JBB will trade him for a rental an enforcer like jeannotCurious as to when Howard is expected to make his debut. Feel like we could use an elc talent like him right now.
It does make sense why do you trade for Mac when you had the cap space to sign stamkos and now we don’tJBB will trade him for a rental an enforcer like jeannot
eklund has no sources, he is just a random person posting his delusions. don’t waste your time on this shitJBB will trade him for a rental an enforcer like jeannot
It does make sense why do you trade for Mac when you had the cap space to sign stamkos and now we don’t
I don’t think stamkos is going to Toronto I think it’s Tampa or a team in the states like Dallas or Nashvilleeklund has no sources, he is just a random person posting his delusions. don’t waste your time on this shit
This is the headline lolJBB will trade him for a rental an enforcer like jeannot
It does make sense why do you trade for Mac when you had the cap space to sign stamkos and now we don’t
Damn brother. Welcome aboard. That's as solid a 1st post as there's been hereHave been a Lightning fan from Day One. The games at the fairgrounds, win or lose, were a blast.
I am from the old school, where I root for the name on the front of the jersey, not the back. The players come and go, but I still love the Lightning.
I understand that this won’t fly with the majority of the board, but other than Kuch, I am not opposed to trading anyone if it improves the long term success of the team. If it takes Kuch, so be it.
We are being passed by other franchises both in the East and West, because of the salary restraints. Not blaming or pointing fingers at anyone.
TB was/is a destination spot for free agents. We can’t afford them. We have no draft capital and father time is ticking on the roster.
I don’t have a list of trades or roster moves to improve the team, I’ll leave that to others that research and follow such things. TBH, I live in Fort Worth and don’t even follow the Stars.
But as history repeats, it’s better to trade a player a year early than a year late.
Honestly, believe we could move a star or two, Stamkos and Serg come to mind and still be competitive. I know, rose color glasses. But I would hate to see a total crash similar to Chi or Pitt. Or be on a constant treadmill like LA, ANA, SJC.
If you have gotten this far, thanks for letting an old man rant.
I'm offendedDamn brother. Welcome aboard. That's as solid a 1st post as there's been here
I'm gonna call bullocks and say more like a team checked in on Jeannot and we gave some neutral answer like we would "make the trade if it made sense" and now it's been leaked to the media by the team that checked in. But one of the insiders does usually have a track on us. @DFC wasn't it Friedman that usually gets us right? Every time you point it out I see it ans then forget about itFriedman has also said that Tanner Jeannot is officially on our trade block.
7th rounder incomingFriedman has also said that Tanner Jeannot is officially on our trade block.
I have a hard time believing that would be our only cap dump. Doest really do much. Brings our space to like $7.5M. Enought for Stamkos and some low level shit. Also just created another forward hole by dumping Tanner.Friedman has also said that Tanner Jeannot is officially on our trade block.
it was lebrun. But I think he and Yzerman were/are friends.I'm gonna call bullocks and say more like a team checked in on Jeannot and we gave some neutral answer like we would "make the trade if it made sense" and now it's been leaked to the media by the team that checked in. But one of the insiders does usually have a track on us. @DFC wasn't it Friedman that usually gets us right? Every time you point it out I see it ans then forget about it
We don't "completely" agree often but this is one time we do. I'm good with either but I am leaning towards Cirelli by a very wide margin. I know the 5 on 5 numbers for Stamkos are bad. But I think it's because he is literally Cirelli's conjoined twin at even strength and forced onto the wing where he is not comfortable. And Cirelli doesn't take risks anymore. He isn't that cavalier bottom line player he once was because he is expected to be a 2C who is responsible. If he's even a freaking electron out of place, the goal he scored is called GI or offsides. Or the puck goes into the net off his stick and not blocked with his foot. He is suffocating. Stamkos had Duclair for 1 night and looked like a different player. We had 2 lines that could score and won at like a 75% clip and were undone by the (as Engblom loves to call it) "static power play" where everyone just moves as slowly as Kucherov does and the Cats predicted every play before it happened.it was lebrun. But I think he and Yzerman were/are friends.
I think Friedman is just reading the obvious here. We need money. Jeannot is a piece we can trim.
I still think we need a major move. Either Cirelli or Sergachev. And I think it will happen. I would prefer Sergachev move. The return would be great.
You're 19,940 posts late saying that.I'm offended
I'd move Cernak and Jeannot as a package. Cernak, for how good he can be, can't stay healthy. Jeannot is a great enforcer, especially since not one nail has popped out of the bench since he got here.If there moving jeannot then there going to also move sheary . So I see there not wanting to move cirell or cernak then.
LeBrun still has a pretty good track record with the Lightning.Yeah I don’t think any of the insiders have a track on us anymore. In the Yzerman days there was LeBrun, that French-Canadian guy from TSA (?) and I think it was Kyper who broke the Gagne trade and some others.
JBB is running a tight ship.
I don't think Stamkos is going anywhere. Dumba saying he is leaving makes me think we are holding onto Sergachev because otherwise he'd have been an easy solution. But it's just as likely that I'm wrongYou try and move Sergachev (better return and frees more cap) until July 1st and shift to Cirelli after July 1st if Stamkos hasn't already moved on elsewhere.