tade
Registered User
Hi guys, was anything said on the czech TV about Koch's hit in the sense that it was illegal because he made no attempt to play the puck? See quote of my post from the GDT below.
Koch's hit on the czech player broke their brains.
I've noticed a lot of Czech comments about the supposed illegality (ref was right there, he saw it perfectly and it was absolutely clean) of Koch's great hit focus on the fact that the Koch made no attempt to play the puck. I mean like not just clueless people commenting on the internet and parroting what they heard somewhere, but also sports journalists in their articles.
Makes absolutely no sense. Makes me wonder, was something like this said on the czech broadcast? That it was illegal because Koch made no attempt to play the puck? Have they never watched hockey before? Do they not know the rules? It really just feels like they're grasping at straws - they know it wasn't late, they know it wasn't charging, they know he didn't raise his hands and they know their player was skating with his head down, so they made up some nonsense about not playing the puck.
In another bizzare turn of the events, the czech team even admitted that they proactively contacted the IIHF to review this situation, even though they do so automatically and input from teams is not required. As I said, that hit broke their brains.
I can confirm it, pretty much exactly what was said on the Czech broadcast right after the hit (Záruba, Pospíšil - most experienced commentators). And they are usually quite good and not biased.
I don't know, I was also surprised by their comments. Maybe they are just not used to see hits like this on international level anymore. It was really huge hit with a lot of impact, but yeah, clean hit. That was intense 1st period! Great game.