2022/23 Roster Thread XI: Konecny, So Hot Right Now, Konecny

Status
Not open for further replies.

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,260
7,527
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
Fletcher is not capable of getting value for JVR. Or anyone. All he does is lose. The whole league knows he's weak.
You’re correct that Fletcher has been bent over in the past. At this point he should be well aware that his future lies in breaking that pattern. If he blows some deals along with this club being a lottery qualifier, his ass should be heading down the road.
 

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,308
157,004
Pennsylvania
Fletcher is not capable of getting value for JVR. Or anyone. All he does is lose. The whole league knows he's weak.
The guy he paid a borderline 1st round pick to get rid of is currently 1st in defensemen scoring, by the way.

On the worst offensive team in the league.

All goals (2) or primary assists (3) too.

With less games played than the guys immediately behind him.

That’s the kind of GM Fletcher is.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,707
161,280
Huron of the Lakes
Fletcher is not capable of getting value for JVR. Or anyone. All he does is lose. The whole league knows he's weak.

I for one am very interested to see how JVR will go from requiring a high 2023 1st to dump……to being traded for a 1st rounder. How could such a player have less than zero value months earlier? Is that good management to tank a useful player’s value that much? And with the bar set as a 1st in return, will it be good management when he doesn’t get that?
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,562
171,401
Armored Train
You’re correct that Fletcher has been bent over in the past. At this point he should be well aware that his future lies in breaking that pattern. If he blows some deals along with this club being a lottery qualifier, his ass should be heading down the road.

Putting the team in a position to have to deal Giroux and also lose the trade badly should have seen him fired by close of business the same day.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,562
171,401
Armored Train
I for one am very interested to see how JVR will go from requiring a high 2023 1st to dump……to being traded for a 1st rounder. How could such a player have less than zero value months earlier? Is that good management to tank a useful player’s value that much? And with the bar set as a 1st in return, will it be good management when he doesn’t get that?

Sometimes I think players like JVR and MacEwen are a great test to see who can actually evaluate players. Fascinating that the people who are wrong about the one overlap heavily with the people wrong about the other.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,134
22,264
Putting the team in a position to have to deal Giroux and also lose the trade badly should have seen him fired by close of business the same day.
You have never shown me a comparable trade, for a rental forward who had 42 points in 57 games.
If you want to claim "lose the trade badly," show a comparable trade (not an elite forward like Stone who Vegas extended).

I for one am very interested to see how JVR will go from requiring a high 2023 1st to dump……to being traded for a 1st rounder. How could such a player have less than zero value months earlier? Is that good management to tank a useful player’s value that much? And with the bar set as a 1st in return, will it be good management when he doesn’t get that?
Duh. The cap. In October, you're taking on a full contract for a 33 year old forward who you don't know will fall off the cliff.

In March you're taking on half the remaining money (maybe nothing if the Flyers take a contract back), for a player for whom you have recent game film and can gauge whether he's still a top offensive performer.
 

JojoTheWhale

"You should keep it." -- Striiker
May 22, 2008
36,006
111,243
Duh. The cap. In October, you're taking on a full contract for a 33 year old forward who you don't know will fall off the cliff.

In March you're taking on half the remaining money (maybe nothing if the Flyers take a contract back), for a player for whom you have recent game film and can gauge whether he's still a top offensive performer.

Fletcher is the one who insisted on dumping the whole salary. They could have retained or taken a contract back in July too.

What would change about having recent game film when he played all 82 games last year? Unless we're saying some teams won't pass the threshold of understanding the bare minimums of year to year variance. Then I'm totally on board. Let's rip some more bad orgs! Where's Chiarelli now? We can start there.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,134
22,264
Fletcher is the one who insisted on dumping the whole salary. They could have retained or taken a contract back in July too.

What would change about having recent game film when he played all 82 games last year? Unless we're saying some teams won't pass the threshold of understanding the bare minimums of year to year variance. Then I'm totally on board. Let's rip some more bad orgs! Where's Chiarelli now? We can start there.
When you're talking players in their 30s, last year can't be trusted - players often fall off the cliff after a good season.

When is hard to know, playing well last year increases the odds you'll play well this year, but those odds still aren't great in your 30s, at some point players "die." Aging curves may be continuous, but individual players tend to be variable.

By March you know if the player is still performing at a high level, and is healthy, two big questions with older players.
 

JojoTheWhale

"You should keep it." -- Striiker
May 22, 2008
36,006
111,243
When you're talking players in their 30s, last year can't be trusted - players often fall off the cliff after a good season.

When is hard to know, playing well last year increases the odds you'll play well this year, but those odds still aren't great in your 30s, at some point players "die." Aging curves may be continuous, but individual players tend to be variable.

By March you know if the player is still performing at a high level, and is healthy, two big questions with older players.

The flip side of this is that you get the benefit of having the guy for the full season. I suspect that what you’re saying is exactly what many teams think. Sometimes it will even be undeniably smart. But on the whole, just get the guy for more games and you’ll come out ahead in the long run.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,134
22,264
The flip side of this is that you get the benefit of having the guy for the full season. I suspect that what you’re saying is exactly what many teams think. Sometimes it will even be undeniably smart. But on the whole, just get the guy for more games and you’ll come out ahead in the long run.
Yes and No. The marginal value of the player depends on the situation of the team, if injuries, etc. cause them to drop out of playoff contention, then adding a player at the start of the season ends up with zero value - whereas by the TDL you have a better idea of the potential value of a rental to winning this season, especially towards going deep into the playoffs.

Now I think TDL trades get overvalued due to the winner's curse and the difficulty of integrating a player into your top 6/PP with only 20 games left in the season - which is why many of the best TDL trade are low cost acquisitions of bottom six/3rd pair guys that allow you to promote your own players in case of injury and replace them with a suitable veteran.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,562
171,401
Armored Train
Yes and No. The marginal value of the player depends on the situation of the team, if injuries, etc. cause them to drop out of playoff contention, then adding a player at the start of the season ends up with zero value - whereas by the TDL you have a better idea of the potential value of a rental to winning this season, especially towards going deep into the playoffs.

Now I think TDL trades get overvalued due to the winner's curse and the difficulty of integrating a player into your top 6/PP with only 20 games left in the season - which is why many of the best TDL trade are low cost acquisitions of bottom six/3rd pair guys that allow you to promote your own players in case of injury and replace them with a suitable veteran.

Weird how you don't want to apply this level of context to certain other players. Yet you're proving that you can if you want to. Hmm.
 

Captain Dave Poulin

Imaginary Cat
Sponsor
Apr 30, 2015
68,605
201,366
Tokyo, JP
Kevin Hayes should always be on a line with vets. Amirite? WOOF!

4WrKvVV.jpg


tl;dr he's high-end f***ing trash.
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,997
45,426
We got a 4th for Brassard, so a 2nd or 3rd for JVR at 50% should be possible. Maybe even send him thru an extra team so the team getting him gets him at 25%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,134
22,264
Listed by Total TOI:

Farabee (22), Hayes, TK (25), JVR, N Cates (23), Laughton, Frost (23), Allison (25), Laczynski (25), Deslauriers, MacEwen, J Cates (25)
cameos: Lycksell (23), Hodgson, Tippett (23)

Provorov (26), TDA (27), Sanheim (26), Braun, Zamula (22), Seeler
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,997
45,426
Farabee would probably benefit from a little less ice time given the summer he had.

I wonder when the GM is going to update us on how Atkin and Risto are coming along. We basically know the story with Coots and Ellis, but there's those two other big money injuries that they are keeping very quiet about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad