robbieboy3686
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2016
- 2,999
- 2,035
Speculation: 2023-24 Roster Thread
- Thread starter Leonardo87
- Start date
- Status
MMC
Global Moderator
Boo Boo
Registered User
- Jan 31, 2013
- 2,279
- 2,499
I think we would all be too worried about byram injury history to really consider that.
Especially since we have offensive d coming up and the fact that the players available at the #2 pick are perfect fits for our roster.
Perratrooper
Registered User
Smirnov2Chistov
EEK!
I hate to be that guy, but seeing everyone plug in Fantilli and think that’s the answer is surprising.
We need some physicality up and down the lineup. Don’t think it makes sense to keep Henrique to me.. we need some different looks/pieces in those spots.
If not; I still think we get pushed around and we will still be having this discussion come season time
We need some physicality up and down the lineup. Don’t think it makes sense to keep Henrique to me.. we need some different looks/pieces in those spots.
If not; I still think we get pushed around and we will still be having this discussion come season time
Hockey Duckie
Registered User
Milano's QO was only $1.8 mil, not that we couldn't afford it. Milano scored 34 points in 66 NHL games for the Ducks (0.52 ppg) and -9 rating. Verbeek said we couldn't afford Milano's (and Steel's) services, which we know he was being polite. In FA, Verbeek signed Vatrano and Vatrano scored 41 points in 81 games ( 0.51 ppg) and -29 rating. We paid Vatrano $3.65 mil AAV for three years.
Anyhow, pointing out that Benoit being on that video interview and sending a message to the fans implies that he's got the heads up we're keeping him since there's no official word Benoit is being re-signed.
DavidBL
Registered User
I think you probably keep Rico until the TDL. I think the team needs him this year.
jiggsawpuzzle35
Registered User
Let me direct you to the basement with the guy with the red stapler.
LePerilsofPerreault
Registered User
Zegras-Fantilli-X
X-McTavish-Terry
Lundestrom-Gaucher-X
Need to fill in the blanks for the future
X-McTavish-Terry
Lundestrom-Gaucher-X
Need to fill in the blanks for the future
Hamilton Bulldogs
Registered User
- Jan 11, 2022
- 4,030
- 5,780
LePerilsofPerreault
Registered User
Not willing to pencil him in but i’m hopeful. Would be cool to see him with Fantilli and Z.
TopShelfWaterBottle
Registered
- Mar 16, 2014
- 3,420
- 1,439
How far into the future are we talking because we have Strome for another four years
LePerilsofPerreault
Registered User
Just who i’d plan building on for the future. Strome will be useful but most likely can go at some point.
Alexis is really good, love these. Also, this kind of confirms the speculation that McTavish and others do not go to the Worlds because they're in the team-mandated (?) training
Just because everyone admires his physicality, doesn't mean he isn't great offensively. He just outcored everyone in NCAA, arguably more impressive than Eichel did it.
91Fedorov
John (Gibson) 3:16
- Dec 30, 2013
- 1,356
- 1,004
I hope Regenda gets a real shot next year. Every line he played on, he seemed to make the line better. I think he's a better bottom 6'er than some of the guys we were icing.
- Sep 21, 2018
- 3,805
- 6,023
Seems like he gets lost in the discussion a bit after being sent down. The problem is there's a bit of a logjam on the left side (Henrique, Vatrano, Jones, McGinn, and Nesterenko) even without including Comtois.
It wouldn't surprise me if he finds his way onto the roster for a while after injuries start to mount though.
The Midnight Burrito
True Fan
Oh right, McGinn.
Hockey Duckie
Registered User
I hope McTavish and Terry have better chemistry on the ice going forward. I like Z with Terry far more than McTavish-Terry at the moment.
- Sep 21, 2018
- 3,805
- 6,023
For 2 more years, no less.
Pittsburgh missing the playoffs makes me feel a little better about that trade, lol.
- Sep 21, 2018
- 3,805
- 6,023
Pittsburgh missing the playoffs makes me a feel a little better.
I put an extra "a" in there, sounded like Super Mario making that comment. lol.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 41,728
- 38,075
Our need for another top 6 player is much higher than our need for Byram. As someone else mentioned the injury history isnt exactly appealing.
We have plenty of dmen coming up, we lack forwards.
Newhook doesnt move the needle at all, hes sam steel level of a player.... and we let sam steel walk for free.
- Status
