That's been true for the four decades I've been watching. The whole purpose of the off-speed pitch away is to get guys out in front and to roll over, and that's always been the case. It's not some new phenomenon.yeah no.
rolling over on outside pitches is a fundamental issue plaguing modern day MLB
David Wright was another Met who excelled there. Obviously he didn't have Piazza's raw power, but when he was on, that right-center power alley was a spot he abused.I would have loved me some Mike Piazza exit velocities. He scorched the ball the other way and well into opposite field stands and bullpens. His opposite field stroke is the prettiest I ever saw. That sound coming off the bat, I'll never forget it.
Or, ya know just bunt. It doesn’t even have to be a particularly good buntExcept there are tons of examples of players who adjust and hit the ball the other way. It's part of the basic fundamentals of the sport. If they play you to pull every AB, maybe you should be focusing on how to hit the ball the other way to keep them honest. It's not a crazy ask/concept
Teams shift--and have unique shifts for each player--because they have so much data, they know with such a high degree of certainty where a player will hit a ball, particularly when pitched a certain way (relative terms, here). Dropping down a bunt here and there, I don't think would really change much. Like a team is not going to stop shifting an extreme pull hitter because he might drop a bunt once a week--they'll gladly accept a guy getting on with a bunt once in a while in exchange for taking away multiple other hits by utilizing the shift.Or, ya know just bunt. It doesn’t even have to be a particularly good bunt
Do it a few times and it will keep them honest.
Yet for some reason teams continually shift against guys like McNeil and Guillorme.Teams shift--and have unique shifts for each player--because they have so much data, they know with such a high degree of certainty where a player will hit a ball, particularly when pitched a certain way (relative terms, here).
Those two downright baffle me. Guillorme will continue to hit the SS hole and McNeil will too.Yet for some reason teams continually shift against guys like McNeil and Guillorme.
Yet for some reason teams continually shift against guys like McNeil and Guillorme.
And McNeil hits a huge majority of his batted balls right at that shift, so.... What's the argument? McNeil would probably hit .350 if they didn't shift him.Yet for some reason teams continually shift against guys like McNeil and Guillorme.
Is that the percentages against the shift or total?Why wouldn't they? McNeil has hit 73% of his batted balls on the infield to the center or right side. He's hit 10% of balls toward the 3rd base line area. Harper is at 8%. Bellinger is 10%. Schwarber 8%.
Tough L for the Mets. I personally was saying "hold him" on the play in the ninth, because it was shallow and the guy was coming in, but the Mets have been very aggressive on those plays all year so I'm good with it. It didn't require a perfect throw, even to get Marte, but the dude made one anyway.
No run support, what else is new. Made that lone run work.deGrom doing deGrom things. Hasn’t missed a beat.