The term, cap hit and injury history are too high for it to go smoothly for both parties, if someone is really a #1 RD away from playoffs they'll probably give a call.Is there any possibility that EK65 actually plays his way into a trade ?? Or is that contract impossible to move midseason ?
Josh Norris hasn’t panned out. He’s out for the year with a shoulder injury. People are now worried his career is in jeopardy as he has had shoulder problems for a long time. We can take that information, twist it, ignore context, and eventually come to the conclusion that he is another stain on DW Jr’s record.DW Jr turned our drafting around everyone! Just ignore the fact that the only one of his picks that has panned out so far is Josh Norris who the organization viewed as a future 3C then traded.
Before anyone brings up Ferraro, the guy is a third pairing defenseman and not even a good one. There's nothing useful he does at a NHL average level. He has looked so awful this season without Burns to prop him up.
I'd add Ferraro to that list as well. By the time we're good again he won't be. But I doubt any team will trade for him.Guys that I’d like to see move before the TDL:
James Reimer: this one is obvious. Kahkonen has played well for the most part and Reimer has played really well. I could see TOR, MIN, VAN, PIT, NJD, DAL, LAK, BUF, CHI being interested to various levels. Given our relationship with MIN and Fleury just straight crapping out so far, I’m going to guess there for Peart+3rd.
Nick Bonino: another obvious one. Contract up after this year and his replacement already in house. Probably goes to a team that needs bottom 6 help. Interested teams: FLA, COL, PHI, PIT, BUF. This return really depends how and when he comes back. I’m going to guess a 4th in return.
Matt Nieto: dude actually has turned it around A LITTLE bit this season and showed a little bit more offensive awareness. That combined with his PK ability, I think pretty much every playoff team will be interested. I’d ask a 3rd in return but would settle for a 4th.
Noah Gregor: I’m genuinely not sure what we could get in return for him. I’d be looking for a similar ability/age defenseman. Maybe to PIT for Ty Smith or PO Joseph? They don’t have room for both on their team and Gregor could be a good winger for them.
Alex Barabanov: I think this is a sell high situation. He’s looked good enough. He’s also signed for not very much and I think we already have replacements in house. Id ask a 2nd+prospect but settle for just a 2nd.
Timo Meier: this one is entirely just to embrace the tank. Give me Holtz+1st and put Holtz with Hertl and Eklund and see what happens.
I wouldn’t simply because at that point we then have EK and a bunch of at best 7Ds. I get wanting to be bad but that’s going to put our defensive prospects in a real weird spot. Unless someone is giving up a first+ for him, I’d keep him.I'd add Ferraro to that list as well. By the time we're good again he won't be. But I doubt any team will trade for him.
Agreed that these are who we should be looking to move. Of course, if someone calls about others, you listen.Guys that I’d like to see move before the TDL:
James Reimer: this one is obvious. Kahkonen has played well for the most part and Reimer has played really well. I could see TOR, MIN, VAN, PIT, NJD, DAL, LAK, BUF, CHI being interested to various levels. Given our relationship with MIN and Fleury just straight crapping out so far, I’m going to guess there for Peart+3rd.
Nick Bonino: another obvious one. Contract up after this year and his replacement already in house. Probably goes to a team that needs bottom 6 help. Interested teams: FLA, COL, PHI, PIT, BUF. This return really depends how and when he comes back. I’m going to guess a 4th in return.
Matt Nieto: dude actually has turned it around A LITTLE bit this season and showed a little bit more offensive awareness. That combined with his PK ability, I think pretty much every playoff team will be interested. I’d ask a 3rd in return but would settle for a 4th.
Noah Gregor: I’m genuinely not sure what we could get in return for him. I’d be looking for a similar ability/age defenseman. Maybe to PIT for Ty Smith or PO Joseph? They don’t have room for both on their team and Gregor could be a good winger for them.
Alex Barabanov: I think this is a sell high situation. He’s looked good enough. He’s also signed for not very much and I think we already have replacements in house. Id ask a 2nd+prospect but settle for just a 2nd.
Timo Meier: this one is entirely just to embrace the tank. Give me Holtz+1st and put Holtz with Hertl and Eklund and see what happens.
I kind of wonder if, league-wide, we've seen a shift away from the traditional "contender goes all-in" philosophy that guys like DW loved. GMs are valuing youth, picks, and comprehensive team-building more than ever. It just won Colorado a cup...Hope that Grier is aware of when the cards are on his hands, meaning Reimer has a very big value now because of some playoff teams like Toronto/Colorado/Edmonton etc. not having a playoff goalie tandem (Georgiev is good, but I don't believe he can take them far in the playoffs) (Campbell is a wild card, I think he can be better)
About the other trade assets I think only Timo can get you a reasonable/great package back.
But the main thing is that if I'm Grier, I only trade him if he brings the maximum value back. Others pieces have medium to low value, but I don't think you need to sell everything. There needs to be some veteran pieces to play with upcoming prospects.
I just hope Grier doesn't sell cheap, we want value.
It's going to be interesting season in a lot of ways and I think by the 2023 draft we'll have a very clear image of what is the direction.
I think with Bonino, it’s entirely one of those overvalued vets that has playoff experience and can play C. That’s where most of value lies. Basically the same as Cogliano last year.Agreed that these are who we should be looking to move. Of course, if someone calls about others, you listen.
I like the Reimer to MIN match. Agreed that Nieto has increased his trade value too.
I'm more pessimistic about Bonino's and Gregor's value. Not sure how many would be interested in those two at any cost right now.
I’d take back cap dumps for EK for sure but damn he’s a fantastic player that would cost a lot.Dear NHL GMs,
Look what getting a guy like Jeff Petry can do for your team, imagine Erik Karlsson on your team!
He's revived Crosby to the tune of 11 points in 7 games.
Petry recently led his Canadiens to the Stanley Cup finals too.
I think we are to some extent. Part of this is probably by necessity, with the cap not going up as it was expected to, but it's forced a lot of managers into utilizing more young players on good teams instead of filling those roles entirely with higher-priced veterans.I kind of wonder if, league-wide, we've seen a shift away from the traditional "contender goes all-in" philosophy that guys like DW loved. GMs are valuing youth, picks, and comprehensive team-building more than ever. It just won Colorado a cup...
Trading Karlsson for a worse player with less term on his contract would be a net positive in the long run.I’d rather just keep Karlsson. No one is going to trade for him realistically without us either retaining a massive amount of salary or sending us back an equally horrible contract, and the difference there is that Karlsson is actually good.
Ferraro, Reimer, Bonino, and Meier would be the guys I’d actively look to trade, with the caveat being I wouldn’t trade Meier unless the offer genuinely makes sense, whereas I’d move the others for whatever the best offer is.
Before the season started I would have jumped at that. I just can’t see us throwing away a 1D for cap relief. I get wanting to be bad but they need to put something on the ice. I’d guess EK and Hertl are basically untouchable and Ferraro, Couture are only for overpayment.Send EK to Dallas for Jamie Benn or something. Start this rebuild up
objectively false.Trading Karlsson for a worse player with less term on his contract would be a net positive in the long run.
So Benning’s deal isn’t bad because it can be MOSTLY buried but Pederson’s deal is bad because it can be fully buried?It’s mind boggling how badly Doug Wilson lost every single negotiation down to the smallest ones over the last 5+ years. He extended Lane Pederson, who had zero leverage, to a two year contract that’s a one way deal this year. Aka a $750k guaranteed cash payout to a player who’s too terrible to ever warrant a call up from the minors. TWO teams have now dumped this deal to ease the sting of retaining salary on the other player in the trade.
I'm glad I refreshed the page, because I was going to make this exact post. Hodge posting half a paragraph to nitpick the Lane Pederson signing is the most Hodge thing I have seen at this point.So Benning’s deal isn’t bad because it can be MOSTLY buried but Pederson’s deal is bad because it can be fully buried?
Any time you're paying someone a NHL salary to play in the AHL you made a bad deal. The difference is that Pederson actually is buried while Benning is playing well in top four minutes in the NHL.So Benning’s deal isn’t bad because it can be MOSTLY buried but Pederson’s deal is bad because it can be fully buried?
Well?Any time you're paying someone a NHL salary to play in the AHL you made a bad deal. The difference is that Pederson actually is buried while Benning is playing well in top four minutes in the NHL.