Yeah. You can only do so much to go the other way when they're pitching you to hit into the shift.Hot take: "just hit the ball the other way" in response to the shift is very annoying.
Yeah, just hit 101 on your hands to opposite field. That's how baseball works.
They shouldn't be taught that way then, perhaps. The best, classic hitters through the history of MLB have never been exclusively pull hitters.Yeah. You can only do so much to go the other way when they're pitching you to hit into the shift.
Like I had said on Twitter, Ryan Zimmerman was talking about how all the top young ball players are taught almost exclusively to pull the ball and hit it into the air. So from age 10-25 these guys are taught to do a particular thing, and then people are surprised when they can't suddenly morph into a slap hitter who goes the other way, or when they can't drop down a bunt after having literally not bunted in five years. And, like you said, when facing an endless stream of dudes who throw 100 with movement.
Hitting a baseball is a uniquely hard skill that even the best in the world fail at 75 out of 100 times. I think people lose sight of just how hard it is.
I'm not saying it's a crazy concept, I'm just saying it's much harder in practice than in theory. If every player could just magically learn to slap the ball the other way, eliminating the shift and dramatically increasing their BA, don't you think everyone would do it? Of course there are guys who excel at the bat-to-ball skill and can make that adjustment more easily, but there are just as many, if not more, guys who can't.Except there are tons of examples of players who adjust and hit the ball the other way. It's part of the basic fundamentals of the sport. If they play you to pull every AB, maybe you should be focusing on how to hit the ball the other way to keep them honest. It's not a crazy ask/concept
I agree that it probably shouldn't be taught that way. But it is, which just reinforces the problem. It's not just a problem with current major leaguers, but with a lot of the guys coaching them, and unfortunately, with a lot of the guys coming up through the minors. It's all about optimizing launch angle and maximizing exit velo, which has all the kids trying to put the ball in the air.They shouldn't be taught that way then, perhaps. The best, classic hitters through the history of MLB have never been exclusively pull hitters.
Ted Williams says hello. However teams shifted against him back then too.They shouldn't be taught that way then, perhaps. The best, classic hitters through the history of MLB have never been exclusively pull hitters.
I agree that it probably shouldn't be taught that way. But it is, which just reinforces the problem. It's not just a problem with current major leaguers, but with a lot of the guys coaching them, and unfortunately, with a lot of the guys coming up through the minors. It's all about optimizing launch angle and maximizing exit velo, which has all the kids trying to put the ball in the air.
I remember an article about Jeff McNeil, who chokes up so much he's basically halfway up the bat, and who has some of the best contact skills on the Mets. He was talking about he knows when he's going good, because he's hitting fly balls to right. He knows he's off when he's hitting it on the ground, because, in his words, ground balls in the majors are outs.
Yes, it is sort of weird. I think though that it reflects what I said above, that that's what the guys come up conditioned to do--pull the ball, put it in the air. I think when you hear it from a guy like McNeil who is known for his contact skills and not his power, it shows shows how prevalent that mentality is.Well that's a weird comment because the league average BABIP on ground balls is much higher than that of fly balls. It's just they're almost exclusively singles compared to the fly balls which are much more often extra base hits
For every Ted Williams, there's a Tony Gwynn, a Rod Carew, Ichiro Suzuki, Jeter, even our own Keith, John Olerud. Even Piazza drove the opposite field with power.Ted Williams says hello. However teams shifted against him back then too.
You hit the ball where it's pitched.They shouldn't be taught that way then, perhaps. The best, classic hitters through the history of MLB have never been exclusively pull hitters.
Don't forget uppercuts. Uppercut that shit out.You hit the ball where it's pitched.
The shift works because everybody's hips fly open, attempting to pull all pitches.
And if they weren't "taught that" and were directed into making contact, protecting and KNOWING the plate and going the other way......they would be better all around "hitters" not swingers.I'm not saying it's a crazy concept, I'm just saying it's much harder in practice than in theory. If every player could just magically learn to slap the ball the other way, eliminating the shift and dramatically increasing their BA, don't you think everyone would do it? Of course there are guys who excel at the bat-to-ball skill and can make that adjustment more easily, but there are just as many, if not more, guys who can't.
When you're not taught to go the other way, go back up the middle, "hit it where it's pitched" or however you want to phrase it, then it's no longer fundamental.
The game is played completely different to how I was taught.. maybe it's why I don't watch as much anymore.Don't forget uppercuts. Uppercut that shit out.
It's not. It's wanting Chytil to not try to skate through 4 players and pass to an open guy instead. In this case, Ted Williams = Connor McDavid. They can do what they want.“Just hit the other way/bunt” is the baseball equivalent of “shoot the puck” lmao
The reason the Mets strategy works for them is that they have players with the ability to foul off those tough pitches instead of missing them. Over time, the pitcher is going to miss his spot eventually.
The evolution of the game is that pitchers are able to hit spots that cause the batter to put the ball in play in a specific area of the field or the batter will flat out miss the pitch. When you have a cutter running in at 98 on the hands, the only way to hit it is to pull it. What the Mets are doing is fouling that pitch off. When the pitcher misses their spot away, they go with it and it is viewed as "beating the shift".
It is a philosophy, but I don't think many teams can pull it off. They also have multiple players that know the strikezone. They actually work pitchers like the Yankees used to. People can say that it doesn't work in the playoffs, but burning through starters and forcing teams to use their pen for 12 outs every game is a lot, even with an extra arm in the pen, plus if you do get to the starter, they're out in the 3rd like Strider was on Sunday.
yeah no.“Just hit the other way/bunt” is the baseball equivalent of “shoot the puck” lmao