Hmm. Goodly point. I thought I saw him listed as a RW somewhere.Isn't he a LW?
Hmm. Goodly point. I thought I saw him listed as a RW somewhere.Isn't he a LW?
Wright put up a 120 pt pace in the second half of the year and people are still shitting on him. Slafkovsky dominates the Bobby Butler Open and is the next big thing. Wouldn't cry about taking him at two but to think he would go over Wright is delusionalSeriously. Why wouldn’t anyone want the best asset of the draft for free? Trade down, trade or package for a great established NHLer, or, shockingly, even just make the selection.
I think the lukewarm narrative surrounding Wright has gotten so exaggerated that he’s really getting sold short on his potential.
The same thing happened to Power last year.
No.Is Slafkovsky a guy that steps in immediately next year?
We have two of the best in the league in Bratt and Hughes. We need a big bitch to make room for those two yet keep up (physically and hockey IQ ) and Slaf is thatHe’s no Cooley. He’s more of a passenger than play driver, we need play drivers.
How often does that happen in the NHL? Almost never, seems GM's never are willing to pay the price to trade up at the top of the draft. If this was next yr and we essentially had Michkov? COMPLETELY different storyi don't see why we can't trade down 1-2 spots and pick up one of the d-men? depends on the add, but it could be really useful
No, Habs will not risk the opportunity to get a Canadian franchise player for the next 15 years. They need a top 6 C and Wright is the universal consensus #1 pick. Montreal will not get cute.Hubs deffinitly pick Slafkovsky. The winger is they prime need to complete line with Suzuki-Caufield , Slavkovsky is decided if they hold 1OA
Jiricek devils!!!!!!
I agree but how can you 100% gaurentee it unless you trade down 2 spots maximum and are ok with either /or.i don't see why we can't trade down 1-2 spots and pick up one of the d-men? depends on the add, but it could be really useful
I understand liking Wright a lot but let's not act as if dominating in the OLYMPICS as a 17 year old is some small feat.Wright put up a 120 pt pace in the second half of the year and people are still shitting on him. Slafkovsky dominates the Bobby Butler Open and is the next big thing. Wouldn't cry about taking him at two but to think he would go over Wright is delusional
habs are 100% without a doubt picking wright.
any even slight HINT otherwise is smokescreen
For a guy his size thatd be disappointing
Height and weight have little to do with it. Processing the game at NHL speed is the issue. Most teens can't do it, regardless of how big.If the guy is 6'4" and as heavy as websites say, I doubt he wouldnt play next year. Thatd be odd
It's not a great one eitherI understand liking Wright a lot but let's not act as if dominating in the OLYMPICS as a 17 year old is some small feat.
For a guy his size thatd be disappointing
I dont need him to set the league on fire but Id like a 6'4" 218 2nd overall to start Opening night
Still possible we just go Jiricek . Either just by takig him at 2 or trading down. It’s not 100% guaranteed we go Slaf. I’d say more like,y but nothig is certain.We’ll pick Slaf and I don’t want him. At 5 we’d end up with either Nemec or Jiricek who I’d much prefer
yeah intention would have to be down to 4 lowest. i guess it depends on who our scouts like, and if they're all the same tierI agree but how can you 100% gaurentee it unless you trade down 2 spots maximum and are ok with either /or.
It's not a great one either
Id imagine size matters greatly for an 18yo joining the NHLHeight and weight have little to do with it. Processing the game at NHL speed is the issue. Most teens can't do it, regardless of how big.
i don't see why we can't trade down 1-2 spots and pick up one of the d-men? depends on the add, but it could be really useful