Freddy Sjostrom
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2018
- 571
- 628
Left wing vs right shot center (to be fair Smith may be projected NHL winger). 5-9’ vs 5-11.75’. College vs major junior. Both incredible playmakers. Both play with high end talent on good teams. Benson obviously plays with more jam, willing to get his nose dirty. Benson with 62 pts in 36. Smith with 59 pts in 32. Pick your poison. Edit- Smith is described by most as a strong skater, where Benson is not.If we don’t win one do the lotteries, I think we’ll be doing a lot of arguing over Benson or Smith.
Yeah Cooley may not be giant but he doesn't play small at all. He's a huge prick whenever I've seen him play hahahaI think Bill can push aside his 6'1 draftee criteria when he's looking at elite talent. He rightfully did with Cooley. I think being willing to get your nose dirty is still part of the criteria though.
If it becomes evident that Will Smith is a perimeter player that doesn't battle in the corner (I'm not saying he is) then Bill would look elsewhere.
Nobody thinks of Nazem Kadri as small.
Any theories on difficulty moving up in this draft? Will teams be willing to trade down out of the top 15?
Who does Smith play for?Left wing vs right shot center (to be fair Smith may be projected NHL winger). 5-9’ vs 5-11.75’. College vs major junior. Both incredible playmakers. Both play with high end talent on good teams. Benson obviously plays with more jam, willing to get his nose dirty. Benson with 62 pts in 36. Smith with 59 pts in 32. Pick your poison. Edit- Smith is described by most as a strong skater, where Benson is not.
I wouldn't consider Kadri small. I mean, he's not tree stump big, but he is 6', 192 lbs.Nobody thinks of Nazem Kadri as small.
I don't see Ottawa or Buffalo trading their pick in a Chychrun deal. They may trade for Chyhrun, but I doubt they trade that pick. It would be nice though.That's actually not a bad comparable for Cooley. Less snarl and more skill. Somewhere between Kadri and Hughes.
Let's say the draft was today:
5th SJ - No way they move back despite how shallow their pool is
6th VAN - After such a disappointing season I think heads would roll if they moved back. Shallow prospect pool but there's a good chance they will have multiple 1sts anyways
7th MTL - Starts to get interesting here. Suzuki, Caufield, Slaf, Dach is the foundation of a good top 6. They need to work on the blue line and just generally filling out their prospect pool. Problem is FLA pick could be top 12 so probably wouldn't be interested. They stay put here but...
8th OTT - Well this is awkward. if we still have Chychrun you gotta think this would be an option.
9th DET - Another interesting spot. I personally don't think the DET prospect is top 5. Maybe I'm missing something. But the center depth looks questionable and they don't have many high end wingers outside of Raymond. So do they take a couple more stabs and trade back? Or do they take perceived higher end talent. I suspect they stay put.
10th PHI - How do the Flyers have more points than OTT and DET?! Torts is setting them back.
11th BUF - Probably want to begin turning the corner. If we have Chychrun I could see it. They have pick a ton the past couple years though so doubt they move back for more picks.
12th FLA/MTL - this could be the pick that MTL moves to get extra capital. They've really moved out anything of high end value so I can't see them getting another late 1st or 2nd. They also proved they are willing to grab players who are young and can play now.
13th STL - Could be like SJ last year where they want extra shots in this draft.
14th NSH - If they are still in win-now mood would a retained Schmaltz + Jenik get them to budge?
Hows that?
Not when he was drafted. Which is my point.I wouldn't consider Kadri small. I mean, he's not tree stump big, but he is 6', 192 lbs.
If we don’t win one do the lotteries, I think we’ll be doing a lot of arguing over Benson or Smith.
Fun fact: Benson has the same number of even strength points as Bedard this season.Heck, I think we'll be debating (the kinder, gentler version of arguing) unless we win 1st Overall. I hope there's no debate.
I like him a lot better than both, personally. And I had both in my top 12 last year. I think he’s more like a Cooley caliber prospect.Benson is a dynamic offensive player that drives the play for the Ice. Better than Geekie. Maybe better than Savoie.
Definitely a pass first winger.
Also a possibility if Schmaltz gets moved:Benson-Cooley-Guenther maybe would have a chance at being one of those elite super lines. Of course, Keller-Matthews-Schmaltz is going to be nice, too.
but he doesn't skate well...i'm done taking guys that have skating woesBenson is a dynamic offensive player that drives the play for the Ice. Better than Geekie. Maybe better than Savoie.
Definitely a pass first winger.