Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,695
- 13,371
That’s why you can’t make a blanket statement, like you did.
That’s makes those picks even better then.
huh? there's a clear pattern of passing on upside for safe projectability.
That’s why you can’t make a blanket statement, like you did.
That’s makes those picks even better then.
It was already pointed out to you , Stutzle and Sanderson, hence the blanket statement argument failure is applicable.huh? there's a clear pattern of passing on upside for safe projectability.
huh? there's a clear pattern of passing on upside for safe projectability.
Nazar = NevarHi there. My name is Qward, not really but for this argument it is.
I am here to tell you, that if Ottawa does NOT trade away the 7th overall, they need to draft Frank Nazar.
Have a good day.
Here is the list of players taking part in the combine.
It was already pointed out to you , Stutzle and Sanderson, hence the blanket statement argument failure is applicable.
I suppose you wanted Zadina as well then.
Along with numerous others, forget about Karlsson already.
Here is the list of players taking part in the combine.
Teams aren’t going to value diminutive players with skating issues. They don’t translate in the NHLJordan Dumais is getting such a raw deal this draft.. Guy puts up 39 goals and 109 points in the Q at 17 and doesn't even get a combine invite? Brutall
At least we both got are 3 and 5 picks,and as pointed out those were 3 and 5 picks in one of the deepest drafts ever and they still went for the players who were the most projectable/physically dominant.
I actually wanted Stutzle and Sanderson and was making posts arguing that they might be worthy #1 picks themselves. So I loved that we got them. These types of players are unicorns and only available at the very top of the draft.
No not, Zadina but Hughes and Dobson.
From the footage I've seen, I'm pretty skeptical his game translates to the NHL. He has good vision and IQ but he is undersized, is an average skater and I'm concerned about whether his shot and passes will be quick enough at the NHL level. Maybe him not being invited to the combine influenced my assessment, but from watching some footage on him,. it seems pretty clear to me why teams aren't that high on him.Jordan Dumais is getting such a raw deal this draft.. Guy puts up 39 goals and 109 points in the Q at 17 and doesn't even get a combine invite? Brutall
I've just about had enough of your anti-Nazar attitude mister!Nazar = Nevar
That is one of the comps that makes sense imo.Marco Kasper has a little bit of that Mika Zibanejad feel. Super raw, explosive athlete that attacks the middle. Powerful skater, covers a ton of ice. Has the potential to be a high-end puck transporter in the NHL.
Maybe 7 is a little high for him, but if the disaster scenario plays out [Wright, Slafkovsky, Cooley, Nemec, Jiricek, Gauthier are the first 6 picks] then I probably wouldn't hate to hear his name.
Or Kemell, Savoie or GeekieMarco Kasper has a little bit of that Mika Zibanejad feel. Super raw, explosive athlete that attacks the middle. Powerful skater, covers a ton of ice. Has the potential to be a high-end puck transporter in the NHL.
Maybe 7 is a little high for him, but if the disaster scenario plays out [Wright, Slafkovsky, Cooley, Nemec, Jiricek, Gauthier are the first 6 picks] then I probably wouldn't hate to hear his name.
That would be a big disappointment for me - I wouldn't take Savoie or Geekie in the top 10. Not even sure I'd draft Geekie top 15.Or Kemell, Savoie or Geekie
it kinda gives me Connor Garland vibes draft status wise, not so much player style.Teams aren’t going to value diminutive players with skating issues. They don’t translate in the NHL
Someone will grab him late 2nd and hold out hope for years.
Marco Kasper has a little bit of that Mika Zibanejad feel. Super raw, explosive athlete that attacks the middle. Powerful skater, covers a ton of ice. Has the potential to be a high-end puck transporter in the NHL.
Maybe 7 is a little high for him, but if the disaster scenario plays out [Wright, Slafkovsky, Cooley, Nemec, Jiricek, Gauthier are the first 6 picks] then I probably wouldn't hate to hear his name.
Sounds like Garland in jr. I saw him play Gatineau a few times and I was sure he was never going to play in the league. Boy was I wrong. Sens dont have alot of skill types like this in the system. Maybe take him with Tampas second rounder? Its going to be in the 60 range.From the footage I've seen, I'm pretty skeptical his game translates to the NHL. He has good vision and IQ but he is undersized, is an average skater and I'm concerned about whether his shot and passes will be quick enough at the NHL level. Maybe him not being invited to the combine influenced my assessment, but from watching some footage on him,. it seems pretty clear to me why teams aren't that high on him.
This kid could be a good option with our late 2nd / early 3rd
Isn't Garland gritty and doesn't he have some agitating qualities? I'm not sure Dumais has those qualities.Sounds like Garland in jr. I saw him play Gatineau a few times and I was sure he was never going to play in the league. Boy was I wrong. Sens dont have alot of skill types like this in the system. Maybe take him with Tampas second rounder? Its going to be in the 60 range.