Speculation: 2022-23 Sharks Roster Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pavelski2112

Bold as Boognish
Dec 15, 2011
14,792
9,817
San Jose, California
I think the Bordeleau ship has sailed. We definitely don't need RyJo though.
I think Bords still has potential but he looked worse the most recent callup than the first time around for sure.

If COL wanted a good 2C they should've just traded for Couture. He's older but healthier and has a far more proven playoff track record.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,838
8,125
I think Bords still has potential but he looked worse the most recent callup than the first time around for sure.

If COL wanted a good 2C they should've just traded for Couture. He's older but healthier and has a far more proven playoff track record.
He was so awful. It's not like Quinn didn't give him cushy minutes either. I wish we had traded him for a better prospect last year when he still had some shine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sharkz4Fun

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,413
21,321
Vegass
I think the Bordeleau ship has sailed. We definitely don't need RyJo though.
My point was more there’s a better chance of Bordeleau being a productive center going forward than RJ at this point simply because Ryan’s basically cooked. He turned into RJ Umberger basically overnight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,838
8,125
My point was more there’s a better chance of Bordeleau being a productive center going forward than RJ at this point simply because Ryan’s basically cooked. He turned into RJ Umberger basically overnight.
The ankle injury is definitely concerning for a guy who was already slow but he did score 63 points just one season ago. Getting him at 4Mx2 is a shrewd buy low move by Colorado.
 

Sharkz4Fun

Registered User
Feb 8, 2023
864
867
He was so awful. It's not like Quinn didn't give him cushy minutes either. I wish we had traded him for a better prospect last year when he still had some shine.
Hope he is the guy MG throws out there in talks if any and not anyone else. He's probably the 5th or 6th best forward prospect now.
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,864
6,363
What would RJ have brought to them team we can’t probably get from Bordeleau?
Not now; I mean back when the Sharks were competing. It's a sharp move from Sakic. DW was pretty good at going for the big fish, but not as good at maximizing cap space.
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,864
6,363
I think Bords still has potential but he looked worse the most recent callup than the first time around for sure.

If COL wanted a good 2C they should've just traded for Couture. He's older but healthier and has a far more proven playoff track record.
Couture would have cost more, and I'm not sure Couture would waive his NMC.

He has played 16 nhl games and is 21. It seems premature to write him off.
It'd be definitely premature to write him off as an NHL player, but he's unlikely to be a significant contributor at this point.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,838
8,125
He has played 16 nhl games and is 21. It seems premature to write him off.
He hasn't shown any indication he can stick as a top six forward and was never an amazing prospect to begin with. It's not like we're talking about Quinton Byfield here. I don't think Bordeleau has the size or motor to reinvent himself as a bottom six forward either.
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,413
21,321
Vegass
The ankle injury is definitely concerning for a guy who was already slow but he did score 63 points just one season ago. Getting him at 4Mx2 is a shrewd buy low move by Colorado.
For a team competing it makes perfect sense. Bringing him aboard for us, even for free would have done nothing.

He hasn't shown any indication he can stick as a top six forward and was never an amazing prospect to begin with. It's not like we're talking about Quinton Byfield here. I don't think Bordeleau has the size or motor to reinvent himself as a bottom six forward either.
I think he’s creative enough to be a solid top 6 piece. I don’t think what he showed last year was indicative of anything. He looked good at Michigan and at the WJC so looking unsure of himself in a ten game stint at the end of a completely disastrous sharks season doesn’t really concern me. Frankly, no one aside from Gregor or Eklund looked good after the Timo trade.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,838
8,125
For a team competing it makes perfect sense. Bringing him aboard for us, even for free would have done nothing.


I think he’s creative enough to be a solid top 6 piece. I don’t think what he showed last year was indicative of anything. He looked good at Michigan and at the WJC so looking unsure of himself in a ten game stint at the end of a completely disastrous sharks season doesn’t really concern me. Frankly, no one aside from Gregor or Eklund looked good after the Timo trade.
I dunno, I watched every game of that summer WJC and he looked lost without the puck and wasn't even making many impressive passes. I think he got overrated after his freshman year at Michigan because we didn't have any other good prospects at the time and was never anything special.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaucholoco3

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,413
21,321
Vegass
I dunno, I watched every game of that summer WJC and he looked lost without the puck and wasn't even making many impressive passes. I think he got overrated after his freshman year at Michigan because we didn't have any other good prospects at the time and was never anything special.
I think he definitely looks better with the puck on his stick. The rest is something I firmly believe can be developed over time. He’s still only 21
 

Sharkz4Fun

Registered User
Feb 8, 2023
864
867
I dunno, I watched every game of that summer WJC and he looked lost without the puck and wasn't even making many impressive passes. I think he got overrated after his freshman year at Michigan because we didn't have any other good prospects at the time and was never anything special.
He was overrated at Michigan because he was playing with players better than him
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,838
8,125
He was overrated at Michigan because he was playing with players better than him
That too, especially on the power play. I'm biased because I've never liked Bordeleau's game but it's not looking good for him.
 

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
33,191
13,891
I think Bords still has potential but he looked worse the most recent callup than the first time around for sure.

If COL wanted a good 2C they should've just traded for Couture. He's older but healthier and has a far more proven playoff track record.
He started playing harder in the last couple games of the season but he doesn't really have the puck battle instincts of a winger.
 

Levie

Registered User
Mar 15, 2011
14,667
4,483
He was overrated at Michigan because he was playing with players better than him
I think it's safe to say most people on this board, myself included, probably overrated DW Jr's drafting largely because his draft picks signified a departure from Burke.

It's looking like we're going to get a lot of goose eggs in the previous regime's drafting.
 

Grinner

Registered User
May 31, 2022
1,897
1,493
I think it's safe to say most people on this board, myself included, probably overrated DW Jr's drafting largely because his draft picks signified a departure from Burke.

It's looking like we're going to get a lot of goose eggs in the previous regime's drafting.
Overrated? His picks sucked from start to finish
 

Pavelski2112

Bold as Boognish
Dec 15, 2011
14,792
9,817
San Jose, California
He hasn't shown any indication he can stick as a top six forward and was never an amazing prospect to begin with. It's not like we're talking about Quinton Byfield here. I don't think Bordeleau has the size or motor to reinvent himself as a bottom six forward either.
It's not his size that worries me, it's his play away from the puck, which thankfully can be taught. That said, he needs to put in the work.
 

Grinner

Registered User
May 31, 2022
1,897
1,493
I mean that's revisionist history. I would say most of the board liked his picks when they happened.
[/QUOTE

Oh no! I very posted here under another name as well
Groo. Feel free to see what I've felt about Jr's drafts
Revisionist my ass
 

Sharkz4Fun

Registered User
Feb 8, 2023
864
867
I think it's safe to say most people on this board, myself included, probably overrated DW Jr's drafting largely because his draft picks signified a departure from Burke.

It's looking like we're going to get a lot of goose eggs in the previous regime's drafting.
What's crazy is as bad as Burke's picks historically have been, Jr's may have been worse in the end. He'll have essentially nothing to show at all for his entire tenure other than possibly Eklund/Gushchin. Imagine spending FOUR YEARS scouting and ending up for the most part not drafting a single NHL player other than one that kinda fell into your hands. I'm shocked he found a job somewhere else. At least Burke found people here and there.
 

mogambomoroo

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2020
1,820
3,155
It's a lot about development too, I feel safer under the MG regime in this case. If MG gets couple of more picks and picks players without reaching too much, the 2023 draft class will get everything they need from the organization to succeed. Even though I grew up in the DW era and mostly got interested in drafting in DWJr era, I really like that those days are over now, it was time to move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
33,191
13,891
It's a lot about development too, I feel safer under the MG regime in this case. If MG gets couple of more picks and picks players without reaching too much, the 2023 draft class will get everything they need from the organization to succeed. Even though I grew up in the DW era and mostly got interested in drafting in DWJr era, I really like that those days are over now, it was time to move on.
I was always kind of jealous of the way other orgs were modernizing in terms of sports science, development, analytics, etc. So kinda glad to move on from DW's old school FO. Hoping that MG's FO is more modern or at least up to date.
 

themelkman

Always Delivers
Apr 26, 2015
11,728
8,802
Calgary, Alberta
It's a lot about development too, I feel safer under the MG regime in this case. If MG gets couple of more picks and picks players without reaching too much, the 2023 draft class will get everything they need from the organization to succeed. Even though I grew up in the DW era and mostly got interested in drafting in DWJr era, I really like that those days are over now, it was time to move on.
I agree. Just look at our AHL team, guys would go in highly touted and exit without ever becoming an NHLer
 

Sharkz4Fun

Registered User
Feb 8, 2023
864
867
I agree. Just look at our AHL team, guys would go in highly touted and exit without ever becoming an NHLer
Unfortunately that's what kinda happened this year under MG/JM as well. Nobody really took a step forward arguably other than Gus, Eklund stayed course and everybody else kind of disappointed, and the Barracuda were supposed to be more exciting than ever this year. I'm not sure MG has the right development team in place yet either, but again, you have to draft players with something to develop too. Even all the goalies they tried this year disappointed:laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad