OgeeOgelthorpe
Riccis per 60 record holder
- Feb 29, 2020
- 18,243
- 19,921
Maybe Coulson Pitre?
Point per game in Flint? How is his skating?
Maybe Coulson Pitre?
The top 4 are really the only picks worth making a move up to get. And those two picks wouldn't be enough, IMO. There is a number one with a bullet in Bedard. And there are 3 franchise level guys in Carlsson, Fantilli, and Michkov. After that, I don't think there is enough separation to warrant moving two 1sts to grab anyone. Just take two stabs at someone.Question for you guys.
*Since this draft is being touted as pretty deep*
Let's say we miss the playoffs, we get the pick anywhere in 12-15, we ended up trading Bertuzzi for a 1st (and others if possible) and that pick is anywhere between 16-32 (hope for 16); do you guys see a good reason to trade up in the draft with both 1sts or one of the 1sts + STL 2nd rounder for a higher pick?
With everyone saying this draft is stacked, I understand that having two picks in the first round would be extremely beneficial, but with our (recent) track record of early 1st rounders, I think I would be pretty okay with trading both of our 1sts for a top 8 pick.
You guys think that's worth it? Obviously, would prefer trading the new acquired 1st + STL 2nd for another top 15 pick, but a top 8 pick with our recent scouting success I think would "guarantee" a higher probability of a great player.
I see. Would love Fantilli.The top 4 are really the only picks worth making a move up to get. And those two picks wouldn't be enough, IMO. There is a number one with a bullet in Bedard. And there are 3 franchise level guys in Carlsson, Fantilli, and Michkov. After that, I don't think there is enough separation to warrant moving two 1sts to grab anyone. Just take two stabs at someone.
Question for you guys.
*Since this draft is being touted as pretty deep*
Let's say we miss the playoffs, we get the pick anywhere in 12-15, we ended up trading Bertuzzi for a 1st (and others if possible) and that pick is anywhere between 16-32 (hope for 16); do you guys see a good reason to trade up in the draft with both 1sts or one of the 1sts + STL 2nd rounder for a higher pick?
With everyone saying this draft is stacked, I understand that having two picks in the first round would be extremely beneficial, but with our (recent) track record of early 1st rounders, I think I would be pretty okay with trading both of our 1sts for a top 8 pick.
You guys think that's worth it? Obviously, would prefer trading the new acquired 1st + STL 2nd for another top 15 pick, but a top 8 pick with our recent scouting success I think would "guarantee" a higher probability of a great player.
so you saying theres a chance.I sincerely doubt that any of the teams in the top 10 this year would move down unless they plan on picking off board at that slot. Maybe a team run by idiots like Vancouver would consider it? But not most others.
so you saying theres a chance.
I think that is overall an ok deal, especially if we get another 1st rounder for bertuzzi. There just hasn't been much 15-32 1st round recent picks that amounted to elite level than top 10. Or am I bugging?There is a chance, but it's slim.
I think we'd be better off hedging our bets on getting another teens to early 20s first round pick. Or even trying to turn Detroit's own pick into multiple other picks.
Sample scenario: Let's say Detroit picks 12th and Vancouver has the 14th/15th overall pick from NYI. The Canucks might also get a pick in the 17-20 range from any of Pittsburgh, Winnipeg, Edmonton.
If Vancouver falls in love with a player at 12th overall then Detroit trades 12th overall for the 15th + 19th overall picks. There really is not a big drop in value in this years draft, in my opinion.
I think that is overall an ok deal, especially if we get another 1st rounder for bertuzzi. There just hasn't been much 15-32 1st round recent picks that amounted to elite level than top 10. Or am I bugging?
His skating is pretty good. I have to watch him again though.Point per game in Flint? How is his skating?
His skating is pretty good. I have to watch him again though.
No I would not trade up. This draft is deep insofar as there are four really good players at the top. After that it is closer to average than exceptional. You would need to get into the top four for it to be worth it, and no one is trading a top four pick this year for a couple mid 1st rounders.Question for you guys.
*Since this draft is being touted as pretty deep*
Let's say we miss the playoffs, we get the pick anywhere in 12-15, we ended up trading Bertuzzi for a 1st (and others if possible) and that pick is anywhere between 16-32 (hope for 16); do you guys see a good reason to trade up in the draft with both 1sts or one of the 1sts + STL 2nd rounder for a higher pick?
With everyone saying this draft is stacked, I understand that having two picks in the first round would be extremely beneficial, but with our (recent) track record of early 1st rounders, I think I would be pretty okay with trading both of our 1sts for a top 8 pick.
You guys think that's worth it? Obviously, would prefer trading the new acquired 1st + STL 2nd for another top 15 pick, but a top 8 pick with our recent scouting success I think would "guarantee" a higher probability of a great player.
This draft has just so many highly skilled prospects that I am not surprised so see him as a 2nd/3rd round guy. He's quite skilled but not elite. He's very physical with good skating but his production isn't great... it's not bad but it doesn't scream 1st rounder, especially in this draft. Like I said, I have to watch him more but I think he fits the mold of the type of player you said you were looking for, and rightfully so... we need more physical players imo.Why's he only ranked as a late 2nd/3rd round guy? How do you rate his skill?
Barlow, Leonard, Sale, Danielson, Cristall. I think hoping for Smith to be there is too much to ask. Would love Benson too.My highly-scientific, well-thought-out projections now show the Wings will be picking 10th in the 2023 draft. To you prospect-watchers, who are we taking in that spot? Who are we hoping realistically falls to us?
The one I would like them to get most is Moore. Don't know if he'll be there at 10, though.Barlow, Leonard, Sale, Danielson, Cristall. I think hoping for Smith to be there is too much to ask.
My personal preference would be we get 1 of Moore, Dvorsky, or Sale.My highly-scientific, well-thought-out projections now show the Wings will be picking 10th in the 2023 draft. To you prospect-watchers, who are we taking in that spot? Who are we hoping realistically falls to us?
Gotta offload Bert on someone. Sucks that Dallas gave up their 1st earlier in the year. Carolina maybe?I won't doubt what Yzerman does with these picks (trades or whatever) but let's just say that having 5 picks in the top ~45 in this draft is crazy good because I think this draft has insane value in the first 2 rounds. I'm so glad that Yzerman decided to get some more draft capital for this one in particular. Can't wait for the draft.