GiveYouABagOfPucks
Registered User
- Jan 29, 2015
- 329
- 146
Slow non physical and getting less offensive opportunities with Klingberg now here? Yes please!Fowler-Klingberg
Vaakanainen-Drysdale
Kulikov-Benoit
Trade Shattenkirk now?
Slow non physical and getting less offensive opportunities with Klingberg now here? Yes please!Fowler-Klingberg
Vaakanainen-Drysdale
Kulikov-Benoit
Trade Shattenkirk now?
Wait for martinez or Chichcrun to be moved bub... Calm down Logan!!You said they will trade for Chychrun or Martinez. Still waiting for either one, bub.
View attachment 580586
HF be hostile.. jeezI mean you were wrong though..... interesting time to floss lol
I like our defensemen a lot better than how we ended the season, but I don't like the combinations (handiness, play style, etc.) of defensemen we have if that makes sense.
I’ve been a fan of trading Shattenkirk for a while now, but sadly he’s still needed, as he’s our bed right handed defenseman for the Pk. I’d be on board for trading him and adding another defensive defenseman though.
I never understood the Shatty signing. Hopefully he gets traded at the deadline as well.
Not a fan of carrying 8 D. Waive Mahura, he will probably clear and San Diego could use him.Doubt we move Shatty right now. The way I see it is:
Fowler- Klingberg
Kulikov-Drysdale
Vaaks/Benoit-Shatty
Vaaks/Benoit
Mahura
Run with 8
This soft D core could use a Sutton or Brookbank.It reminds me of the 10-11 season, when we had guys like Lilja, Sutton, Mikkelson, Syvret, Brookbank, but I don’t think Klinberg will have a 10-11 Lubo season. Nor do we have a Lydman.
I'm not really against it. Could always use one of then at forward on occasion as well.Not a fan of carrying 8 D. Waive Mahura, he will probably clear and San Diego could use him.
This soft D core could use a Sutton or Brookbank.
I mean Fowler and Shattenkirk were basically playing almost the entire PK after the TDL.Some things I was not aware of before today:
Last year, Shattenkirk AVERAGED (a bit) more TOI on the PK than Lindholm.
Perhaps it was the fact that we were stronger on the left side (Folwer), but still.
Simon Benoit was 52nd in the NHL in hits last year. He didn't even play a full season or that much TOI.
Yeah, that inflated their minutes to make it seem like that was the case throughout the season more than it actually was.I mean Fowler and Shattenkirk were basically playing almost the entire PK after the TDL.
I never understood the Shatty signing. Hopefully he gets traded at the deadline as well.
I mean Fowler and Shattenkirk were basically playing almost the entire PK after the TDL.
Shattenkirk averaged 2:10 up until TDL and 2:19 after the TDL. Not much changed.Yeah, that inflated their minutes to make it seem like that was the case throughout the season more than it actually was.
I would expect Drysdale to get increasingly more minutes as well. But overall, we look pretty damn scary (in a bad way) on the PK defense.PK will likely be a combination of..
Kulikov, Shatty, Fowler, and Vaak/Benoit
Kulikov will eat up a lot of the mins and Fowler should get some relief on the PK. Which will go a long way for his ES and PP time.
PK will likely be a combination of..
Kulikov, Shatty, Fowler, and Vaak/Benoit
Kulikov will eat up a lot of the mins and Fowler should get some relief on the PK. Which will go a long way for his ES and PP time.
Hasn't Fowler played the right side before? Maybe he and Kulikov swap spots? That is under the assumption he's good enough defensively.PK1: Fowler-Shatt
PK2: Vaaks/Benoit-Kulikov
I don't know if Fowler will get relief and I don't expect him to get that much relief from the PK unit. In signing Klingberg, Fowler can focus on playing defense and Klingberg takes over the offensive role on the PP.
Things can change if Kulikov's defense is solid, then he can eat up more PK time. Maybe a Benoit-Kulikov could be a good surprise PK pairing?
Hasn't Fowler played the right side before? Maybe he and Kulikov swap spots? That is under the assumption he's good enough defensively.