Well she pretty much admits to nothing happening and also says another accuser ("Gabi"?) actually hurt herself, not Antony. This is beginning to look like a Brazilian telenovela.Don't go down that road please.
We've seen women in the past do all they can to win the battle knowing they were going to lose from the start, i.e.: Varlamov with his ex-wife/girlfriend, Amber Heard (though she and Depp are both nuts), or women staying with their *abusive* boyfriends/husbands right when they (males) were going to break up with them (females). Antony calling her words and all of that doesn't mean he's wrong in all of this. She could be crazy as he declares as mental problems aren't strictly male. However, she says she has photographic evidence of the abuse in pictures, which could be a big-time losing battle for Antony. The only problem with her testimony as of now is that he abused her multiple times yet she still stayed with him. And this isn't because she physically and financially relied upon him as we see in other relationships where women sadly take it. She is a freakin' supermodel and musical star, she can get almost any bloke on earth with her looks alone. Let's see how this plays out because Antony's side is hellbent that he's innocent in all of this.
So Antony can't even properly cross the ball and now he's being labelled as a master manipulator of people by your standards now?You have an abysmal understanding of why victims stay with abusers and how abusers are able to get away consequence free
So Antony can't even properly cross the ball and now he's being labelled as a master manipulator of people by your standards now?
Oh, so you are a manipulator and you know exactly what goes through an abuser's head then? Makes sense, claiming how ridiculously right you think you are.Even people with rocks for brains are capable of manipulation, and as said above there, are could be millions of reasons for why she chose to stay
Oh, so you are a manipulator and you know exactly what goes through an abuser's head then? Makes sense, claiming how ridiculously right you think you are.
I mean, you're calling me daft by claiming that you know better than I do. When you make that proposition in a discussion or argument, it needs to come with some data or something to back up your claim or I am allowed to assume as much as you just did with me. So either you have studied sociology or psychology, you're either a manipulator or a victim, or you read a Rolling Stones article and now you're claiming yourself as an expert. I never mentioned your premise was wrong at all, a million aspects can influence why somebody is with somebody, but your entire statement rests on the propensity that it's way too complex for us and that doesn't really solve the problem (just puts it in an endless cycle). I am here to try to solve problems and my main axiom is that being financially secure solves a lot of those "million reasons" why somebody would lose senses and stay with somebody who physically abuses them, especially enough where it left marks and that she supposedly took pictures off. So either she has a certain level of naivety in her logic or some of this stuff could be made up to garner social, political, and public support in a battle she could lose when more information gets exposed. If she did truly get abused, she needs to see someone who can help understand why she decided to stay and Antony needs to be attached to a horse and galloped through a cobblestone street.Log off.
Holy shit... wtf man.So Antony can't even properly cross the ball and now he's being labelled as a master manipulator of people by your standards now?
You’re surprised?Holy shit... wtf man.
If you treat grown-up athletes well, 90% of them will bust their ass for you.