Prospect Info: 2023 Draft Thread (Yotes picking #6 & #12)

Status
Not open for further replies.

RedBeard

Registered User
Aug 16, 2005
101
92
Phoenix
Gotta be at 12, right? Benson, Yager, or Willander depending on who drops - if we believe the dinner outings aren't smoke. Shaping up to be an exciting Wednesday.
 

Llewzaher

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
4,860
2,338
North America
It is very intriguing

Michkov is gone before the 6th , then we should get Leonard **

if Michkov is there at 6.. we could take Dvorsky or Benson **

If Michkov is there and we trade with Washington , we get Dvorsky or Benson **

**= or the name that shall not be mentioned

Unless something Bizarre happens : SJ takes Michkov , MTL takes Leonard ... would we take Smith ?
 

GhostofYotesFan47

Registered User
Jun 16, 2012
4,177
2,105
Phoenix, Arizona USA
It is very intriguing

Michkov is gone before the 6th , then we should get Leonard **

if Michkov is there at 6.. we could take Dvorsky or Benson **

If Michkov is there and we trade with Washington , we get Dvorsky or Benson **

**= or the name that shall not be mentioned

Unless something Bizarre happens : SJ takes Michkov , MTL takes Leonard ... would we take Smith ?
Probably, and I wouldn't like it. He's likely a top 6 NHLer, but I dislike his way of playing the game. I'll probably change my mind in a year or 2.
 

RedBeard

Registered User
Aug 16, 2005
101
92
Phoenix
What’s the list of players we’ve wined and dined?
Scott Wheeler just said on the Athletic podcast that Arizona took Dvorsky, Reinbacher, Leonard, Willander, Benson, and Yager to dinners.

Wheeler said when he was writing he deep dive on Dvorsky, in doing his research, his AIK contacts said that the team that had been on Dvorsky the most all year was far and away “bar none” the Arizona Coyotes. And that plus the dinner they had with him makes it 50/50 they take Dvorsky. He believes they really, really like Dvorsky.



This was reportedly at the combine. Not sure what will happen this week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mosby

RedBeard

Registered User
Aug 16, 2005
101
92
Phoenix
If Michkov available at 6:

6 for 8 + Chesley + 40

??
As mentioned earlier in the thread, pushing for their protected first should be the first ask but I do like some players at 40 projected to be there this year. If you slot in a couple names it makes the drop down two spots interesting. Of course, this if we have ruled out Michkov.

6 for 8 (Dvorsky-C/W) + 40 (One of Hrabel-G, Wahlberg-C, Dvorak-LD, Nelson-C) + Chesley-RD +?
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
Ok so based on the dinners list I’m hoping for Dvorsky at 6 and Benson at 12
That would be awesome.

If Michkov available at 6:

6 for 8 + Chesley + 40

??
I think that’s an overpay by Washington. The value of just one of Chesley OR 40th I think is closer to my he correct add to 8th than is the combined value of Chesley AND 40th.
 

Llewzaher

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
4,860
2,338
North America
Maybe we trade up from 12
We definitely have the picks to do it….

I am thinking the only way would be to add picks and take on a bad contract (which we supposedly aren’t doing that) the only team I see us maybe being willing to would be Detroit.. St Louis I heard wants to move up .. No point with Vancouver as it’s only 1 spot. Washington wants to move up if Michkov is available

but I don’t know enough about other team‘s players and contracts like some of the others on this forum
 

lanky

Feeling Spicy
Jun 23, 2007
9,487
7,029
Winnipeg
If we were trading only picks to get from 12 to 7, what would it take?

12 + 38 + AZ 24 2nd?
12 + 38 + 70?

I guess I'd be on board if I liked the guy we were trading up for. I only "like" some of the possible targets.
 

AZviaNJ

“Sure as shit want to F*** Coyote fans.”
Mar 31, 2011
6,745
4,464
AZ
If we were trading only picks to get from 12 to 7, what would it take?

12 + 38 + AZ 24 2nd?
12 + 38 + 70?

I guess I'd be on board if I liked the guy we were trading up for. I only "like" some of the possible targets.
12 to 7 would cost the Coyotes ‘24 1st plus 38 possibly. 12 to 7 is a huge jump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad