Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Glad to see both Eklund and Bordeleau forced the issue and made their way onto the team

Watching how they develop will be the highlight of the season, hopefully they make the most of this opportunity
Not sure about that yet, if all the veterans were healthy at the moment i would fully believe they forced the way onto the team, but there are some guaranteed players not ready for opening night.

Once Couture comes back we will have 14 forwards, 15 if Mitchell stays.
 
Why?
MG has done a great job with a bad situation. He’s turning it quickly. I really don’t know what calls for him to be fired.
If you want him gone, who would you rather?
I don’t get this thinking.
It's what i was saying for a few years now, the majority of the shark fans are to impatient for an actual full rebuild, some fans are not seeing immediate results from the change in leadership and they are being vocal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: General Manager
Not sure about that yet, if all the veterans were healthy at the moment i would fully believe they forced the way onto the team, but there are some guaranteed players not ready for opening night.

Once Couture comes back we will have 14 forwards, 15 if Mitchell stays.
I think I'm missing something, who is Mitchell?

I don't think Couture was the difference between Bordeleau making it or not, he would still be slotting in over Zetterlund and Smith at this point, it seems like they both legitimately grabbed these spots, which is what I was hoping to see from some young guys

Thrun seems to have done so as well, it appears the only young guy that's intentionally being held back is Mukhamadullin, but I don't mind seeing a young promising D being protected from playing on this bad of a team, hopefully he proves too good for the AHL and makes his way up mid-season
 
I think I'm missing something, who is Mitchell?

I don't think Couture was the difference between Bordeleau making it or not, he would still be slotting in over Zetterlund and Smith at this point, it seems like they both legitimately grabbed these spots, which is what I was hoping to see from some young guys

Thrun seems to have done so as well, it appears the only young guy that's intentionally being held back is Mukhamadullin, but I don't mind seeing a young promising D being protected from playing on this bad of a team, hopefully he proves too good for the AHL and makes his way up mid-season
Again with just couture coming back, it means we will be sitting 2-3 forwards per night. Without Couture only 1 or 2 might be, so they are good now but we will find out just how much they forced the hands once Couture comes back.
 
I don't think Couture was the difference between Bordeleau making it or not, he would still be slotting in over Zetterlund and Smith at this point, it seems like they both legitimately grabbed these spots, which is what I was hoping to see from some young guys
There's no way we would have waived Zetterlund or Smith just to make room for Bordeleau. He clearly only made the team because Couture is injured but it's still a good sign that he beat out the likes of Carpenter.
 
Again with just couture coming back, it means we will be sitting 2-3 forwards per night. Without Couture only 1 or 2 might be, so they are good now but we will find out just how much they forced the hands once Couture comes back.
There's no way we would have waived Zetterlund or Smith just to make room for Bordeleau. He clearly only made the team because Couture is injured but it's still a good sign that he beat out the likes of Carpenter.
I suppose so, I didn't factor in the 23 man limit

Though, I wouldn't be shocked if we waived Zetterlund, he provides no tangible value and Mike already waived 3 guys he signed and traded for within the last 15 months this offseason, I don't think he had a guaranteed roster spot if everyone was healthy
 
I suppose so, I didn't factor in the 23 man limit

Though, I wouldn't be shocked if we waived Zetterlund, he provides no tangible value and Mike already waived 3 guys he signed and traded for within the last 15 months this offseason, I don't think he had a guaranteed roster spot if everyone was healthy

I know he has had a rough Sharks audition but he was actually a good player for the Devils. Their fans weren't just blowing smoke up our asses.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
I suppose so, I didn't factor in the 23 man limit

Though, I wouldn't be shocked if we waived Zetterlund, he provides no tangible value and Mike already waived 3 guys he signed and traded for within the last 15 months this offseason, I don't think he had a guaranteed roster spot if everyone was healthy
Bordeleau might be better than Zetterlund and Smith but he is not competing with those two for a roster spot.

He has shown he can’t play wing successfully so he has to compete with Hertl, Couture, Granlund, Sturm, and Carpenter. He beat out Carpenter but he is not better than any of the other 4 so with those 4 C’s healthy he should be sent down as opposed to being a scratch every night.
 
Bordeleau might be better than Zetterlund and Smith but he is not competing with those two for a roster spot.

He has shown he can’t play wing successfully so he has to compete with Hertl, Couture, Granlund, Sturm, and Carpenter. He beat out Carpenter but he is not better than any of the other 4 so with those 4 C’s healthy he should be sent down as opposed to being a scratch every night.
I don't think the plan is for Granlund to play center long term, he hasn't been a real NHL C since his time in Minnesota

In my kind Granlund is actually the emergency C while Couture is out, not Bordeleau, but we'll have to see if Quinn is thinking along those lines once Logan is healthy

I know he has had a rough Sharks audition but he was actually a good player for the Devils. Their fans weren't just blowing smoke up our asses.
God I hope so, I haven't seen a single shift from him as a Shark that inspired any amount of confidence, he accomplishes nothing on the ice so I hope he begins to turn it around
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
I don't think the plan is for Granlund to play center long term, he hasn't been a real NHL C since his time in Minnesota

In my kind Granlund is actually the emergency C while Couture is out, not Bordeleau, but we'll have to see if Quinn is thinking along those lines once Logan is healthy


God I hope so, I haven't seen a single shift from him as a Shark that inspired any amount of confidence, he accomplishes nothing on the ice so I hope he begins to turn it around
Thank god our GM doesn’t define an entire tenure on the merit of 23 or so games.
 
I don't think the plan is for Granlund to play center long term, he hasn't been a real NHL C since his time in Minnesota

In my kind Granlund is actually the emergency C while Couture is out, not Bordeleau, but we'll have to see if Quinn is thinking along those lines once Logan is healthy


God I hope so, I haven't seen a single shift from him as a Shark that inspired any amount of confidence, he accomplishes nothing on the ice so I hope he begins to turn it around
Yes Granlund could be moved to wing. That would then potentially squeeze Eklund then as I don’t see Zetterlund getting waived since he was a specific target in that trade. Smith also serves a purpose that Eklund does not. Labanc could be waived but that is a lot of money to bury. I think no matter where Granlund plays one of Eklund or Bordeleau gets sent down when Couture comes back.

I also think they have identified that Granlund is better at C and that could have contributed to him not having as good of an impact with Pittsburgh.
 
Once Couture comes back we will have 14 forwards, 15 if Mitchell stays.

Do you mean Mitchell Russell? That guy's in no way a candidate for the Sharks, the only action he saw last season was in the ECHL. He's just still up due to whatever it is that's wrong with him.

I would love to know what exactly is going on there, but I don't think anyone is going to ask. Russell played two ECHL games in 22-23, then sat out the rest of the year with injury. Was a scratch for the prospect scrimmage, did play a game in the prospect tournament in Vegas, and now I guess is hurt again. Have no idea what the issue is, but it's been a long time now.
 
Do you mean Mitchell Russell? That guy's in no way a candidate for the Sharks, the only action he saw last season was in the ECHL. He's just still up due to whatever it is that's wrong with him.

I would love to know what exactly is going on there, but I don't think anyone is going to ask. Russell played two ECHL games in 22-23, then sat out the rest of the year with injury. Was a scratch for the prospect scrimmage, did play a game in the prospect tournament in Vegas, and now I guess is hurt again. Have no idea what the issue is, but it's been a long time now.
If Mitchell Russell plays for the Sharks this year, we have either hit the jackpot or we are being contracted as a mercy.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Why?
MG has done a great job with a bad situation. He’s turning it quickly. I really don’t know what calls for him to be fired.
If you want him gone, who would you rather?
I don’t get this thinking.

Lineup is poor. Why is Peterson not here, one of the guys who actually consistently created offense for us last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.