Kelly McCrimmon's moves were seen as unreasonable at the time, now he has a Cup to call his own.
I get the competitiveness sentiment obviously but your take seems so zero-sum - either compete for the cup or nothing else. Isn’t that what DW was going for, even while the wheels were falling off and he was still trying to be competitive?
Grier has already said things like ‘taking a step back before you can move forward’ and ‘doing this the right way without shortcuts’ - he is clearly taking a more long-term approach to building the next competitive Sharks team, and I’m not even reading between the lines here.
It seems weird to me that he has stated his plan, is clearly executing this plan, the plan isn’t a wild idea (draft and develop, run out bad contracts, rebuild team identity into a playoff performer) and yet your applying your very black and white ‘compete for the cup every season’ view that doesn’t at all match his stated approach (or the realities of the situation considering you are comparing the Sharks current predicament to the Vegas expansion draft) and then saying he’s doing a bad job.
It’s like continuing to put all your money into stocks during a recession with the reasoning being ‘gotta make that money’ and losing it all because you aren’t adapting to the realities of the situation.
Not a mean-spirited chirp, honestly, just I don’t understand these really rigid views that don’t properly take into account the details and realities of the circumstance and then talk down about the work someone is trying to do. It feels unfair and out of touch