Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

tahoesharksfan

Old-Timer
Apr 29, 2014
2,421
1,719
The Lake
I think you know in your heart of hearts that the third line is going to feature the dream duo of Luke Kunin and Barclay Goodrow.

This is 100% true. And the fourth line will be a rotating cast of career 12-pointers. But hey! Top two lines will be fun. Smith is probably going to struggle for a while but I’m looking forward to the development.

The truth in these two posts just make me sad…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Star Platinum

hotcabbagesoup

"I'm going to get what I deserve" -RutgerMcgroarty
Feb 18, 2009
10,801
14,920
Reno, Nevada
The truth in these two posts just make me sad…

Doesn't make me sad.

It tells me that these two know their stuff. If either of them decide to go past the beat writer type blogging and become real sports personalities, I would 100% support them. Jux could be the next Wojznarovski but for hockey. Her tweets would be JuxBombs!

(I considered KoyoteBombs but that sounds a little too feral like something you step in at Henry Coe)
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
770
1,118
I think you know in your heart of hearts that the third line is going to feature the dream duo of Luke Kunin and Barclay Goodrow.

uhh-no-butt-head.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

hockfan1991

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
2,095
325
Agreed. Dupont is literally exactly the player we need. I really wish he were eligible sooner than three years away. If we're still this bad in three years, I think most of the fans around here now won't still be. ;)
If we are still bad/terrible in 3 years picking in the top 5. It means we busted on a lot of our forwards.

My projection would be mid to late teens at that point in time.
 

hockfan1991

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
2,095
325

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,471
15,155
Folsom
If we are still bad/terrible in 3 years picking in the top 5. It means we busted on a lot of our forwards.

My projection would be mid to late teens at that point in time.
I disagree with this. If we're still bad/terrible in 3 years picking in the top 5, it means we've never successfully addressed the blue line. This team's weakest point since Grier took over is the blue line and typically the guys that take the longest to develop are blue liners. Dickinson may only be finishing his first pro year in three years. We may or may not know what we're getting out of guys like Muk or Cagnoni by then. It's hard to say. Our blue line doesn't have much committed to it and doesn't have a whole lot invested into it from a prospects perspective for such a group that is lacking talent. That group is pivotal for being able to claw one's way out of the bottom.
 

hockfan1991

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
2,095
325
I disagree with this. If we're still bad/terrible in 3 years picking in the top 5, it means we've never successfully addressed the blue line. This team's weakest point since Grier took over is the blue line and typically the guys that take the longest to develop are blue liners. Dickinson may only be finishing his first pro year in three years. We may or may not know what we're getting out of guys like Muk or Cagnoni by then. It's hard to say. Our blue line doesn't have much committed to it and doesn't have a whole lot invested into it from a prospects perspective for such a group that is lacking talent. That group is pivotal for being able to claw one's way out of the bottom.
You believe with our current projections of forwards, if they pan out. in 3 years if they are meeting projections. legit top 6/allstar/ franchise center etc. That we would still be bad enough to pick top 5. Without a top 5 pick in 3 years, i would say top 5 finish this season for sure. Potentially breaking out of the top ten year 2. By after year 3 it would seem we are taking steps back if we continue to pick top 5, as i would have us likely still improving. My point is i think they have an outside shot to compete, be in playoff race late year 3.

I would also think by next summer, and the one after the will be agressive in free agency/trades. I can see them putting a decently competitive roster before all the elcs are up for a year at least. You can add a couple quality D by free agency trade in an offseason.

Boyle Trade/ Blake sign. There will be opportunities, gotta hope this core comes together.
 
Last edited:

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,471
15,155
Folsom
You believe with our current projections of forwards, if they pan out. in 3 years if they are meeting projections. legit top 6/allstar/ franchise center etc. That we would still be bad enough to pick top 5. Without a top 5 pick in 3 years, i would say top 5 finish this season for sure. Potentially breaking out of the top ten year 2. By after year 3 it would seem we are taking steps back if we continue to pick top 5, as i would have us likely still improving. My point is i think they have an outside shot to compete, be in playoff race late year 3.

I would also think by next summer, and the one after the will be agressive in free agency/trades. I can see them putting a decently competitive roster before all the elcs are up for a year at least. You can add a couple quality D by free agency trade in an offseason.

Boyle Trade/ Blake sign. There will be opportunities, gotta hope this core comes together.
It's very possible. If our blue line continues to be a hodgepodge of bottom pairing defensemen or worse as a group, it can very much drag down the play and productivity of the forwards who may still meet certain projections like that. I agree there will be opportunities to improve the blue line externally but I wouldn't get my hopes up over it. The supply is almost always thin and the Sharks are rarely the ones that benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

DG93

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
4,770
2,944
San Jose
Totally off topic...anyone else having the problem where you get locked out once you go to the main Sharks forum page (but when you open up the individual threads, you're logged in)? Very odd...
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,480
1,893
I suspect this will be a controversial opinion but I think we should trade Zetterlund instead of re-signing him. I think Zetterlund's value will never be higher than it is right now and that we could likely get a first and a bit more for him in a trade.
It would have to be for similar value as what was given up for Askarov.

I would be more inclined to if Smith and Celebrini struggle since that would delay the timeline.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,680
7,934
I suspect this will be a controversial opinion but I think we should trade Zetterlund instead of re-signing him. I think Zetterlund's value will never be higher than it is right now and that we could likely get a first and a bit more for him in a trade.
Why would we trade a 25 year old middle six forward for a pick that has maybe a 15% chance of developing into a similar player in 4-5 years?
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,471
15,155
Folsom
I suspect this will be a controversial opinion but I think we should trade Zetterlund instead of re-signing him. I think Zetterlund's value will never be higher than it is right now and that we could likely get a first and a bit more for him in a trade.
I'm only open to moving Zetterlund if it returns a cornerstone defenseman type. Outside of that, Zetterlund should be kept until we create a situation where we have too many wingers and not enough spots. We're probably two years away from that at the earliest.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,895
23,265
Bay Area
I suspect this will be a controversial opinion but I think we should trade Zetterlund instead of re-signing him. I think Zetterlund's value will never be higher than it is right now and that we could likely get a first and a bit more for him in a trade.
You're probably right that his value is higher now than it'll ever be, but aren't we done with the tear down? Why are we moving valuable players out? Who exactly in our system is going to replace Zetterlund? We have no prospects like him, so we'd just be looking for another Zetterlund immediately.
 

Alaskanice

Registered User
Sep 23, 2009
7,095
7,946
1 1/2 hours away
You're probably right that his value is higher now than it'll ever be, but aren't we done with the tear down? Why are we moving valuable players out? Who exactly in our system is going to replace Zetterlund? We have no prospects like him, so we'd just be looking for another Zetterlund immediately.
Thanks for making this point. I think some get “trade happy.” Zetterlund is certainly a part of the core, in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad