I guarantee you I wouldn't regret it, because I'm not a member of the Church of Michkov. Everyone's extrapolating greatness from this kid and he's never even played a minute on North American ice. Every single assessment of his skill and future is speculative.
The only player I might have FOMO about is Bedard, and I've already resigned myself to not getting him. Everyone else in the range of our first pick is going to be in the same range of potential. Michkov is not generational enough of a player to justify the additional risks he represents.
If he's available in the late 1st round, I wouldn't mind at all packaging a bunch of our 2nds to trade up to get him. But our 1st and the Ottawa 1st should be spent on impact players with the lowest risk factors available.
We didn't have the opportunity to draft Crosby and Zetterberg wasn't a highly touted prospect. Those are also examples from damn near 20 years ago when we were a very different franchise and scouting wasn't as available as it is today, nor as good. I highly disagree with the bolded. Michkov is the only other player in this draft I'd be willing to potentially say is generational other than Bedard. The draft has literally been touted as Crosby and Ovechkin 2.0 for over a year.
I don't think it's weird to say that we regret not taking Marner over Strome, or Hughes over Hayton. Yes, these are made with hindsight and they aren't the end all be all, but that's the whole point, we can look back at the past with hindsight and see what happened. Nothing is guaranteed but from damn near every scout that has said what they think about his talent level they have him either 2nd or 3rd. Why the hell would we give the chance of drafting him at 7 or 12 up when that's the case? Because of speculation from biased sources? Because of the chance that he gets thrown in jail or the military and dies in Ukraine,? That he never comes over to play? Are those things possible? Sure! It's also possible that Bedard dies in a car crash tomorrow (1.35 million worldwide each year!), or that Fantilli gets Covid and is never the same hockey player again, or any other number of ridiculous things that could happen.
Not a single one of us has any idea what's going to happen in the future or can even make an educated guess. But we can make an educated guess about how a player's hockey career is going to path, so why aren't we relying on that? And in that metric Michkov is the 2nd best player in the draft in my opinion and in many others. There's already a TON of things that aren't guaranteed to happen with a hockey player, whether it be skating issues, or progression of their defense, or whatever, so I don't think throwing more shit into the pot and worrying about that is productive at all. At the end of the day even if things do end up like that we likely have his contract for 4 more years and his rights indefinitely.
I'd much rather have Michkov for 1 year after 4 years than have Cristall or anyone else in that range for 4 years after 4 years, as it is now.