I like the kid but hes played 113 games and had some glaring holes to address. Putting up decent numbers for 1 season and then getting hurt and missing 73 games isnt exactly a proven history of anything that would warrant giving him a long term deal.
He has the potential to be a PP stud. He has the potential to address his defensive liabilities. He has the potential to not be hampered by injuries. I just want to see it before I pay the guy.
I think the team should want more information to go off of and not risk paying a guy 10x what hes worth and potentially hurting the team long term because you gave out a stupid contract. Id rather be sure we are paying the right guy the $$, especially considering the kind of talent we have coming along.
I think with the two extremes, high scoring rookie season and a lost season due to injury, the org should try to sign Drysdale long term on the cheap.
Theodore's ELC ended in 2018-19 and Vegas signed him to a 7-year contract worth $5.2 mil AAV. Theodore is mostly offense and that's where Drysdale is right now, but Drysdale was producing well earlier in his hockey career than Theodore.
Could you imagine signing Drysdale to a 7-year contract worth $4.5-$5.5 mil AAV?
This is why Drysdale shouldn't take that deal. Do a bridge deal to where he can show he can stay healthy and put up points consistently. Drysdale could make far more than $5.5 mil AAV if he's that productive offensively and defensively on a bridge deal.
Drysdale's injury was a torn labrum in his left shoulder. His skating shouldn't be an issue and he's a fast skater. With a season off and has been working out in the summer, Drysdale should be in great physical health this year. The unknown is how behind his skills are for missing a season of hockey and how long it will take him to match or surpass his previous play.