Totally understand that, but the point remains that players who have played in the SHL are further along in their development tracks than players who haven't. Obviously this is inflated by having more higher end picks play in the SHL, but it is still a valid point. It seems that Yzerman and the development staff (Horcoff) prefer to have young players ripen on the vine against men. They even decided to move Cossa out of the CHL after one year. I am not saying the Wings will not and should not draft a top NA talent available to them on draft day, just saying if we have two picks in the first, and use both, one will likely be on a player who will be in the SHL next season for their development.
How many of those players continued to play in the USHL or CHL? Really only Hanas who was a late bloomer due to covid seasons and Cossa for one year. It seems the days of leaving "junior" players in the juniors are done? Maybe its just been good drafting and scouting, but Mazur, Savage, and James are all in the NCAA playing against players older than themselves and Cossa, who started the season at 19 yr old, has played pro hockey against men this entire year.
Yzerman all but said it last year at the draft; they draft prospects in part for their development trajectory and where they plan to play to facilitate the development on and off the ice. It seems he does not like CHL for a development pipeline. Lombardi and Hanas are really the only two notable picks in the past few years who played D+1 and D+2 years in the CHL, and in Lombardi's case it is because of his later development relative to his draft year and being an overager.
Speculate all you want as to why, but who can blame him? Hockey Canada has been shown to be a stellar organization recently (sarcasm), and this could be a reason why Yzerman choses to have players develop elsewhere.