Freddy Sjostrom
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2018
- 571
- 628
Oliver Moore going up…
Dvo hat trick in J20 today..
100%It's clear that he is the 2nd best talent...but you have to wait 4yrs and there is always the possibility he doesn't come over and just takes huge $$ to stay in Russia.
I just wonder which top 5 team is going to take him?
I really can’t understand Smith over Benson. I think Benson is so clearly better at everything. Not as tall. And not a center. But a truly special and elite talent.If we are 4th, I look at Michkov and Smith before Benson
Positional bias likely. Smith has 1st line skills which as a C makes him attractive. I don’t like his work ethic.I really can’t understand Smith over Benson. I think Benson is so clearly better at everything. Not as tall. And not a center. But a truly special and elite talent.
It’s not just the motor. It’s every single skill.Positional bias likely. Smith has 1st line skills which as a C makes him attractive. I don’t like his work ethic.
But it's not...you feel he's better in every skill and there are people like me who feel Smith is better at everything except for the motor.It’s not just the motor. It’s every single skill.
It’s not even close.But it's not...you feel he's better in every skill and there are people like me who feel Smith is better at everything except for the motor.
I should say a you are correct. I’m talking about me. I love olives and my hates them.But it's not...you feel he's better in every skill and there are people like me who feel Smith is better at everything except for the motor.
Here are the publication choicesFor me, Benson vs Michkov & Carlsson is the argument. Smith is next on my list but he’s not even in that conversation. I would listen to Yager vs Smith. Or Barlow or Reinbacher or whoever.
It’s not even close.
Smith v Yager is a debate. That I could get into the details and the back and forth. That’s a good conversation. Smith v Benson I really can’t even get into. There’s a huge gulf between them.
Benson is short. I won’t deny it.Here are the publication choices
FC Hockey: Bedard/Fantilli/Michkov/Carlsson/Benson/Smith
Hockey News: Bedard/Fantilli/Carlsson/Michkov/Smith/Benson(9)
McKeens: Bedard/Fantilli/Carlsson/Michkov/Smith/Benson(7)
Central Scouting NA: Bedard/Fantilli/Smith/Benson(7)
Sportsnet: Bedard/Fantilli/Carlsson/Michkov/Smith/Benson
BobbyMac: Bedard/Fantilli/Carlsson/Michkov/Benson/Smith
Button: Bedard/Fantilli/Carlsson/Sale/Michkov/Smith/Benson(9)
So I don't think it's all that clear...clear to you maybe, but not to the myriad of scouting publications out there who clearly value Smith higher.
ok, you got me, I'm sure "ALL" the publications are valuing him lower "only" because he's shorter.Benson is short. I won’t deny it.
Yep. Only explanation. Nothing else makes sense.ok, you got me, I'm sure "ALL" the publications are valuing him lower "only" because he's shorter.
The publications are always several months behind.ok, you got me, I'm sure "ALL" the publications are valuing him lower "only" because he's shorter.
I’d rather worry about the color of the team suit for when we have to pick Bedard.Ya know, having to choose between Michkov, benson and smith might be a pretty good problem to have