Colton's puck management has been absolutely horrifying at times. He makes passes and other decisions with the puck that just make me want to throw things at the screen. I'm pretty sure it was a terrible pass from him to MacKinnon that led to the turnover and Kraken rush that eventually led to the GWG for Seattle (and we all know what Colton did there).IDK... I think the jury is still out. Colton has been trash way more often than not, and the same with Wood. They may skate fast in a straight line and hit, but that's all they can really do (when apparently not playing New Jersey). They don't maintain the puck, they don't win battles all that often... they simply move the puck, dump it, couple hits, then go off for a change. That's not what the Avs were built on. They were built on maintaining the puck and keeping pressure. Not grind teams.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I'll give them a bit of leeway when the instructions provided to them are "so you've got 1 dollar to fix a 10 dollar issue, good luck!".
I think it further highlights how badly the amateur scouts have done over the years where there is virtually no one that can come up and be cheap depth.
I think you need someone that is good at managing the puck to play with Colton and Wood. Both are chaos monsters, but they are not good distributors. If we managed to get Kane he'd actually be the perfect addition for them. Those guys would create space for him, and he could be the guy on that line.Colton's puck management has been absolutely horrifying at times. He makes passes and other decisions with the puck that just make me want to throw things at the screen. I'm pretty sure it was a terrible pass from him to MacKinnon that led to the turnover and Kraken rush that eventually led to the GWG for Seattle (and we all know what Colton did there).
He kinda strikes me as a faster, meaner Johnny Mitchell, which makes for a perfectly fine player, but not one you want centering your third line.
This is the worry. If he was a middle 6 winger or centering the 4th line, that dumb shit wouldn't matter as much. As the pivot of a line that's going to be around 12 minutes 5v5 and as the primary puck handler on the line... it is unsustainable.Colton's puck management has been absolutely horrifying at times. He makes passes and other decisions with the puck that just make me want to throw things at the screen. I'm pretty sure it was a terrible pass from him to MacKinnon that led to the turnover and Kraken rush that eventually led to the GWG for Seattle (and we all know what Colton did there).
He kinda strikes me as a faster, meaner Johnny Mitchell, which makes for a perfectly fine player, but not one you want centering your third line.
Pretty much zero chance Kane would come here to play with those two.I think you need someone that is good at managing the puck to play with Colton and Wood. Both are chaos monsters, but they are not good distributors. If we managed to get Kane he'd actually be the perfect addition for them. Those guys would create space for him, and he could be the guy on that line.
Oh no, Kane is not that type of player anymore, and his nonexistent defensive game would be a disastrous fit with those two, as neither of them are nowhere near good enough defensively to cover for him.I think you need someone that is good at managing the puck to play with Colton and Wood. Both are chaos monsters, but they are not good distributors. If we managed to get Kane he'd actually be the perfect addition for them. Those guys would create space for him, and he could be the guy on that line.
Tatar also did that in Montreal with arguably one of the best pure defensive centers in the league.Oh no, Kane is not that type of player anymore, and his nonexistent defensive game would be a disastrous fit with those two, as neither of them are nowhere near good enough defensively to cover for him.
No...the guy I was hoping would click with them is Tatar, and for a brief time it kinda worked. In his prime I think it absolutely would have as he was a puck management king in Montreal.
Cap dump for TBL to add someone? Kane?
By any chance, was that center Jonathan Drouin?Tatar also did that in Montreal with arguably one of the best pure defensive centers in the league.
No, they have not.Mack and Makar have both said there are too many changes and new players.
Ryan Johansen 4 mil
Ross Colton 4 mil
Miles Wood 2.5 mil
Tomas Tatar 1.5 mil
Jonathan Drouin 875k
Jack Johnson 775k
13,650,000 mil = 19 points
JT Compher 5.1 mil
Evan Rodriques 3.0 mil
Alex Newhook 2.9 mil
Lars Eller 2.450 mil
Erik Johnson 3.250 mil
16,700,000 mil = 34 points
I think we dropped the ball big time. Sometimes making changes for the sake of making changes never works
Lehkonen- Mackinnon- Rantanen
Rodriques- Compher- Nichushkin
Newhook- Eller- O'Connor
Tufte- Olofsson- Cogliano
Toews - Makar
Byram - Manson
2 mil - EJ
I think I'd rather take that lineup than what we have. Mack and Makar have both said there are too many changes and new players. There's no chemistry.
In this scenario Girard would have had to go but we would assume to bring in another Dman for 2 mil for the difference of his contract.
The points at this particular point of the season is completely pointless. Beyond that though, they made changes because the team last year simply wasn't good enough to win the Cup (or even close). Coming back for round 2 of that would have been a failure. This season's risk/reward play also may not pan out... but changes were absolutely needed.
For the 100th time...Nichushkin and Manson were not playing vs Seattle. If they did we win that series and then who knows what happens.
That healthy lineup I proposed could beat anyone.
Anyone else feel like they are kind of fed-up with the whole stagnant cap situation?Guy sat around all summer and ended up signing a cheap deal... nobody is moving any real assets to get him. Maybe if you waive him, but not even sure then with the performance he's had. Teams will simply look at him and think he'd probably do even worse on their teams. Gotta play out of his funk.
The Avs are going to have to play around with the fringes of the lineup and maybe call up/waive players... but as a whole, they kinda just have to figure it out with who they got until January. Given the schedule, that should be fine... but will be frustrating at times.
IF JTC, ERod, Newy, Eller and EJ were all on the same team putting up those points you might have a point. Individually each and everyone one of them can serve a real good purpose for a team. Collectively, they will sink you.Ryan Johansen 4 mil
Ross Colton 4 mil
Miles Wood 2.5 mil
Tomas Tatar 1.5 mil
Jonathan Drouin 875k
Jack Johnson 775k
13,650,000 mil = 19 points
JT Compher 5.1 mil
Evan Rodriques 3.0 mil
Alex Newhook 2.9 mil
Lars Eller 2.450 mil
Erik Johnson 3.250 mil
16,700,000 mil = 34 points
I think we dropped the ball big time. Sometimes making changes for the sake of making changes never works
Lehkonen- Mackinnon- Rantanen
Rodriques- Compher- Nichushkin
Newhook- Eller- O'Connor
Tufte- Olofsson- Cogliano
Toews - Makar
Byram - Manson
2 mil - EJ
I think I'd rather take that lineup than what we have. Mack and Makar have both said there are too many changes and new players. There's no chemistry.
In this scenario Girard would have had to go but we would assume to bring in another Dman for 2 mil for the difference of his contract.
I don't feel that way personally as the alternative to this escrow and payback period would have been to go the NFL route and have a pull back on the cap. That would have been WAY worse for the NHL. 20-21 would have been roughly a 75m cap and 21-22 in the realm of 55-60m. With a large jump back to 83m last year and this year being close to 87m. Yeah that'd be better today... but those first two years would have lead to an exodus from the Avs far worse than the 04-05 lockout.Anyone else feel like they are kind of fed-up with the whole stagnant cap situation?
Yep...and we just happen to have two guys that can do that work, which is why it makes so much sense to break Nate and Mikko up at 5v5. They'll still have plenty of PP time to over pass with.
It just seems so obvious to me...
X-Nate-Nuke
Lehky-RyJo-Rants
You could even swap Nuke and Lehky if you wanted to load the beef on a line or move Lehky up and bring in Tufte to play LW with RyJo and Nuke for another beefy lineup.
I don't think it's a misfiring. They were clearly budget options.
They'll most likely wait until the deadline when Tufte will have replaced Drouin, Tatar will get buried and replaced by Kovalenko, and they'll probably snag a forward or two for cheap with money retained. They'll make it work.
If Drouin or Tatar are dressed in the playoffs, something has gone horribly wrong and we are getting bounced early.
Not saying they’re the same but the enthusiasm for Kovalenko is somewhat reminiscent of the enthusiasm for signing Meyers.
There's a reason Tampa didn't want Colton as their 3C. And a reason Wood was used as a fourth liner.Ryan Johansen 4 mil
Ross Colton 4 mil
Miles Wood 2.5 mil
Tomas Tatar 1.5 mil
Jonathan Drouin 875k
Jack Johnson 775k
13,650,000 mil = 19 points
JT Compher 5.1 mil
Evan Rodriques 3.0 mil
Alex Newhook 2.9 mil
Lars Eller 2.450 mil
Erik Johnson 3.250 mil
16,700,000 mil = 34 points
I think we dropped the ball big time. Sometimes making changes for the sake of making changes never works
Lehkonen- Mackinnon- Rantanen
Rodriques- Compher- Nichushkin
Newhook- Eller- O'Connor
Tufte- Olofsson- Cogliano
Toews - Makar
Byram - Manson
2 mil - EJ
I think I'd rather take that lineup than what we have. Mack and Makar have both said there are too many changes and new players. There's no chemistry.
In this scenario Girard would have had to go but we would assume to bring in another Dman for 2 mil for the difference of his contract.
Oh, I'm not disagreeing at all. The owners actually went above and beyond by getting us some semblance of hockey back on the ice as soon as medically, politically and socially allowed.I don't feel that way personally as the alternative to this escrow and payback period would have been to go the NFL route and have a pull back on the cap. That would have been WAY worse for the NHL. 20-21 would have been roughly a 75m cap and 21-22 in the realm of 55-60m. With a large jump back to 83m last year and this year being close to 87m. Yeah that'd be better today... but those first two years would have lead to an exodus from the Avs far worse than the 04-05 lockout.
One of the reasons we have ownership crying poor like in Winnipeg is essentially the owners footed the bill from the first covid shutdown until the Avs won the Cup. IIRC in 20-21, the owners actually paid more in raw salaries than they brought in for the whole season in HRR.