Starat327
Top .01% OnlyHands
This is just saying a Defenseman is valuable because he plays 25 Minutes a night.
A Wiseman here once said "I have only myself to blame."
This is just saying a Defenseman is valuable because he plays 25 Minutes a night.
Who could have predicted that trading 3 picks for DeAngelo and giving him a $10m contract wouldn't work out well.
A defenseman who plays 25 minutes a night is valuable, b/c he's unlikely to do so unless he's clearly better than the 3rd pair D-men who'd play more minutes. This is similar to why starting pitchers who go deep into games have value just by being durable, b/c it saves your bullpen.
Yeah, it’s tough to tell who’s more to blame, the Flyers’ scouting or their developmental team, maybe both. At this point I don’t trust them and just want blue chip prospects with pedigree. I’d take my chance thereA non-tank could potentially work, but only if a) the Flyers GM and scouts identify the high-end talent that multiple other organizations didn't and b) the Flyers system develops this talent to the player's ceiling. What gives us any confidence that they can do either of these things well? They have failed much more than succeeded with volume drafting, trading assets to move up, and receiving additional draft picks to move back.
This is a myth. Outside of Vancouver, he lasted 7 years in TB, 5 in NY, 6 in CBJ.
Compare to say Gallant, who's been fired in his 3rd season by 3 teams.
Laviolette, 5 years CAR, 5 years Phl, 6 Nash, 3 Wash.
Torts seems to work best with rebuilding teams where there isn't a coterie of entrenched veterans who don't want to be pushed.
Come on Torts isn't going to be a vindictive prick. We know he isn't.Yeah, I typically shit talk my boss in public spaces. Not sure why these cowards arent.
He's not AV. For one thing, he loves dogs. So you know he's decent at heart.Come on Torts isn't going to be a vindictive prick. We know he isn't.
He also got kicked by a horse ....He's not AV. For one thing, he loves dogs. So you know he's decent at heart.
Nah, that makes sense.Just watched Farabee on Nasty Knuckles. Apparently he doesn't view this as a rebuild and doesn't think that they are far off. Also seems to really appreciate the brutal honesty that Torts is treating them with.
I'm more and more getting the sense that the situation inside the locker room is very different from what is speculated on here.
Why would Farabee, a current player on this team, say anything different?Just watched Farabee on Nasty Knuckles. Apparently he doesn't view this as a rebuild and doesn't think that they are far off. Also seems to really appreciate the brutal honesty that Torts is treating them with.
I'm more and more getting the sense that the situation inside the locker room is very different from what is speculated on here.
Exactly. Only the gullible would believe what Farabee said.Was there not a big story where Farabee’s agent went to management and complained about his usage? That he didn’t ask for a trade, but he was unhappy with Tortorella?
What an active player says in a podcast about his current team is a big whatever.
Can we hire him for just the lottery ball luck?O'Connor wrote an article today talking about the 4 rumored candidates (Shero, Wilson, Mellanby, Poulin), and it felt like the "This is Fine" meme.
He was also weirdly complimentary of Shero in the article/comments, writing shit like this:
View attachment 697136
He didn't. Sullivan wasn't even hired as an AHL coach until the year after Shero was canned. He didn't even hire Johnston. Charlie just totally mixed up Shero and Rutherford's tenure. Shero made 3 coaching hires in his managerial career. He re-signed Therrien, replaced him with Bylsma (6 years), and in Jersey hired Hynes (5 years). That's it. He also never mentioned the Fletcher connection, where Fletcher was AGM/advisor to Shero in Pittsburgh and Jersey. When you really dive into his career, you realize what a totally mediocre HockeyGuy™ he is. Inheriting generational talents, lottery ball luck, and an ability to unshackle 2 Cup contenders immediately upon his absence -- that is Ray Shero.
Only if he's let go immediately thereafter. I don't want this team to get any more Penguin on it than it has to.Can we hire him for just the lottery ball luck?
Of the four guys mentioned in COC’s article, Shero is the guy with whom I would really have a problem. IDK about Mellanby. Poulin or Wilson would be fine.O'Connor wrote an article today talking about the 4 rumored candidates (Shero, Wilson, Mellanby, Poulin), and it felt like the "This is Fine" meme.
He was also weirdly complimentary of Shero in the article/comments, writing shit like this:
View attachment 697136
He didn't. Sullivan wasn't even hired as an AHL coach until the year after Shero was canned. He didn't even hire Johnston. Charlie just totally mixed up Shero and Rutherford's tenure. Shero made 3 coaching hires in his managerial career. He re-signed Therrien, replaced him with Bylsma (6 years), and in Jersey hired Hynes (5 years). That's it. He also never mentioned the Fletcher connection, where Fletcher was AGM/advisor to Shero in Pittsburgh and Jersey. When you really dive into his career, you realize what a totally mediocre HockeyGuy™ he is. Inheriting generational talents, lottery ball luck, and an ability to unshackle 2 Cup contenders immediately upon his absence -- that is Ray Shero.
Of the four guys mentioned in COC’s article, Shero is the guy with whom I would really have a problem. IDK about Mellanby. Poulin or Wilson would be fine.
Wilson has a nice body of work which can be evaluated as successful. The only thing with him is the situation with his health. I was in Milwaukee when he was with the Hawks. The general feeling about him was that he was a stand up guy; a hard worker who kept his nose clean which was not easy with that club at that time. He’d blend in well with the current people in the FO of the Flyers.
Coaches trashing their players? Whole other story.Players are not going to trash their coach management or their teammates in public . People on here thinking they will or are are morons .