bauer
I MISS GHOST
- Nov 11, 2007
- 4,634
- 4,850
Zero players who scored 80+ points this year did so without a team mate who also scored 60+.
Again, put Konecny on a team with at least one other high end talent (and a functional PP) and he’s an 80+ point player. Very few players in the top 30 would have had close to the point totals they had if they were in Konecny’s situation.
that's because those high end players make the others around them better. it just proves the point even more that TK shouldn't be given a crazy contract when he can't elevate his teammates.
interestingly enough though, last year Keller managed to put up 86 points without any elite talent around him. 2nd on the Coyotes was Schmaltz with 58. it can be done. i don't see TK as a 80-90 point player unless he's got a superstar C like McDavid feeding him.
You’re not going to convince me that Konecny “doesn’t fit”. He’s 27. “Approaching 30” and being… actually 30 is a difference of three years in this case.
Unless we’re getting a top 10 quality prospect for him, the odds of coming out ahead in a Konecny trade over the next ~six years is not high in my view.
I’d be more interested in trying to land a Brady Tkachuk or Martin Necas at or before the draft without losing Konecny. Then in the next ~three years, you’ll need Michkov, Bonk, Barkey, and this years 12th OV to hit, and you can possibly have a competitive roster construction. If we can get an impact defenseman out of this coming draft, I think you’re actually in a position to make it work *if* Briere is shrewd enough to supplement the roster opportunistically. In a lot of ways, that’s the most critical piece. Finding players like Devon Toews and Gus Forsling is what distinguishes the elite teams from the ones who can’t take that step.
TK's next contract years will be ages 28-36. assuming it's 8 years. how many of those will he even he good? he's closer to Atkinson than Giroux, and look how fast he fell off. Atkinson was putting up very similar numbers to TK 5 years ago. 30 goals, 60 points. injuries played a role but why would we think TK would be that much different? so we pay him for the years when the team is nowhere near a contender? makes no sense.
it's not just about what you get back for TK in a trade either. the cap space is more important than the return. that 9m or so could be used to bring in a 1C/1D. what if a player like Eichel becomes available again in the next year or two? we won't have the money to try and trade for them because we'll be spending 2/3 of our cap on wingers.