Toggle sidebar

Prospect Info: 2023 Draft Thread (Yotes picking #6 & #12)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rt
  • Start date Start date
  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yotes4Cup said:
I am just stating how they are the same height and weight. Benson def plays different than Cristall, but he is small still which worries me.

It still pays to be big in the NHL. We got our fair share of smaller players already. I still will be happy if we draft Benson though don't get me wrong.
Click to expand...
Benson is definitely small. No doubt about that.
 
Looking at the standings and remaining schedule, it's pretty much a lock our picks will be 9 and 10 or 9 and 11. I don't think we'll catch Detroit but there's no way St. Louis and Vancouver stay ahead of us. Ottawa's schedule and goalie issues should keep them right about where they are.
 
8 home games remaining. .621 home pt% gives us 10 pts
5 road games remaining. .306 road pt% gives us 3 pts.
63+10+3=74, or .451 on the season, which would keep us in the same spot with the 7th worst record.

Odds are we pick 7th and 10th.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
rt said:
Benson and Cristall don’t play the same way at all. That’s like saying Shane Doan and Peter Meuller were the same height and weight, what’s the difference?
Click to expand...
(Heh; I just thought of those two last night after they dropped the "macelli has the most assists for a coyote rookie since Peter Mueller" nugget. Specifically them finding it so funny when they snuck a "boom goes the dynamite" reference into a post game interview)
 
Jakey53 said:
You guys have been spouting off for the last year that this draft is talent heavy for most of the first round, so why take a project with our picks? IF we have a pick in the top ten I want the closest thing to a sure bet that I can find. Even with our second pick, which is currently at 11th. Time will tell what BA is thinking.
Click to expand...
Project = atill a really good player who may take longer.

For all the flack we have thrown at Geekie’s inconsistency i should point out he was recently amed a top 50 prospect for yhe entire keague. Cooley was rated as the top prospect in the league.
 
This is from Scott Wheeler's recent article in the Athletic

12. Matthew Wood — C/RW, University of Connecticut, 6-foot-4
One of my favourites in the 2005 age group, Wood is the youngest player in college hockey this season (he was, for a moment, its only 17-year-old) and has stepped right in to become an impactful player on a good UConn team (albeit as a winger after playing mostly centre at the Jr. A level). His near point-per-game production at the top of the Huskies’ stat sheet comes a year after he led the BCHL in goals (45 in 46 games) and points (85) for a 1.85 points-per-game clip that stands as the most productive 16-year-old season in the league in decades, besting Alex Newhook (1.47), Kyle Turris (1.26), Tyson Jost (0.98), and Kent Johnson (0.81) — while being four months younger than Johnson was at the time. Wood is a rangy, goal-scoring forward who has silky hands for his size (considering the long stick he uses, he’s got great control on the toe of his blade out wide and the heel in tight to his feet), a marksman’s shot inside the offensive zone (both through a natural shooting motion and his one-timer), and a sixth sense for arriving around the net/slot at the right time.

He’s got quick hands one-on-one, he drops pucks back into his shooting stance effortlessly, and he’s got a beautiful curl-and-drag motion. There’s work to do to get a little quicker from a standstill, and that leaves some believing he’s more of a mid-to-late first than an upper-half-of-the-first guy, but he’s better suited as a playmaker and finisher than a power forward type anyways. I love the way he slows down the game, adjusts and maneuvers his frame and shades pucks. Mix in a multi-dimensional shooting arsenal and I see top-six upside.

Wood played mainly wing in the BCHL. Wheeler was wrong on that part.
 
Last edited:
hbk said:
Project = atill a really good player who may take longer.

For all the flack we have thrown at Geekie’s inconsistency i should point out he was recently amed a top 50 prospect for yhe entire keague. Cooley was rated as the top prospect in the league.
Click to expand...
What league are you talking about? NCAA? WHL?
 
Yotes4Cup said:
I am just stating how they are the same height and weight. Benson def plays different than Cristall, but he is small still which worries me.

It still pays to be big in the NHL. We got our fair share of smaller players already. I still will be happy if we draft Benson though don't get me wrong.
Click to expand...
Benson skates much much better than Cristall and doesn't play small. He isn't a perimeter player. Cristall plays small. It's hard to explain. But Benson doesn't play similar to him at all and has much better core strength and protects the puck better- much better. Benson has great speed and agility as well which leads to him getting hit a lot less. Cristall's agility is alright but nothing special. You're right that it could happen to anyone, you put your head down in one instance and get lit up and that's it...but Cristall does that a lot more than Benson does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose and Half Clapper
We've got Lamoreaux and Duda...so it's not like we're completely empty on the backend

Both ceilings are quite high and they're much larger than the Ducks D Group
 
Nobody knew Hutson was going to be able to beast mode in the NHL as a smurf. People were right to have anxiety about his smurfness.

Also, our D corp is great.

Moser, Soderstrom, Dudas, Lamoreaux, Koly, Kesselring, Valimaki, and probably one of Bergkvist, Emil, and Langlois will pan out. That's 6 guys picked in the top 60 as defenseman and only Moser and Valimaki aren't really prospects any more. We have an embarrassment of riches at D IMO. None of them may be true #1s but I don't think that matters when you're that deep.

Langlois is 11th in D-man scoring in the QMJHL. Duda is a PPG in the MHL, something only 2 other d-man can claim. Soderstrom and Kesselring are both doing well in the AHL. Koly is doing well too. I really don't get why everyone thinks our D sucks and is a need.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ebbisen, RollingCoyote and Summer Rose
Have any of you guys looked into Riley Heidt? He’s now 5th in WHL scoring. Kinda surprised he’s ranked in the 20s…
 
dv018 said:
Nobody knew Hutson was going to be able to beast mode in the NHL as a smurf. People were right to have anxiety about his smurfness.

Also, our D corp is great.

Moser, Soderstrom, Dudas, Lamoreaux, Koly, Kesselring, Valimaki, and probably one of Bergkvist, Emil, and Langlois will pan out. That's 6 guys picked in the top 60 as defenseman and only Moser and Valimaki aren't really prospects any more. We have an embarrassment of riches at D IMO. None of them may be true #1s but I don't think that matters when you're that deep.

Langlois is 11th in D-man scoring in the QMJHL. Duda is a PPG in the MHL, something only 2 other d-man can claim. Soderstrom and Kesselring are both doing well in the AHL. Koly is doing well too. I really don't get why everyone thinks our D sucks and is a need.
Click to expand...
It's because we don't have any clear cut #1 guys, although I think that Dudas & Lamoreaux have ability to be one
 
Yotes4Cup said:
Have any of you guys looked into Riley Heidt? He’s now 5th in WHL scoring. Kinda surprised he’s ranked in the 20s…
Click to expand...
I’ve watched him play a handful of games. Very smart player. Smooth playmaker and skater. Quietly effective from what I’ve seen. I’ll be watching a backlog of PG games soon. Honestly, he hasn’t been a big standout apart from the production, from a tools perspective. But my sample is small. His teammate Ziemmer is quite noticeable. And someone I’d be thrilled to get with our 2nd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Half Clapper and Vinny Boombatz
dv018 said:
Nobody knew Hutson was going to be able to beast mode in the NHL as a smurf. People were right to have anxiety about his smurfness.

Also, our D corp is great.

Moser, Soderstrom, Dudas, Lamoreaux, Koly, Kesselring, Valimaki, and probably one of Bergkvist, Emil, and Langlois will pan out. That's 6 guys picked in the top 60 as defenseman and only Moser and Valimaki aren't really prospects any more. We have an embarrassment of riches at D IMO. None of them may be true #1s but I don't think that matters when you're that deep.

Langlois is 11th in D-man scoring in the QMJHL. Duda is a PPG in the MHL, something only 2 other d-man can claim. Soderstrom and Kesselring are both doing well in the AHL. Koly is doing well too. I really don't get why everyone thinks our D sucks and is a need.
Click to expand...
We have quantity over quality. Until they play in the NHL we have no idea what we have.
 
Dragicevic will go late 1st, early 2nd and I'm hoping that we can move some of our 3rd draft capital to get back into the 2nd and draft Daniil But

7 - Dvorsky
11 - Honzek (I had Danielson there, but I keep forgetting that I'm in awe of Honzek and think he's going to be Jason Robertson)
39 - Dragicevic or Bonk
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DoanStopBelievin and Grimes
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom