The guy with 4 goals in 7 playoff games last year who’s sitting at #5 in playoff goals for LWs since he broke into the league is only getting a late second. Interesting.I don't think JDB would return anything more than a late second round pick: he is too streaky to return a better package. That being said, I think it's time to move on.
He's our Noah Hanifin...I’ve been told by 2 different sources Bruins ’are getting calls on JDB’…..but…..’the potential offers are underwhelming’.
fwiw.
Kunin and Burroughs make a ton of sense. That's a solid start to bringing in some more team toughness. If we can actually land Hanifin and keep Lohrei somehow, then it doesn't get much better than Burroughs as the #6 making a million for a couple more yearsWouldn’t mind Tinordi as a depth defenseman if they are looking at Chicago. Reese Johnson hits and does a solid job on faceoffs.
Kunin, Burroughs, and Givani Smith are guys I have interest in from SJ
Not expecting some sort of blockbuster, just bottom pairing and 4th line tweaks
I'll keep saying it. This teams weakness isn't defense, or goalie. It's goalscoring.
We better be smart about this kid, I doubt we just give him away.This. If we move on from Debrusk like seemingly everyone wants this team would have one guy under the age of 35 who is a good bet for 20+ goals on the team. Zacha has done it once, zero playoff goals, Freddy may do it this year, zero playoff goals. But let’s move on from one of the few guys who consistently show up in the playoffs and has scored 25 or more 3 times.
The guy with 4 goals in 7 playoff games last year who’s sitting at #5 in playoff goals for LWs since he broke into the league is only getting a late second. Interesting.
That's pretty damn good, no?
Many people here think, why give up assets when you can get Hanifin for "free" in the summer.
The way I see it is that Hanifin is not a rental player for the team that acquires him, but that Hanifin will almost certainly sign for the team that acquires him.
Is home Edmonton or Calgary for him? I’d grant his wish if it makes sense for us. There’s players of interest on both teams, but the dreaded salary cap is as big a factor as needs, unfortunately.He's our Noah Hanifin...
Maybe the feeling is that he also wants to "go home."
So besides the inconsistencies, teams don't want to spend
much on a guy who's as good as gone after the playoffs.
Definitely a possibility, but not set on stone at all: I'm against trading more assets/picks. It's time to improve our farm system.
No we have to keep prospects so we might win a Cup another time. I am not a huge Hanafin fan but he makes them much better today than a first round pick or Lohrei, who one day might be as good as Hanafin. Add Middleton or Lauzon to the D and I would be pretty confident about D and goaltending on the playoffs.What if they win the cup with a top 4 of:
McAvoy, Lindholm, Carlo, Hanifin?
Kunin would look nice hereYessss I was first on here saying Sturm. They have other fits too.
$ in $out....how do we trade for Hanafin with something Calgary would want that balance $ ?No we have to keep prospects so we might win a Cup another time. I am not a huge Hanafin fan but he makes them much better today than a first round pick or Lohrei, who one day might be as good as Hanafin. Add Middleton or Lauzon to the D and I would be pretty confident about D and goaltending on the playoffs.
The goal of the GM should always be to improve the team to try and win a cup
There is no team that looks unbeatable this year. All contenders are flawed so Sweeney should be doing everything he can to win a Cup
Many people here think, why give up assets when you can get Hanifin for "free" in the summer.
The way I see it is that Hanifin is not a rental player for the team that acquires him, but that Hanifin will almost certainly sign for the team that acquires him.
I feel the opposite, I think injuries complicate what was otherwise going to be a trade happening sooner rather than later. If they were going to say try and dump both forbort and gryz as part of a trade, well now you need them on the roster because lindholm is hurt.hoping the injuries don't force their hand with hanifin. i think chances are high he signs here in the offseason but at the same time nothing is set in stone until the contract is signed.
I feel the opposite, I think injuries complicate what was otherwise going to be a trade happening sooner rather than later. If they were going to say try and dump both forbort and gryz as part of a trade, well now you need them on the roster because lindholm is hurt.
$ in $out....how do we trade for Hanafin with something Calgary would want that balance $ ?
Picks, prospects, young players is not going to do it
well sure, and if I want a coy pond in my backyard all I need to do is dig a hole and fill it with waterMy preference would be to keep the young blueliner, who would be accretive to our current D corps + Hanifin, than to subtract from the current/future D corps to add Hanifin. Just an opinion.