Csonked Out
Registered User
His contract is going to suck as well. Trading 2nd overall plus paying more than 9 million per would be tough to to swallow
Lack of team control definitely significantly diminished the return for DeBrincat, not surprising we weren't dangling #2 if he won't discuss an extension.
Problem is analytics types value Pick#2 a lot more than Pick 7. If the Devils had 5-6 I think they would have done it. For example, look at Dom from the Athletc's model. Picks 2 and 7 have a large difference in value.
View attachment 565619
Blackhawks might wind up with DeBrincat back in town for he 2023-24 season.That doesn’t seem to make sense for either team nor Debrincat. All parties should have wanted some discussion unless Chicago thinks Debrincat is going to be firm about wanting something short to take him right to UFA.
Fantastic point.Problem is analytics types value Pick#2 a lot more than Pick 7. If the Devils had 5-6 I think they would have done it. For example, look at Dom from the Athletc's model. Picks 2 and 7 have a large difference in value.
View attachment 565619
I didn't realize there were NFL-like charts out there but that makes sense.#2 pick is worth 727 points according to some internet draft pick value charts.
#7 is worth 419 & #39 is worth 97
NJ would have been paying a lot more to get him than Ottawa paid.
On the bright side now we can look forward to the pick. To me Debrincat was the only guy who was realistically available that I’d trade #2 for.
Agreed, there’s nobody left to move that pick for now. In Fitz’s press conference it sounded like moving down was an option though, so wouldn’t be shocked if we don’t make the pick at 2.
This really shows how bad a lot of posters here are at valuing players that are only a year or so away from UFA. Some posters here actually thought the Devils would have to add to 2OA to get DeBrincat - LOL
Fitz better have deals on the table if so. Draft clock is only like 6-7 minutes long.the pick is still in play if montreal takes slaf. we could get a serious haul
It would be a haul of picks though....it'd have to be a lot to be worth it and even then it wouldn't exactly help us in the near-term. If you wanted something to help in the near term DeBrincat was the only one even worth discussing #2 over but that shouldn't have been on the table once an extension was off it.the pick is still in play if montreal takes slaf. we could get a serious haul
Which is why I'm also categorically against signing the soon to be 29 years old Gaudreau to a long term deal. That's just bad allocation of your cap for a player heading for the downhill of his career.
the pick is still in play if montreal takes slaf. we could get a serious haul
Same. Zero interest in trading down for lesser prospects. We need to draft the player with THE HIGHEST ceiling / talent possible . Not multiple ones with lesser talent. We have enough of those types of prospects already.I have no interest in moving down a few spots and picking up a 2nd rounder or something. If those are the deals on the table, just pick Wright or Cooley at 2.
I would prefer moving the pick outright for someone who can help immediately, but who knows whats available.
Fitz better have deals on the table if so. Draft clock is only like 6-7 minutes long.
It would be a haul of picks though....it'd have to be a lot to be worth it and even then it wouldn't exactly help us in the near-term. If you wanted something to help in the near term DeBrincat was the only one even worth discussing #2 over but that shouldn't have been on the table once an extension was off it.
peaked already? LOL!!!You should try looking at some of the players that have been selected #2 overall in NHL history. And he most certainly is in his prime and possibly beyond it. Snipers peak in their early 20s quite often.
i’m sure there are contingency plans in place with GM’s who want wright.
i wouldn’t want just picks back either, but you don’t think any more players will be traded today? just debrincat?
Thachuk's not getting dealt today...who else is conceivably on the market that's even worth discussing #2 over and don't say JT Miller.i’m sure there are contingency plans in place with GM’s who want wright.
i wouldn’t want just picks back either, but you don’t think any more players will be traded today? just debrincat?
I have no interest in moving down a few spots and picking up a 2nd rounder or something. If those are the deals on the table, just pick Wright or Cooley at 2.
I would prefer moving the pick outright for someone who can help immediately, but who knows whats available.