Boston Bruins 2023-24 Roster and Salary Cap Discussion V

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
What if we signed UFA's and didn't spend any trade capital.....

Marchand - Zacha - Pasta
Debrusk - J Toews - P kane
JVR - Coyle - Frederic
Heinen - Pawtwas - Geekie

More goal scorers and better faceoffs

Anddddddddddd NVM he is now a red wing
 
I’d absolutely commit to Debrusk for 7x$6M. No question at all.
Playing on a line without #37 and #63, DeBrusk is on pace for 32 pts over an 82 game season.

You think that output is deserving or worth 7x$6M? No thanks.

I personally think his best value would be what he could fetch at TDL as pending UFA — possibly a 1st from a desperate team - to help restock bare cupboard in a big way.
 
Playing on a line without #37 and #63, DeBrusk is on pace for 32 pts over an 82 game season.

You think that output is deserving or worth 7x$6M? No thanks.

I personally think his best value would be what he could fetch at TDL as pending UFA — possibly a 1st from a desperate team - to help restock bare cupboard in a big way.

Barring a collapse that was as epic as this teams start was, they are not trading players for picks at the deadline. they'd have to be out of the playoff picture for that to happen.

And a week ago DeBrusk was on a pace for about 15 points. Two weeks from now he could easily be back on a pace for 50 points again. We are talking about a guy who scored 25 or more goals the last 2 years, and is now an very good 200 foot player, and excellent PK. guys like that are kind of rare in todays NHL, and they get paid. Even if he finishes this year with 15 goals, someone is gonna pay him because of the overall quality of his game and his proven scoring ability
 
  • Like
Reactions: wintersej
I feel like a Debrusk trade is coming… I have nothing to base it on but this team needs a shakeup.
Not pushing for it, but have the same gut feeling, you might add Frederics name to that also.

What if we signed UFA's and didn't spend any trade capital.....

Marchand - Zacha - Pasta
Debrusk - J Toews - P kane
JVR - Coyle - Frederic
Heinen - Pawtwas - Geekie

More goal scorers and better faceoffs
Toews is cooked, JVR is nothing Kane and Marchand could play on the same line and call it the "Hip Line " and maybe they can go on LTIR.
 
While I think the lack of toughness thing is real and needs to be addressed, I still think this is a really good team...I think both can be true...they are going through a slump, it's happens, thankfully they have banked so many points
 
  • Like
Reactions: The don godfather
Playing on a line without #37 and #63, DeBrusk is on pace for 32 pts over an 82 game season.

You think that output is deserving or worth 7x$6M? No thanks.

I personally think his best value would be what he could fetch at TDL as pending UFA — possibly a 1st from a desperate team - to help restock bare cupboard in a big way.

So he's not worth the money, a 32 point player without Marchand & Bergeron, but he might bring a first round pick?
 
Bruins could use Hertl and Zadarov right about now. How about...

Zacha Hertl Pasta
Marchand Coyle Zetterlund
Frederic Poitras Farinacci
Steen Beecher Lauko
Heinen

Lohrei McAvoy
Lindholm Carlo
Zadarov Mitchell

Ullmark
Bussi

Trade
To Flames: Debrusk
To Bruins: Zadarov and 2nd

To Sharks: Grz, Geekie, Swayman, Lysell, 1st
To Bruins: Hertl, Zetterlund, 2nd

* waive JVR

Trading Swayman would be a tough pill to swallow. But Bruins do have luxury at net and need a 1C real badly. Hertl is also locked up for the forseeable future.
 
Bruins could use Hertl and Zadarov right about now. How about...

Zacha Hertl Pasta
Marchand Coyle Zetterlund
Frederic Poitras Farinacci
Steen Beecher Lauko
Heinen

Lohrei McAvoy
Lindholm Carlo
Zadarov Mitchell

Ullmark
Bussi

Trade
To Flames: Debrusk
To Bruins: Zadarov and 2nd

To Sharks: Grz, Geekie, Swayman, Lysell, 1st
To Bruins: Hertl, Zetterlund, 2nd

* waive JVR

Trading Swayman would be a tough pill to swallow. But Bruins do have luxury at net and need a 1C real badly. Hertl is also locked up for the forseeable future.

Where are you getting that first round pick to send to the Sharks?
 
I don't think Sweeney is gonna make any reactionary moves based on a 3 game skid. There is no incoming Debrusk trade or Frederic trade cause this team "needs a shake up". End of the day we're still tied for first in the league with a game in hand, with a good opportunity to right the ship at home against the worst team in the league on Thursday. The guys we have need to figure it out.

I do think the current lineup needs to be tweaked though. The bottom 6 in solid IMO, Beecher has been very consistent no matter who his wingers are and adding Geekie to that line seems to has seemed to add another offensive element to it. The Coyle line has been great for the most part, Coyle is tied for 2nd on the team in points despite having the most d zone starts of any forward, JVR has been a stable vet presence, and Freddy is on pace for like 20 goals rn. That line shouldn't be touched.

The top 6 is a different story though. The first line has been an issue. Idk what's up with Marchand but plays are just constantly dying on his stick, it feels like he's always trying to do too much. Need to separate him from Pasta while he figures his shit out, cause we just don't have enough firepower to have Pasta get weighed down like this. Maybe move Debrusk up for bit and try and get him going, put Marchand back with Poitras and let him work out his issues while getting some easier matchups.

Moving on from the offense, cause the defense has been even worse IMO. The only pair I'm confident in is Lindholm-Carlo. Gryz-McAvoy has not been as effective as it has been in years past, mostly cause Gryz isn't as effective this season as he has been in past regular seasons. And I think it's already clear that Forbort-Shattenkirk is not good enough to be the third pair come playoffs. Assuming we do end up adding at the deadline, defense might be the place I want them to spend big on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarchysNoseKnows
Multiple sources have opening day roster at 28.0 last year and 28.2 this year I posted the links already and can again.

What is your source?

If someone can provide a couple sources that say otherwise I’m more than willing to just be like oh I got it off LeftWingHockey and whatever other site o posted I guess that those sites are trash.

But so far it’s been a bunch of people doing math on their own and saying I am wrong
i sort of implied it in the post, but I went to hockey-reference, exported rosters from last year and this year to CSV, put them in google sheets, trimmed them down to their actual 20-man lineups using old GDTs and ran an average function on the age column. Much more relevant than whatever LWL is doing which probably includes extra players that are not really pertinent to this discussion. It's honestly more effort than you deserve, but you make these types of claims with such smugness that it's hard to resist correcting you.

You're welcome to do the same if you really wanted to check my work, but I cannot stress enough that you are overthinking this and it should be obvious under even the most basic scrutiny that they didn't get older.

They lost their 3 oldest players in Bergeron, Krejci & Foligno. The 3 veterans they signed to be regulars (JVR, Shattenkirk and Lucic) are younger than all 3 of them so they got younger even on the top end. When you consider the rest of the lineup is filled out with new guys like Poitras (19!), Beecher, Lauko, Geekie, Mitchell/Lohrei it should be plainly obvious that any source claiming their average age went up should be questioned.

But honestly, this is what's frustrating about debating anything with you. You start with a premise (in this case: "Sweeney lied about wanting to get younger") and then look for something, anything to prove your point (in this case a number you pulled from 1 website with minimal scrutiny) and then you cling to that one data point like it's gospel instead of just considering for a moment that your premise might be flawed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad