhands
If there is any scenario where you can trade a 1st that isnt the top pick for Dubois, you 100% do it everyday of the week! Only on HF are undrafted prospects worth more than established star players.

Im gonna put Bedard as an exception here but other than that, Fantilli an co, aspire to become as productive and impactful as Dubois. You always take ths sure thing
 
Gotta slow down on the fantasy of us winning both the 1st and 2nd overall pick. The chances of that happening are extremely minuscule.

Ottawa had pick 2 and 3 a couple of years, and not only did they not win the lottery, but they also dropped down to 3 and 5.
No one is saying it's realistic, it's just funny to think about

If there is any scenario where you can trade a 1st that isnt the top pick for Dubois, you 100% do it everyday of the week! Only on HF are undrafted prospects worth more than established star players.

Im gonna put Bedard as an exception here but other than that, Fantilli an co, aspire to become as productive and impactful as Dubois. You always take ths sure thing
Dubois is a star player ?
 
The thing with 2 picks in the top 10, it would increase our chance drastically to at least win 1 lottery spot. Right now we have a combined odds of 11% at winning the 1st lottery spot, about the same odds as Columbus who stands as the 3rd worst team.

I dont know why, but I have a feeling the odds will increase even higher for the reminder of the calendar, so we could end up having the same odds with the combined 1st round picks as the 2nd last place team to land Bedard, what would be around 13%.

If we win the lottery with 1 of our picks, I would of course draft Bedard and then offer the other one to Winnipeg for Dubois (signed long term).

Slafkovsky Suzuki Bedard

Caufield Dubois Heineman

Ylonen Dach Anderson

Thats the kind of top 9 we could have as soon as next year.
keep all picks ,wait 1 more year, than you can have that lineup if you win the lottery for bedard, sign Dubois as a UFA,
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElQuebecois
I'm not a big fan of giving a big payday to Dubois before inking longterm our young nhl players like Caufield/Guhle.

I don't want a Tavares 2.0 situation in Montreal where everybody expect the big money because we went all out on a free agent. I think the best thing to do is to sit on our hands and wait for summer 2024 on the Dubois situation. Lot of things can change until then, and I'm pretty sure he'll want to test free agency. We'll make an offer then.

If you have Bedard, Fantilli or Carlsson in the middle with Suzuki (could see Bedard on the wing though), do you really want to commit 9 millions per for 7 years to Dubois?

keep all picks ,wait 1 more year, than you can have that lineup if you win the lottery for bedard, sign Dubois as a UFA,
Thing is, another team might show up, trade some assets to get him extended. Also I dont see any player past the top 5 having close the upside of PLD, guys like Dvorsky, Yager, Sale arent trending well. Maybe Reinbacher can amount to a top pairing defenseman, but thats about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Pretty sure in Goldenhands scenario the 2nd pick is around 6-10 so no Michkov/Carlsson/Fantilli.

I that case I also think trading for and signing Dubois this summer could be a good move just because there is no guarantee he will come over when UFA and it may lower his AAV a bit.

Still no chance in hell we should trade this pick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad