Colt.45Orr
Registered User
Should pick up Sabourin as a13th forward insert down the stretch. 14g in 50 AHL games and forechecks very hard.
If you do sign Hanifin you could also look at trading McAvoy before his NMC-NTC kicks in. (Just saying)You’re right, Lindholm would be better to move if they wanted to go that route, for the reason you stated.
But, at least for the first couple of years, they could go:
Hanifin - McAvoy
Lindholm - FA or Trade Acquisition
Lohrei - Regula/Wotherspoon
Having three top four quality defensemen on one side, spread out among all three pairs can be a good thing.
I mean yeah kinda. Trades are part of the reality of the business, these guys get compensated better then most people could dream of to play a silly little game and one of the things that comes with that is having to potentially be included in trades.Oh so uprooting someone’s family is ok for lesser players?
Should pick up Sabourin as a13th forward insert down the stretch. 14g in 50 AHL games and forechecks very hard.
if this ends in a contract termination between him and the caps, I'd take him on a prove it deal. The talent is undeniably there with him, if a change in scenery can get him motivated again then I think it's worth a shot.
probably not. But if Kuzy decides he doesn't want to report to the AHL maybe they come to a mutual termination.I dont see them eating that big ass contract, imo
Agreed. Although they’d need to insulate Lohrei for at least another season. He’s going to need a stay at home vet skating with himYou’re right, Lindholm would be better to move if they wanted to go that route, for the reason you stated.
But, at least for the first couple of years, they could go:
Hanifin - McAvoy
Lindholm - FA or Trade Acquisition
Lohrei - Regula/Wotherspoon
Having three top four quality defensemen on one side, spread out among all three pairs can be a good thing.
Why?? Am I missing something, is Hanifin a right side dman? I assumed he was left sideIf you do sign Hanifin you could also look at trading McAvoy before his NMC-NTC kicks in. (Just saying)
McAvoy is a top 5 dman is the league, you don't trade that guy to make room for someone who is worse and older.If you do sign Hanifin you could also look at trading McAvoy before his NMC-NTC kicks in. (Just saying)
True.probably not. But if Kuzy decides he doesn't want to report to the AHL maybe they come to a mutual termination.
Other then that the only way I take a flier on him in if the Caps pay for double retention, which would bring him cap hit to a smidge under 2mil.
No Hanifin is a LH defensemen. Just looking at all options if they do sign for him. Bruins would roughly have $24 million in 3 defensemen with NTC's That's roughly 29% of your cap.Why?? Am I missing something, is Hanifin a right side dman? I assumed he was left side
You do if you want a first line center and cap relief.McAvoy is a top 5 dman is the league, you don't trade that guy to make room for someone who is worse and older.
If I had to choose between a 1st line center (that isn't untouchable) and McAvoy, I would choose Chuckie. We have seen year in and year out what the Leafs can do with elite offence and trash defenders. I want no part of that, build from the net out.You do if you want a first line center and cap relief.
Taylor Hall was here for 2 and a half seasons. Backes was barely a useful player, do you really not see the difference between say trading Bergeron after 20 years of taking paycuts and building the culture vs trading someone like Derek Forbort?Chara ended up leaving a couple years later anyways. And yes keyword workplace because it’s a business. Those relationships don’t come to an end because a team or player moved on. These are adults they should understand. That entire narrative is so insanely overblown.
I mean does Taylor hall, David backes, etc now hold a grudge against the bruins for trading them and ruined all relations?
I don't know much about FLA's prospect pool, there might be some interesting pieces in the farm. But after Calgary got hosed on that Huberdeau deal, I have a hard time believing the Flames would prefer to deal with Florida on this one. Smells like Florida just raising the prices on their direct competitors.Makes you wonder what's Florida giving up, the flames already have their 2025 first and the Panthers don't have this years first. 2026 plus/plus ?
I think you nailed it! Along with Conroy possibly trying to put pressure on the likely suitors and after Markstrom publicly chastising Conroy, I think Craig maybe swinging for a Grandslam with the bases empty, should be interesting.I don't know much about FLA's prospect pool, there might be some interesting pieces in the farm. But after Calgary got hosed on that Huberdeau deal, I have a hard time believing the Flames would prefer to deal with Florida on this one. Smells like Florida just raising the prices on their direct competitors.