quesosauce
Registered User
unless the player gets hurtsecond the value is actually higher at the deadline than it is in the summer.
unless the player gets hurtsecond the value is actually higher at the deadline than it is in the summer.
In reality, that issue doesn't come up all that often. It happens from time to time, but the odds are against it cratering value.unless the player gets hurt
It would not be wasted work even if picks get traded. The scouting helps in deciding whether they want to keep or trade picks.I doubt the Avs trade the 1st for this year. The closest to trading a near future first was Kuemper that was a whole season away. They haven't made a summer trade of a current year 1st since they moved down in the 2005 draft.
Saying this, the Avs have changed tendencies in the past and they could again this year. But they'd be essentially throwing away the work of the scouts for a 2nd straight season if they did so.
Sure to an extent… and to an extent the reports help in trades down the line.It would not be wasted work even if picks get traded. The scouting helps in deciding whether they want to keep or trade picks.
I doubt the Avs trade the 1st for this year. The closest to trading a near future first was Kuemper that was a whole season away. They haven't made a summer trade of a current year 1st since they moved down in the 2005 draft.
Saying this, the Avs have changed tendencies in the past and they could again this year. But they'd be essentially throwing away the work of the scouts for a 2nd straight season if they did so.
But...on the flip side, the scouts had all the opportunities in the world until the last few seasons. And what did they do with them? Jack-shit, would be the only correct answer.Sure to an extent… and to an extent the reports help in trades down the line.
Here’s the rub though… scouts work hard and like anybody they want to feel they are contributing to the organization. If they don’t feel that way, the good ones will eventually move on for better opportunities. Right now they are basically working to get a chance at 2 or 3 guys hovering around 75-90 on the internal list. Guys they don’t feel have much of a chance of contributing.
Depends how you view it… they landed some good trade chips. There has also been some signs of improvement, only signs and we have no idea how it will play out in the end.But...on the flip side, the scouts had all the opportunities in the world until the last few seasons. And what did they do with them? Jack-shit, would be the only correct answer.
I legit snorted out loud at that. Congrats.Depends how you view it… they landed some good trade chips. There has also been some signs of improvement, only signs and we have no idea how it will play out in the end.
Who had me coming to defend scouts on their 2023 bingo card?
Calgary will go the route that if they don't re-sign their UFAs that they do a firesale towards the deadline. You might have guys like Z and Toffoli moved this summer to clear some of the complexity, but Backlund, Hanifin, and Lindholm won't move in the summer even if they don't sign. First for the reason that they want to keep those guys even in a re-tool... second the value is actually higher at the deadline than it is in the summer.
Why would Calgary have any interest in Newhook? They have several wingers better than him.My sense is the Avs are going to try to extend Toews ~ the $7M mark, and sign Byram to a 3 year bridge around 4M. Then trade Girad & Newhook in a package for a 2C (Lindholm please). I actually see Calgary having interest in Newhook.
That leaves us with our top 3 D getting paid ~20M for 2 seasons which ain't bad at all for players of their caliber. Toews is likely dealt when Bo needs a new deal, or we see if trading Bo becomes an option then.
Why would Calgary have any interest in Newhook? They have several wingers better than him.
He can't be lazy if he play with Mack and Lekhonen. At 50% for a B prospect or better option likeAdding Mantha doesn’t make the team tougher. It certainly makes us lazier though.
Yup this is a legit possibility. It be fine with it too. In fact, I’d be fine using Landeskog’s LTIR to just overload on forward depth. If we could somehow get all 3 of JTC, Monahan and Drouin for 7ish M combined that would be fantastic even though there’s a lot of question marks there.Remember how LeBrun kept linking the Avs to Monahan last year? LeBrun is the only insider that has access to Sakic/Macfarland.
If he's healthy to play and sign somewhere I bet he's going to be an Av on a bargain deal. Can't be count on to be our 2C of course but would add center depth.
Yup this is a legit possibility. It be fine with it too. In fact, I’d be fine using Landeskog’s LTIR to just overload on forward depth. If we could somehow get all 3 of JTC, Monahan and Drouin for 7ish M combined that would be fantastic even though there’s a lot of question marks there.
IMO JTC is going to turn into a pumpkin sooner rather than later. Give him a 8 year contract and in year 2 he turns into a pumpkin... you're kinda F'd.I’d offer JTC 8 years, 3.85M AAV to see if he bites. That’s around 30M total. For some perspective, a 5 year, 5.5M AAV deal is 27.5M total which is what we expect he’ll get on the open market.
He’s not a 2C. That’s been proven. But this team is thin down the middle and getting him on great value at the expense of a few extra years is something I’d be all over. You need depth. I just don’t think he would take that type of deal without dipping his toe into the market first.
Monahan would get hurt, JTC would be our 2C to start the playoffs again next year and we'd end up just like this year. No thanks to any scenario involving JTC coming back.Yup this is a legit possibility. It be fine with it too. In fact, I’d be fine using Landeskog’s LTIR to just overload on forward depth. If we could somehow get all 3 of JTC, Monahan and Drouin for 7ish M combined that would be fantastic even though there’s a lot of question marks there.
Don't understand the last part. The issue in what you've just presented is Monahan, not Compher.Monahan would get hurt, JTC would be our 2C to start the playoffs again next year and we'd end up just like this year. No thanks to any scenario with JTC coming back.
No it's Compher.Don't understand the last part. The issue in what you've just presented is Monahan, not Compher.
Your scenario has Monahan as the 2C, then getting hurt. That seems like a Monahan problem, not a Compher problem.No it's Compher.
Monahan on a 1M deal doesnt hurt the team, he's a lottery ticket. He'd basically replace Helm but with a higher ceiling.
If JTC comes back they'll count on him. Totally different.
That was Cousin Eddie's scenario.Your scenario has Monahan as the 2C, then getting hurt. That seems like a Monahan problem, not a Compher problem.
Sure it's his scenario, but you've taken it and twisted it. Your 2nd scenario doesn't make sense either. Sure, it's got PLD there but then Monahan getting hurt results in what, Ben Meyers playing 3C?That was Cousin Eddie's scenario.
JTC + Monahan doesn't work. PLD + Monahan works. Hope it's clearer!