I believe Verbeek had no intention of trying to build a strong defense this season. He wanted a high draft pick. Eakins has had 6 years of NHL head coaching futility. Acting like he should be brought back because Ducks are beating teams that are tanking harder than they are is funny to me.
Defense wasn't a priority for Verbeek. Forwards Vatrano and Strome were signed early in FA period while D Klingberg was signed just before August. But Verbeek did acquire the cap dump of D Kulikov at the end of August. Also had Beaulieu added on Oct 1 after Vaaks' injury.
While I do believe Verbeek didn't value defense, PV did value stock in both forwards Vatrano and Strome. This is why I believe PV thought we'd be around or at .500 with the notion the forwards would be strong enough to mask the defense like a Florida team. That part has failed.
As for Eakins, his four seasons with the Ducks have all been in the rebuild era. The team first rebuild started gutting at the 2018-19 TDL. Next season, the team was gutted once again at the TDL, but it did bring in the youths Zegras and Drysdale. The third season, everyone was healthy to start the season. New mgmt didn't give up and gutted the team to reset the rebuild. This season, his fourth with the Ducks, is an obvious rebuild season.
I really can't knock Eakins when most of his tenure with the Ducks have been with weak rosters that are often maligned with mass injuries. The only time Eakins had a healthy roster with talent, he produced well while it lasted. It's kinda sad to acknowledge three of the top-4 scorers for the team right now are all youths, with one of them a 19-year old rookie. That's how much the Ducks lack talent. On the plus side, all three youths are there with Eakins as coach.
I'm indifferent if the Ducks retain Eakins, but i won't bash the guy when he's been given lemons for most of his tenure. I stand by what I think the Ducks are this season, "a bad roster that overachieves."