NotProkofievian
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 25,042
- 25,760
Jiricek's knee looks good.
The kid gives me Seider vibes.
Knee looks fine to me. Wonder if he'll make the WC team.
Jiricek's knee looks good.
The kid gives me Seider vibes.
He is even more purely talended than Seider, thats how good he is.
Ive had this guy ranked #1 since early november. Now Im ambivalent between him and Slafkovsky, top 2 is a no brainer for me, you cant go wrong with either, they are absolute elite material.
Wright shut down again tonight for a 2nd straight game and almost gave Ottawa the win on a silver plate in OT. I dont know how much the broken foot he suffered is affecting his game, but I dont recall the last time he beat a goaltender cleanly, his shoting attemps are predictable and either get stopped or blocked by defenders. There is alot of inconsistency in his play, he had a good stretch lately, but then, 2 underwhelming showings in a row...
That inconsistency and lack of dominance at junior level just cant make me rank him on the same level as the clear cut top 2 and probably not even over Kemell or Nemec either.
Jiricek is a better player than Seider was at this time in 2019, that's pretty clear. But Seider is also 10x the player he was on draft day.
Snuggerud at 49.. I wish
If MTL gets Ohgren at 29 that s a steal in my opinion…
If MTL gets Ohgren at 29 that s a steal in my opinion…
They should focus there anyways. Outside of the first two rounds, the CHL is ass.Looking at the early bird mock, Okay fine guys we can use the 3rds and 4ths to trade up this time.
...just this time though.
We've got 2 2nds, 3 3rds (two of them early), and 3 4ths. No sense trying to trade up with our 2nd, as there will for sure be a good player available. We could move up the Edmonton pick with a 3rd, and then use our other 3rds to move into the end of the 2nd. Or we could pick up a couple extra late 2nds using 3rds and 4ths.
Alternatively we could just bias our picks to Europeans and Americans since we hold their rights for longer, giving us more time to sort out the (hopeful) log jam of prospects.
No tough decision with the 1st pick OA, you take Wright and you have your #1 C for the next 20 yrs. We absolutely need to win the lottery, it would be a difference maker for the futur of the CanadiensYour posts make me think that not winning the lottery would be the best option, let another team make that difficult decision
Agree with you on thisMy top-5 and draft order based on where we land:
Wright
Cooley
Jiricek
Slafkovsky
Nemec
No surprises with Wright, he’s going #1. I think Cooley has the best set of tools offensively and not only will be BPA at #2, but he’s something we desperately need in our top-6.
Jiricek I think has more offensive upside than Nemec and if proper developed, he has top-pairing potential with offence.
Slafkovsky I am a little torn about putting ahead of Nemec but I think if we pick him, he has the potential to be a complete beast on the wings. That said, he’s a project.
Nemec is great and would be happy picking him outside the top-3. Could easily pick him over Slaf at #4 also.
They should focus there anyways. Outside of the first two rounds, the CHL is ass.
My top-5 and draft order based on where we land:
Wright
Cooley
Jiricek
Slafkovsky
Nemec
No surprises with Wright, he’s going #1. I think Cooley has the best set of tools offensively and not only will be BPA at #2, but he’s something we desperately need in our top-6.
Jiricek I think has more offensive upside than Nemec and if properly developed, he has top-pairing potential with offence and vision we desparaply need in the backend.
Slafkovsky I am a little torn about putting ahead of Nemec but I think if we pick him, he has the potential to be a complete beast on the wings. That said, he’s a project.
Nemec is great and would be happy picking him outside the top-3. Could easily pick him over Slaf at #4 also.
They should focus there anyways. Outside of the first two rounds, the CHL is ass.
I dont understand your point. If I understand you correctly, in the span of 3 months, Seider went from being inferior to Jiricek to being x10 the player he is about 90 days later?Jiricek is a better player than Seider was at this time in 2019, that's pretty clear. But Seider is also 10x the player he was on draft day.
I dont understand your point. If I understand you correctly, in the span of 3 months, Seider went from being inferior to Jiricek to being x10 the player he is about 90 days later?
I think he meant that Seider now is 10x the player Seider was on draft day.I dont understand your point. If I understand you correctly, in the span of 3 months, Seider went from being inferior to Jiricek to being x10 the player he is about 90 days later?
He developed well for sure, but the physical aspect of his game as well as his mastering defensive play were elite level already. Where he made huge strides is mostly offensively, his offensive tools were more raw.No, I mean that Seider has developed amazingly well, which is not a guarantee for any prospect. The Seider of today is 10x the player he was on draft day.
If we draft 2 or 3 probably could trade down to 4 or 5 get an extra pick around 30Is there any way we can get 5 top 50 picks this year? We could definitely trade up with Edmonton's 2nd into the 40's. But then how far can we get with the remaining 3rds and 4ths?
EDM 2nd + our 3rd gets us how far, vs EDM 2nd + CAR 3rd. The ducks 3rd is somewhere in between obvs.