colors - i did it in like 10 minutes and i'm not getting paidFYI, it'll be a lot easier to read if you keep players the same colour throughout when they appear on multiple graphs.
It's also too difficult to project past next year. Somebody can breakout/decline a lot in the next year and then receive a raise or be looked at as a trade/buy out candidate.
In addition, a few minimum salary players (Marlies or any vet that follows the Giordano/Spezza path) makes it so that we have quite a bit of $ to fill out the roster.
The biggest need is to sign the big 3 forwards to reasonable caphits and (as importantly) long contracts. They're all young enough we shouldn't see a big decline in play at the end of 7 or 8yr contracts. However, we don't want to have to re-sign them in 3-4 years to even higher contract amounts.
We need to ice the best team we can the next 2 years with the understanding that our cap gets a lot more flexible in 2 years (post JT's 11m contract).
Moving Brodie doesn't improve our team... he's signed for a reasonable contract and we would either have to (likely) overpay a UFA or trade assets for his replacement.
We have enough room to add to our defense and next year (when his buyout penalty is 2.5m) is going to be much more cap restrictive than this year if we renew Matthews and Nylander (which we will definitely attempt to do).
Edit: To add, I think theres a definite possibility that Brodie could replace Giordano the following year as a good value contract (not less than 1m, but maybe 2-3m?).
![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f609.png)
100% players up and down and cheap vets or kids etc.. but in my opinion it's too much bloat because adding an actual impact player affects the monies so much. this has been setup where a GM needs to consistently hit home runs for any type of sustained long term post season success