Rumor: 2023-2024 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: Off-season is in full swing

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

AvsCOL

Registered User
Jul 16, 2013
4,902
5,277


There's our 3RW hopefully by season's end.

"Forward Nikolay Kovalenko will continue to play for Torpedo on loan. The hockey player will soon sign a contract with the NHL club Colorado Avalanche, but will spend the upcoming season in the KHL."
 

GoNordiquesGo

Registered User
Oct 1, 2016
734
696
Montreal, Quebec
Weird how I’ve gotten a similar question twice today. Nothing has changed really. I’m not down on him, there are just reasonable questions. I still think RyJo has high level play in him. He’s older and is coming off another injury. So some regression is warranted. His effort is still a major question. We just don’t know how he jumps back or if he does. Not sure how people can’t recognize the risk. Yet, if he answers those questions with good answers… he’s a phenomenal player as he showed two seasons ago. If he’s regressed majorly and doesn’t give a shit, he’ll flame out.
I'm pretty sure everyone recognizes the risk. The debate I'm seeing is that :
1) Some think it was a bad move because there is risk, therefore they should have done something else, i.e. unload Girard and use that cap space on a 2C. I'm not sure they realize that it would be very, very hard to keep Toews next year if you use Girard's cap space elsewhere. Or most probably they don't care about next year.
2) Others think it was a good move, despite the risk, because they like the odds, it cost nothiing and we still have G as a asset to use if things go wrong.

Its the exact same think with Drouin. There is risk therefore its a bad move. They should have acquired a bona fide top 6 forward to replace Landeskog. Usually those in that category are the same wo ar in category 1) above. How they think we could have the cap space to get both a real 2C and a real Landeskog replacement is beyond me however...

As for RyJo, I just think that going from "Top 10 when he cares" to "as you describe him now" in roughly a year's time doesn't fit the "nothing has changed really". But that's OK, people can change their mind, nothing wrong with that. Its not like he was amazing in the last few years. Actually I fully agree with your current assessment. Its the previous one that I always thought was over the board.
 

chet1926

Registered User
Jan 9, 2008
12,798
6,264
Denver
Hate to break it to you but Dunn isn't really a comp for Toews. Dunn had a career year last year but is probably closer to his 35 pts self. He is closer to Girard than Toews.

There is a reason Toews is always projected on team Canada rosters and Dunn is never.

Toews is going to get paid, GMs around the league value him highly. The only factor for Toews is age, how will that play in.
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
25,977
9,971
Michigan


There's our 3RW hopefully by season's end.

"Forward Nikolay Kovalenko will continue to play for Torpedo on loan. The hockey player will soon sign a contract with the NHL club Colorado Avalanche, but will spend the upcoming season in the KHL."


If Hench is right about him skating with his head down he may have a similar development path to Byram.

Hope not
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,887
26,045
That would be a fantastic deal for Toews, IMO.
Well yeah obviously. But maybe I'm underrating Dunn but I think Toews is better than Dunn. I mean Dunn obviously had a great year, but they're comparably offensively but I think Toews is noticeably better defensively. I guess worst case is Toews would realistically get 8 instead of Dunn so maybe I'm overreacting a little.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

GoNordiquesGo

Registered User
Oct 1, 2016
734
696
Montreal, Quebec
Its not fair to say the Avs have risk with RyJo, Drouin etc but they ARE a top team and say Dallas has risk because they have older guys and therefore are NOT a top team.

I think both teams are the top two teams in the division and will compete all year long. Health will likely be the determining factor, along with how the risk elements mentionned above will turn out. Last year Dallas staed healthy all year whereas the Avs... not so much.

Will be fun to watch.

Hench is just a realist and pointing out the possibility.

I mean, sure we could have three centers top 60 points. Who needs a 4C if they're eating that much ice though. That would be Duchy, ROR, Staz days with an actually competent D core.

I doubt Colton has the linemates or PP time consistently to break out like that unless significant injuries happen. You never know with this team though.
Yes.
I like to poke Hench once in a while because he is a realist/pessimist with the Avs, but most of the time an optimist with most other teams. He's tougher with the Avs than with other teams. I guess love does that :)
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
25,977
9,971
Michigan
Its not fair to say the Avs have risk with RyJo, Drouin etc but they ARE a top team and say Dallas has risk because they have older guys and therefore are NOT a top team.

I think both teams are the top two teams in the division and will compete all year long. Health will likely be the determining factor, along with how the risk elements mentionned above will turn out. Last year Dallas staed healthy all year whereas the Avs... not so much.

Will be fun to watch.


Yes.
I like to poke Hench once in a while because he is a realist/pessimist with the Avs, but most of the time an optimist with most other teams. He's tougher with the Avs than with other teams. I guess love does that :)

Tough love is the best love
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABasin

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,144
22,667
Its not fair to say the Avs have risk with RyJo, Drouin etc but they ARE a top team and say Dallas has risk because they have older guys and therefore are NOT a top team.
If anything, it has been the other way around here the last two days. Because of the risk with RyJo and Drouin, apparently the Avs might miss the playoffs but Stars are a lock to win it all.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,189
37,426
I’m surprised to see people not like that Dunn contract. I think it’s phenomenal for Seattle. I think he’s worth every bit of that AAV and possibly more right now and it’s not at risk of aging out since it ends when he’s 30.

Great piece of business by Seattle and great for the Avs for a Toews comp. They’re pretty similar players right now but Dunn is way younger and signed for short term. If Toews only wants 7 or 8 years hopefully this might help make that happen on a much lower AAV.

If I’m Cmac I lay two offers down for Toews right now.
4 years x 8M
8 years x 6M
 

thedoctor

                    
Aug 28, 2007
3,960
538
I’m surprised to see people not like that Dunn contract. I think it’s phenomenal for Seattle. I think he’s worth every bit of that AAV and possibly more right now and it’s not at risk of aging out since it ends when he’s 30.

Great piece of business by Seattle and great for the Avs for a Toews comp. They’re pretty similar players right now but Dunn is way younger and signed for short term. If Toews only wants 7 or 8 years hopefully this might help make that happen on a much lower AAV.

If I’m Cmac I lay two offers down for Toews right now.
4 years x 8M
8 years x 6M
Agreed 100%
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
51,280
55,278
Toews signed 4 years at 4.1M at age 26
Dunn signed 4 years at 7.35M at age 26

Both players will finish those contracts at age 30.. I don't think that the Dunn 4 year contract will have an impact on Toews' 7-8 years one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche

AvalancheSpeedsters

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
1,243
1,301
Kamloops, BC
It's been said, I think most recently by Trotz that Ryjo has changed his game a bit to someone who goes to the dirty areas more, and uses his body more.

Lots of tip ins and goals around the net. Obviously that shooting percentage isn't going to hold, but the guy can get goals in many different ways the way he's been playing.

Not worried about it tbH.. with the wingers he'll have he'll get plenty of chances going to the net or not. I do think he's better at using and adapting to his line mates than Kadri was.

Kadri is kind of a straight line center, Ryjo is more cerebral. I'm excited to see what he does as the #2 and with someone like Mack setting the tone.

You do not wear the socks of someone you do not respect. Also, Bednar knows him as well as any coach outside of Trotz.

There are so many reasons to believe we're going to enjoy watching that dude this year.
Exactly I can’t imagine him and Drouin NOT being motivated and playing hard . From a purely human and mental side , being traded here HAS to be a massive boost . Plus for them, if they do well it can mean another good contract down the line . Win win.

Any time a team that has high championship hopes says « we want you » you can’t help but perform as well as you can . Not worried about them for that reason .
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
51,280
55,278
Seravalli posted this today:



I clicked on the original Tweet to read the comments. Let's just say that they didn't age well.

Most fans don't fully understand the difference between a 25 yo and a 30 yo for a hockey player and are looking at what they have done instead of what they will do.

I find this very relevant to the Dunn vs Toews situation.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,144
22,667
Seravalli posted this today:



I clicked on the original Tweet to read the comments. Let's just say that they didn't age well.

Most fans don't fully understand the difference between a 25 yo and a 30 yo for a hockey player and are looking at what they have done instead of what they will do.

I find this very relevant to the Dunn vs Toews situation.

I think the general consensus of that trade was that it made the Flames better in the short term, Panthers better in the long term.

I would imagine Huberdeau bouncing back this year, Weegar as well. Treliving did well under the circumstances. The mistake was not getting rid of Sutter earlier, which was obviously an ownership dictated decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brett44

chet1926

Registered User
Jan 9, 2008
12,798
6,264
Denver
Seravalli posted this today:



I clicked on the original Tweet to read the comments. Let's just say that they didn't age well.

Most fans don't fully understand the difference between a 25 yo and a 30 yo for a hockey player and are looking at what they have done instead of what they will do.

I find this very relevant to the Dunn vs Toews situation.

I agree, Toews is tricky due to his age. He is easily one of the best in the league, absolutely top 20. But he will be 30. How quickly does his age start to show?

That's why I think something like 4x8.5 would be awesome gives him the chance to get another good deal at 34. Or maybe something like 8x6 if he is more interested in stability, and it helps us keep AAV down.
 

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
45,982
44,175
Caverns of Draconis
I agree, Toews is tricky due to his age. He is easily one of the best in the league, absolutely top 20. But he will be 30. How quickly does his age start to show?

That's why I think something like 4x8.5 would be awesome gives him the chance to get another good deal at 34. Or maybe something like 8x6 if he is more interested in stability, and it helps us keep AAV down.

They should give him max term to get his AAV as low as possible.

Don't need to worry about 3-4 years from now. We will be rebuilding by then.


If Toews is willing to sign either A) 4x$9M or B) 7x$7.5M the Avs should take option B, 10/10 times. That's about extra $1.5M of space to work with while we're actually contenders.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
51,280
55,278
Avs can't make a decision on Toews until they make a decision on Girard.

You can't have 3 LHD of that caliber. Just not feasible cap wise. Girard is also the worst of the bunch.

If you keep Girard (big mistake) you need to trade Toews.

OR

Keep Girard and Byram on the left side and spend that Toews money on better forwards (or Landy if he comes back).

If Byram can play first pairing minutes it solves most problems, really. We'll know more this season.
 

Gumballhead

Registered User
Nov 18, 2002
5,309
2,478
Chicago
scotchhorns.bandcamp.com
Toews is tricky because he did not look like the same defender to me last year. If he looks like that again, then I am less worried about losing him. I just can’t imagine him playing that way again. He’s absolutely crucial when he’s playing like he did the Cup year.
 

EdAVSfan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2009
7,554
4,573
Avs can't make a decision on Toews until they make a decision on Girard.

You can't have 3 LHD of that caliber. Just not feasible cap wise. Girard is also the worst of the bunch.

If you keep Girard (big mistake) you need to trade Toews.
I think its the other way around.

Girard is already signed. If they need to move him, they can.

Toews is the un-signed one.

They need to decide what theyre doing with Toews first. If they decide to sign Toews, Girard goes. IF they decide to walk away from Toews, they keep Girard.

Girard is the domino here.
 

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
45,982
44,175
Caverns of Draconis
There's another option here people are forgetting.

Keep all 3 of them, and trade Manson. Both Byram and G have played the right side a decent bit the last year, probably going to play a fair bit more again this year.

Manson is the one that is actually useless on the Defense and moving him would almost provide just as much cap relief as moving Girard would.

I actually think this is more likely then moving Toews at this point. It isn't a coincidence IMO that Mansons NTC becomes considerably less restrictive just days before the 2024 draft and the same time Toews is a UFA.
 

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
38,630
42,152
Edmonton, Alberta
OR

Keep Girard and Byram on the left side and spend that Toews money on better forwards (or Landy if he comes back).

If Byram can play first pairing minutes it solves most problems, really. We'll know more this season.
Just spend that Girard money on better forwards since he is the vastly inferior defensemen.
I think its the other way around.

Girard is already signed. If they need to move him, they can.

Toews is the un-signed one.

They need to decide what theyre doing with Toews first. If they decide to sign Toews, Girard goes. IF they decide to walk away from Toews, they keep Girard.

Girard is the domino here.
If they move Girard, they'll know for certain they are re-signing Toews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niwotsblessing
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad