volnoir
Registered User
- Nov 13, 2015
- 334
- 461
Seattle has taken the depth approach in that they will hit you with 4 lines of 2nd line players and overwhelm you by creating bad match ups (not saying the Flyers are currently that team are near that). They showed last year that with the slightest bit of decent goaltending they could take on the top teams in the league. They took Dallas to game 7 which ended 2-1.There is no 1D on the team. Nothing even close to that on the back end. It’s a bunch of secondary filler, and while I am no hater of is, I sure as shit won’t pencil Sanheim as a mothership of that defense for a Stanley cup run.
The forward ranks feature a Couturier with very valid health/mileage questions moving forward, and Travis Konecny.
There is nothing here aside from that other than vanilla secondary junk that can be found on every team. They need a lot more in the way of high end talent, and I really hope they recognize that.
They are trying to, and will try to win as they obsess over. With overwhelming depth, and that mystical effort.
It’s a constant sidestep, and excuse from the FO of this team to ignore the elephant in the room being a relatively low amount of talent compared to the top teams.
Hell even the most Neanderthal way to illustrate that. Everyone plays fantasy hockey, how many Flyers are in a league? Maybe two in TK, and Hart? How many Flyers are in the top 50 of NHL point producers when seasons end? They don’t need a Draisaitl, or Hedman - but what’s here that’s even close to a tier below that?
High end talent very much remains a fatal flaw they fail to address, trying to find ways to avoid that truly evil rebuild.
There is more than 1 road to the cup. Having high end talent helps, but so does really strong depth which creates massive match-up problems.