Vinny Boombatz
formerly ctwin22
I'd pick either Sale or Dvorsky because I think they have higher ceilings than the rest of the group
I like players that attack the middle. I like guys that hound pucks. Those that have a direct and forceful element to their games.I'd pick either Sale or Dvorsky because I think they have higher ceilings than the rest of the group
I look for "elite" factors in prospects...just like when I was talking about Maccelli being a wizard, elite quickness, elite passing.I like players that attack the middle. I like guys that hound pucks. Those that have a direct and forceful element to their games.
Nifty east-west stuff out on the flanks interests me less. Cerebral, soccer-style skills that smartly optimize large ice just never gets me hyped up.
That’s my own bias. I’m not a scout. I can’t pick out which players will be the best players. I can only pick out which prospects I like the most as prospects.
Shane Doan, though.I look for "elite" factors in prospects...just like when I was talking about Maccelli being a wizard, elite quickness, elite passing.
things I look for
Elite Quickness
Elite IQ
Elite Passing
Elite Skating
Elite Shooting
I want prospects to have at least 2 of these...if they don't then secondary characteristics fall into play, like hounding pucks, being tough, one-on-one battles...but to me, these secondary skills don't mean much if they do not have 2 elite skills.
Maccelli - elite quickness (shiftiness), elite passing, great hockey IQ
Hayton - vanilla at everything, I'd give him elite IQ, but other than that, nothing else.
Gotta have 2 elite skills
I know...but I just can't gauge those types of players...I love em, just can't judge them. I'm better at recognizing "elite" skills and projecting production.Shane Doan, though.
DvorskyWho do you like best from this group?
Dvorsky, Ritchie, Sale, Yager
Unlike the top 5 guys, these will have big roles at the U18s.
I like this guy.
For the first rounder, maybe even second rounder, not a whole lot.Quick question for the group, how much do you guys care about in-class birthdays? Like Nate Danielson is 9.5 months older than Quintin Musty. How much does that matter?
It matters...I like Danielson right now, but Musty has a lot of skills. Danielson will go in the 1st round, my guess anywhere between 12-18 and Musty I think could fall to the 2nd round.Quick question for the group, how much do you guys care about in-class birthdays? Like Nate Danielson is 9.5 months older than Quintin Musty. How much does that matter?
I think he could go top 15-20. He's 6'0" and the other forwards around that slot all seem to be under that mark.It matters...I like Danielson right now, but Musty has a lot of skills. Danielson will go in the 1st round, my guess anywhere between 12-18 and Musty I think could fall to the 2nd round.
I was wondering the same thing. We have so much draft capital for the next few seasons. Would another team want to part with an elite prospect like Fantilli, Carlsson etc for the number 6-9 pick and multiple second round picks? probably not.If we have plus or minus the #9 slot, would BA consider trading down for 2 later #1 picks?
Matters enough that I look at their month of birth every single time. Most growth is done by age 17 or 18, however, some will continue to grow into the early 20’s. It's rare after 18 but still relevant.Quick question for the group, how much do you guys care about in-class birthdays? Like Nate Danielson is 9.5 months older than Quintin Musty. How much does that matter?
No.I was wondering the same thing. We have so much draft capital for the next few seasons. Would another team want to part with an elite prospect like Fantilli, Carlsson etc for the number 6-9 pick and multiple second round picks? probably not.
NOIf we have plus or minus the #9 slot, would BA consider trading down for 2 later #1 picks?
We have the quantity already in pool and huge amount of picks in the next 3 years, we need more qualityIf we have plus or minus the #9 slot, would BA consider trading down for 2 later #1 picks?
sounds like the plan is to run with a deep roster. It's the St Louis model. I don't disagree with trading up but let's be honest there's nobody that is going to do that in the top 5. San Jose included.I’m with Jake. We should be trading up not down, if anything. Quality over quantity. We need to consolidate. Look at LA with their huge pile of B-talent that they can’t fit into the lineup anywhere. They’re clogged with decent to mediocre prospects.
I didn’t mean with our first pick necessarily. More just conceptually. We’ve acquired an absolutely ridiculous quantity of picks and prospects. More are coming. Which is great. And I’m still onboard with BPA. But I’d like to look for ways to consolidate also.sounds like the plan is to run with a deep roster. It's the St Louis model. I don't disagree with trading up but let's be honest there's nobody that is going to do that in the top 5. San Jose included.
I wouldn't. We need more quality, less quantity at this point IMO.If we have plus or minus the #9 slot, would BA consider trading down for 2 later #1 picks?