2023 NHL Draft June 28 and 29, Nashville, TN (Selections - 13, 39, 45, 86, 109, 141, 173, 205)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fjordy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
17,065
9,381
Benson would be a gift 13.

Simashev also likes everything even at 13, but it is difficult to predict where he will gone. If some team likes him, they can take him to the top 10 or top 15-20.
 

Zach716

Pucks in deep
Nov 24, 2018
4,436
5,012
Reuniting Benson and Savoie would be a cool story line but eventually we are going to have to cap how many short forwards are on this team
 

debaser66

Registered User
Mar 10, 2012
5,106
2,826
He's a good sized center that plays a 200' game, doesn't have any holes in his game unlike a lot of other players. You can argue that he doesn't have the highest ceiling but his floor is elevated. Basically he's at worse a surefire mid 6 C that will pk and play a defensive game
Sounds a bit like Kaspar last yeae
 

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
24,747
31,157
Danielson is a fine player who I don’t like any more than Ostlund at Center going forward. That’s not a reason not to draft him…but it makes me not excited about the prospect of doing so. IMO He doesn’t drive play, looks to slow the pace and he’s not as good of a skater. Just…don’t know what we’d do with him to make him worth 13.
 

Fjordy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
17,065
9,381
Danielson is a fine player who I don’t like any more than Ostlund at Center going forward. That’s not a reason not to draft him…but it makes me not excited about the prospect of doing so. IMO He doesn’t drive play, looks to slow the pace and he’s not as good of a skater. Just…don’t know what we’d do with him to make him worth 13.
I just think at 13 would be the best options.
 

Royal Thunder

Frolunda Mode
Feb 21, 2012
4,424
3,469


I don't know who I like more, people who think it was rigged because of the teleprompter SNAFU and Weekes talking about how C'Bus landed 3rd early or the people that think this would make for good TV and replace the current envelope reveal.

It would be better for TV if they did it right. They don’t have to show Bettman going through all of the technicalities beforehand but they could show the balls being put in the machine and the draws. Updating live odds between each ball would be fun
 
  • Like
Reactions: HOOats

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
155,551
109,577
Tarnation
What’s the main knock on Perreault, is it his skating? The numbers are certainly eye popping

Yeah, there is some concern about his skating and about the lack of size. He's probably going to be a playmaking winger, curious how he rounds out because there is very much a creative connector there.
 

The Blunder Years

Registered User
Nov 11, 2013
2,592
2,251
716
I definitely want us going BPA at 13 instead of reaching on a positional need. Would like to see us go heavy on d in day 2 and 3 though to give us a pipeline of d prospects for the future.
 

Doug Prishpreed

Registered User
May 1, 2013
11,077
7,533
Brooklyn
This is a Canucks article that has a lot of opinions that apply to the Sabres at 13, as well
I would really hope Simashev doesn’t drop 20 spots just because he’s Russian, like the one scout here is assuming he will. The kid really wants to play in the NHL and has such great character.

Someone is going to get a late round steal and it already pisses me off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
24,747
31,157

I would really hope Simashev doesn’t drop 20 spots just because he’s Russian, like the one scout here is assuming he will. The kid really wants to play in the NHL and has such great character.

Someone is going to get a late round steal and it already pisses me off.
They might as well have just answered every D question with a poop emoji. We’re caught in a trap with D. They’re not great this year and they’re not plentiful. A double threat.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
155,551
109,577
Tarnation
They might as well have just answered every D question with a poop emoji. We’re caught in a trap with D. They’re not great this year and they’re not plentiful. A double threat.

In the first round they aren't. In the second and third round, the guys who either didn't answer questions enough to move up into the first round this year or guys who DID and slid are going to be thick on defense in those rounds. It need not be at 13.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad