FrankerC
Registered User
He says it around the 5:30 mark in this audio:If this is true...hell yah go for it!
Dreger on Dubas' revamped vision in Pittsburgh, the Penguins unlocking the market and the Flames commanding the high price
He says it around the 5:30 mark in this audio:If this is true...hell yah go for it!
I think too many people simplify this. Like teams will just take other UFAs for their UFA. Calgary doesn’t need to do this unless we give up value, and we have to beat out any other team offer to Calgary.This isn’t hard. Grizz or Forbort goes back to make the money work. Then you have whatever assets you are trading for Hanifin (or whomever).
Do you think Calgary wants either of them?
Would you want the Bruins to acquire either of them?
I think too many people simplify this. Like teams will just take other UFAs for their UFA. Calgary doesn’t need to do this unless we give up value, and we have to beat out any other team offer to Calgary.
The bruins will be looking to add d not subtract.If the Bruins were sellers they'd have no problem trading Gryz or Forbort at the deadline.
They can be flipped elsewhere. This isn't that complicated really.
They will to make a deal. In todays world you have to take money back in order to sell. Like Craig Smith going to Washington last year.I think too many people simplify this. Like teams will just take other UFAs for their UFA. Calgary doesn’t need to do this unless we give up value, and we have to beat out any other team offer to Calgary.
I think too many people simplify this. Like teams will just take other UFAs for their UFA. Calgary doesn’t need to do this unless we give up value, and we have to beat out any other team offer to Calgary.
Not trading Carlo, to make room for Carrier.........With the Bruins being rumored to be interested in Alexandre Carrier, I wonder if a Carlo for Hanifin deal makes sense for both teams. Calgary gets a Tanev replacement signed for 3 more seasons so they can move Tanev for picks and still compete this season and onward. For the Bruins, they solidify their top 4 and Lindholm has always played better with more of a puck-moving defenseman on his pair.
The big question is what is Calgary looking for in a return for Hanifin? If they are looking at a rebuild, they will probably want picks and prospects in return which the Bruins could not afford to give up or pay with so many teams interested in Hanifin already.
The goal would be to get Hanifin and replace Carlo with another 4D in Carrier. Just spit-balling since E. Lindholm, with an extension, and Carrier were two players named the Bruins to be interested in thus far. It could also just mean that the Bruins want to bolster their RD by replacing Shattenkirk with someone better. Should be an interesting two weeks.Not trading Carlo, to make room for Carrier.........
Bruins should not be going after another undersized d-manThe goal would be to get Hanifin and replace Carlo with another 4D in Carrier. Just spit-balling since E. Lindholm, with an extension, and Carrier were two players named the Bruins to be interested in thus far. It could also just mean that the Bruins want to bolster their RD by replacing Shattenkirk with someone better. Should be an interesting two weeks.
Well he's not going to be here after July 1 or whatever, many people expect that, or does he mean the deadline?From Dom in the DeBrusk thread
From @DomT "
Disagree.
Days are numbered in Boston.
Details later this afternoon or early evening. Depends on how quickly I can get in front of a pc"
Player Discussion - Jake DeBrusk VIII
I have read countless posts on Jake and I think most posters are very limited on there Knowledge. (not to be rude). The first question and really the only relevant question is does DeBrusk want to remain a Bruin after this year and if so at what cap hit???? (I am sure DS has a pretty good idea...forums.hfboards.com
I took days to mean trade deadlineWell he's not going to be here after July 1 or whatever, many people expect that, or does he mean the deadline?
Ok, I did as well, wanted to make sure I was thinking along the same linesI took days to mean trade deadline
Dougie for me
We should buy low in Ruzicka loved Rosie back in the day and he is big.
Yeah just more talking about frame/playing style than anything else. Dougie definitely has the higher pedigree. Lohrei hasn’t been playing D for too long though so we will see how much developmental runway he has left, could be more than most players his age (especially since some bigger players seem to take a little time to get coordinated and effectively use their size too)Yeah closest comp. But Dougie was already in his second season in Calgary when he was Lorhei's age and scoring at double the PPG. Development isn't linear and who knows and all, just pointing it out.
Where is the Ullmark rumour?If the rumors are true about Debrusk/Ullmark potentially on the move. I hope it somehow it’s for a center and we bring up lysell.
Where is the Ullmark rumour?
rumor or speculation in eye of the beholder. And gets more hazy this time of year
Yes.To the "not trade Ullmark until the offseason crowd"
Would you consider it if Swayman had an extension in place, it guaranteed a 1st + coming back, and it was proceeded to be flipped for either a top four defenseman or a top six forward. Let's say Hanifin for example (with an extension as well)
Curious if it swings anyone to the other side because I think it's the exact course they should take
honestly impressive how dumb these guys are with social media. i know booger sugar is common in the league but to record yourself and then accidentally upload it to your public account is impressive