mr figgles
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2012
- 1,437
- 3,291
If you pay for the site are there no adds at all?
And do others have constant refreshing?
Use an ad blocker. The site is unusable without one.
If you pay for the site are there no adds at all?
And do others have constant refreshing?
Yep. Barzal around a 20/50 guy.Bro Barzal is a PPG player
Please remember what you saw was against a bunch of mediocre prospects.
I’m a Niagara ice dogs fan, Jett was very good in the games I saw vs Guelph. Also saw that U18 tourny, he was solid then too.I watched 5 OHL games post-draft, including 2 playoff games, and none of these superstar dynamic qualities showed up in a single one. But they did in a July intra-prospect scrimmage against a lot of bad prospects. It makes you think.
I don’t see high end, I see Kesler level.
Tbh I think you are giving Ryan Kesler's offense a little more credit than it probably deserves. He exploded one time with 40, but never hit 30 besides that. Super big anomaly. Two years with 70 plus points but never a point per game I'm probably underrating Kesler's defense. He was damn impressive. Loved him on the 2010 Olympics team.The Ryan Kesler who peaked as a top 5 goal scoring, top 15 point getting, Selke winning center pre-injuries?
If we're saying that's a more realistic upside, that's high-end. I remain skeptical about Luchanko's skill level. I had Robert Thomas ranked 10th in his class for perspective. As I've said, he's a good player that should be of real use. But the skating (his top end does pop) really didn't play as much as I hoped on-puck. He wasn't much of a transition weapon; it showed itself more in checking/recovery. He had some trouble handling pucks at top speed, and he lost it quite a lot (often self-bobbling) through sticks and traffic, where high end guys operate.
He does seem to focus a lot on defense which obviously can be very good. The exciting thing there is he can create turnovers and spring the breaking guy back the other way. I see a lot of potential there with Michkov or similar type player if we get more. Likely if he did great things on offense at his high speed he would be pretty highly rated. Flahr commented that he wants him to be less defensive this year to try and focus on putting up more points. I’m sure they see this as a must for optics alone.The Ryan Kesler who peaked as a top 5 goal scoring, top 15 point getting, Selke winning center pre-injuries?
If we're saying that's a more realistic upside, that's high-end. I remain skeptical about Luchanko's skill level. I had Robert Thomas ranked 10th in his class for perspective. As I've said, he's a good player that should be of real use. But the skating (his top end does pop) really didn't play as much as I hoped on-puck. He wasn't much of a transition weapon; it showed itself more in checking/recovery. He had some trouble handling pucks at top speed, and he lost it quite a lot (often self-bobbling) through sticks and traffic, where high end guys operate.
Tbh I think you are giving Ryan Kesler's offense a little more credit than it probably deserves. He exploded one time with 40, but never hit 30 besides that. Super big anomaly. Two years with 70 plus points but never a point per game I'm probably underrating Kesler's defense. He was damn impressive. Loved him on the 2010 Olympics team.
I could really see Jett as a 25 goal scorer, 60/70 point guy, with a plus 200 foot game. Maybe a little better on the offensive side than Ryan, but worse in the dzone.
And how about the rest of his career?View attachment 893500
Ryan Kessler from 2009-2011, ranked in the 93 percentile for offensive over that time. Much more effective offensive player than defensive player. Wonderful pp guy, terrible pk guy.
And how about the rest of his career?
regardless, besides the 40 goals, all of this is obtainable
We shall see my friend. I have high hopes on this kid.View attachment 893505
View attachment 893506
He’s the same basic player through the best part of his career. He was mostly impactful thru offense.
When it comes to the larger part of the discussion re Luchanko’s projections, sure, I can see a possibility of him hitting 25/35/60 (personally I think if he hits 60p it’s going to be driven mostly by assists), but the chances of all of that coming are extremely low. I think if projecting him to a 60-70 point forward with plus defense were reasonable, at this stage, he would have went top 5-7.
I agree that he's a player to watch, not a dud. He's not even particularly a bad pick at spot 13 in most drafts. I think the lack of elite puck skills will be his limiting factor in how good he is.We shall see my friend. I have high hopes on this kid.
When I made my comparison, I really didn't have the high end 2011 Ryan Kesler in mind. More or less the consistent 20G 35A type version. (I'd be thrilled if this was the case)
Passing on a stud, PPG freshmen defenseman because we already have Emil Andrae in the minors.
Imagine Briere passing on Michkov last year because we already have Brink at RW.
The Ryan Kesler who peaked as a top 5 goal scoring, top 15 point getting, Selke winning center pre-injuries?
If we're saying that's a more realistic upside, that's high-end. I remain skeptical about Luchanko's skill level. I had Robert Thomas ranked 10th in his class for perspective. As I've said, he's a good player that should be of real use. But the skating (his top end does pop) really didn't play as much as I hoped on-puck. He wasn't much of a transition weapon; it showed itself more in checking/recovery. He had some trouble handling pucks at top speed, and he lost it quite a lot (often self-bobbling) through sticks and traffic, where high end guys operate.
It’s kind of important to note too that Kesler played a good chunk of his mid 20’s to early 30’s in some of the lowest scoring seasons in the modern era.
There’s also a huge, huge difference between a player who is reliably and consistently a 70 point player and a guy who peaks as 70 point player.Do you guys have any idea how much raw skill you need to process to be a 70 point guy barring any unforeseen changes in league scoring spikes? The kid was just a 70 point scorer in the OHL.
Hell a 70 point average would be one of the better outcomes for Michkov.
I was going to point this out too. 60 pts isn't quite what it was then.
Do you guys have any idea how much raw skill you need to process to be a 70 point guy barring any unforeseen changes in league scoring spikes?
Hell a 70 point average would be one of the better outcomes for Michkov.
Last year 92 players scored 60 points, 52 scored 70 pointsDo you guys have any idea how much raw skill you need to process to be a 70 point guy barring any unforeseen changes in league scoring spikes? The kid was just a 70 point scorer in the OHL.
Hell a 70 point average would be one of the better outcomes for Michkov.