Can I ask something?
Why the ardent defense of really anything to do with the team? It's a pattern. Honest question, because it really has a vibe of just seeking attention. If I'm wrong I'd legit be intrigued to know.
More a reaction to knee jerk criticism of everything. I mean the assumption that Sedlak is leaving b/c of Torts (who he played for three years) or losing (half the league plays on losing teams and don't take off half-way through the season) reflects blind hatred, not reasoned thinking.
I was against the Risto trade and extension as much as anyone - but that horse is dead and skinned, and the carcass boiled.
Didn't think the Ghost move was good, but still don't think of it as a big deal, still think he's a 3rd pair, PP specialist. And you're not extending him at 30. So only the pick matters.
The other moves people get excited about? Ho hum. Which is why I don't understand the big deal.
Voracek for Atkinson, damaged goods for damaged goods, same money.
Patrick and Myers for Ellis, bad luck but the Flyers lose only some offseason flexibility which they won't need (i.e. they have no business signing big money FAs)
TDA? A gamble they may lose, but we'll see, it's not even half-way through the season.
NAK or MacEwen? Who cares?
Deslauriers, overpay which I said so, but not a move that will tie Briere's hands (easier to bury than Weise)
So I don't think Fletcher did a good job, but he didn't dig a deep hole for his successor, they're out (2) 2nd rd picks, have an extra 1st rd pick and a couple middle round picks the next two years. By 2025 (do you think they'll be competitive before then?) they should have worked their way out of most the veteran contracts. So nothing that can't be fixed if they take a long-run approach.
The real key is the FO committing to a rebuild and allowing the next GM to do whatever is needed to further the process.
That matters far more than minor moves.