2022/23 Roster Thread II: Worth Every Penny

Status
Not open for further replies.

BiggE

SELL THE DAMN TEAM
Jan 4, 2019
25,090
65,851
Somewhere, FL
I forgot about the Gratton thing. The signing and then the reversal of the move was absurd.

Everyone knew the Flyers were signing a goalie and everyone assumed it was Cujo and then of course they signed Beezer and disappointed everyone.

The Flyers, red wings, devils, avs, and stars were basically the 5 team power structure then but it seemed like the other 4 were more aggressive. And course the Flyers were lowe team on that totem pole.

And the aggressive moves they did make were idiotic like trading firsts for Falloon and then Prospal and a first for Daigle. They never made the right move.
Their big defensive upgrade during the Lindros era was Luke Richardson but they traded Yushevich a couple of yrs earlier because Clarke didn't like him

and I agree, it seemed like they were more into player development than they are during this era when you have to have player development.

The ultimate point is that this team hasn't been well managed since at least Clarke's first tenure as GM during the 80's/ After looking at the drafts and the trades, I'd say Bob Mccammon was the last competent manager in this organization. However, Mccammon was just before my time ( I started watching in 85) and I remember hearing people bash Mccammon..... maybe that was typical Philly impatience.
McCammon drafted well but was not shrewd when it came to trades and he was a flat out horrific coach.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

Adam Warlock

Registered User
Apr 15, 2006
7,050
6,963
I could see them do it. They mostly have a team right now and a 1 year pull on JVR to bring in a really low pick could be big for the Flyers.
Get a first to take on JVR... let him rack up points playing with kane... trade him at the deadline for another 1st.

Blackhawks doing it right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flyerfan4life

Diaper Mask Bandits

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
269
580
McCammon drafted well but was not shrewd when it came to trades and he was a flat out horrific coach.

i thought mccammon could have been a good trader because didn't he get Howe... I guess that was his only good trade.. Or was Murray Craven a Clarke move?

weren't Tim Kerr and Dave poulin undrafted FA's?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE

BiggE

SELL THE DAMN TEAM
Jan 4, 2019
25,090
65,851
Somewhere, FL
i thought mccammon could have been a good trader because didn't he get Howe... I guess that was his only good trade.. Or was Murray Craven a Clarke move?

weren't Tim Kerr and Dave poulin undrafted FA's?
Keith Allen was still GM when Howe was acquired, and Clarke made the Craven deal. Also Kerr, Sinisalo and Poulin were all signed while Allen was GM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diaper Mask Bandits

Diaper Mask Bandits

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
269
580
crap, I just read the newspaper article from 1984 when Mccammon was fired.

It said the Flyers wanted him to give up coaching but remain as GM. Mccammon refused.

What if he accepted that ultimatum? Clarke wouldn't have been hired as GM........ the history of the organization could have been much better.... maybe that 80s team doesn't descend into rot by 1990,

Another instance where the team takes the wrong turn
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,385
143,432
Philadelphia, PA
FXgMoJuX0AIT0NT


200.gif
 

Diaper Mask Bandits

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
269
580
Keith Allen was still GM when Howe was acquired, and Clarke made the Craven deal. Also Kerr, Sinisalo and Poulin were all signed while Allen was GM.

ok, i see. it says Allen retired in 83. For some reason, I thought it was earlier.

So, I'm giving Mcammon too much credit.

Still, he couldn't have been worse than Clarke after 87
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,059
22,234
This sounds more and more like the rumor posted above, that Fletcher wants to rebuild but is being blocked by Clarke and Holmgren, may have some legs. This is why Fletcher isn't rushing to trade a 1st rd pick to clear JVR, why he's moving 2nd and 3rd rd picks, trying to limit the damage from the "bias for action" mandate - same thing he did in the summer of 2019. That summer he managed to satisfy the mandate but only gave up a net 3rd rd pick, regaining the 2nd in the draft, and Gudas. Last summer, the pressure was on to give AV what he thought he needed to win. This summer, the pressure is on again, another "name" HC, another push to the playoffs.

Beef says Fletcher is in control, I don't believe it for a minute. These moves feel like decisions being made by committee, a lot of "camels." As far as Fletcher resigning, uh, these jobs are hard to find, this could be his last real payday in his life - I'd hang on as long as I could in his situation - because those houses by the golf course are expensive. :cool:

Nothing is going to change until they fire Scott and bring in someone with real sports management experience and expertise. It doesn't even have to be a Hockey guy, just someone who does his homework, identifies the best available hockey people with 21st century mindsets and give them carte blanche to build a team for the long run. Only then will moves be made that are coherent.

What we see right now are a series of reactive moves, try this to make the playoffs, it didn't work, dump those players and add others, that didn't work . . . the lack of coherence tells me no one is in charge.

Fletcher did build Minnesota into a winner, made a couple initial mistakes but built through the draft. Then his owner started pushing to win now leading to a serious of TDL trades that leaked talent. We've just seen exactly the same thing with Zito in Florida, trading their top picks the next three seasons to get blown out in the 2nd round. Sakic isn't brilliant, he's just lucky to have a FO that allowed him to keep his job after deep sixing a 112 point team to 48 points in three years and patiently build it back up again. He's made some good moves, but the best was having the right owner.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,677
161,122
Huron of the Lakes
This sounds more and more like the rumor posted above, that Fletcher wants to rebuild but is being blocked by Clarke and Holmgren, may have some legs. This is why Fletcher isn't rushing to trade a 1st rd pick to clear JVR, why he's moving 2nd and 3rd rd picks, trying to limit the damage from the "bias for action" mandate - same thing he did in the summer of 2019. That summer he managed to satisfy the mandate but only gave up a net 3rd rd pick, regaining the 2nd in the draft, and Gudas. Last summer, the pressure was on to give AV what he thought he needed to win. This summer, the pressure is on again, another "name" HC, another push to the playoffs.

Beef says Fletcher is in control, I don't believe it for a minute. These moves feel like decisions being made by committee, a lot of "camels." As far as Fletcher resigning, uh, these jobs are hard to find, this could be his last real payday in his life - I'd hang on as long as I could in his situation - because those houses by the golf course are expensive. :cool:

Nothing is going to change until they fire Scott and bring in someone with real sports management experience and expertise. It doesn't even have to be a Hockey guy, just someone who does his homework, identifies the best available hockey people with 21st century mindsets and give them carte blanche to build a team for the long run. Only then will moves be made that are coherent.

What we see right now are a series of reactive moves, try this to make the playoffs, it didn't work, dump those players and add others, that didn't work . . . the lack of coherence tells me no one is in charge.

Fletcher did build Minnesota into a winner, made a couple initial mistakes but built through the draft. Then his owner started pushing to win now leading to a serious of TDL trades that leaked talent. We've just seen exactly the same thing with Zito in Florida, trading their top picks the next three seasons to get blown out in the 2nd round. Sakic isn't brilliant, he's just lucky to have a FO that allowed him to keep his job after deep sixing a 112 point team to 48 points in three years and patiently build it back up again. He's made some good moves, but the best was having the right owner.

Stop. Please.

If Fletcher is even here beyond this season, desperate as he is to keep his job, only more disaster awaits.
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,735
23,525
Chicagoland
This sounds more and more like the rumor posted above, that Fletcher wants to rebuild but is being blocked by Clarke and Holmgren, may have some legs. This is why Fletcher isn't rushing to trade a 1st rd pick to clear JVR, why he's moving 2nd and 3rd rd picks, trying to limit the damage from the "bias for action" mandate - same thing he did in the summer of 2019. That summer he managed to satisfy the mandate but only gave up a net 3rd rd pick, regaining the 2nd in the draft, and Gudas. Last summer, the pressure was on to give AV what he thought he needed to win. This summer, the pressure is on again, another "name" HC, another push to the playoffs.

Beef says Fletcher is in control, I don't believe it for a minute. These moves feel like decisions being made by committee, a lot of "camels." As far as Fletcher resigning, uh, these jobs are hard to find, this could be his last real payday in his life - I'd hang on as long as I could in his situation - because those houses by the golf course are expensive. :cool:

Nothing is going to change until they fire Scott and bring in someone with real sports management experience and expertise. It doesn't even have to be a Hockey guy, just someone who does his homework, identifies the best available hockey people with 21st century mindsets and give them carte blanche to build a team for the long run. Only then will moves be made that are coherent.

What we see right now are a series of reactive moves, try this to make the playoffs, it didn't work, dump those players and add others, that didn't work . . . the lack of coherence tells me no one is in charge.

Fletcher did build Minnesota into a winner, made a couple initial mistakes but built through the draft. Then his owner started pushing to win now leading to a serious of TDL trades that leaked talent. We've just seen exactly the same thing with Zito in Florida, trading their top picks the next three seasons to get blown out in the 2nd round. Sakic isn't brilliant, he's just lucky to have a FO that allowed him to keep his job after deep sixing a 112 point team to 48 points in three years and patiently build it back up again. He's made some good moves, but the best was having the right owner.

If this was case, then why would Fletcher not resign?

His reputation is going down tubes while he is the "Victim" and being "Forced" into these moves according to your viewpoint

Looks like you're doing everything you can to defend Fletcher

And when you add up assets, he trades away its thinning out Flyer's future piece by piece even if he holds onto a couple of 1sts

And since he traded a 1st for Ristolainen that would sorta show our "He doesn't want to trade 1st's" argument to be well wrong
 
Feb 19, 2003
67,917
25,982
Concord, New Hampshire
I forgot about the Gratton thing. The signing and then the reversal of the move was absurd.

Everyone knew the Flyers were signing a goalie and everyone assumed it was Cujo and then of course they signed Beezer and disappointed everyone.

The Flyers, red wings, devils, avs, and stars were basically the 5 team power structure then but it seemed like the other 4 were more aggressive. And course the Flyers were lowe team on that totem pole.

And the aggressive moves they did make were idiotic like trading firsts for Falloon and then Prospal and a first for Daigle. They never made the right move.
Their big defensive upgrade during the Lindros era was Luke Richardson but they traded Yushevich a couple of yrs earlier because Clarke didn't like him

and I agree, it seemed like they were more into player development than they are during this era when you have to have player development.

The ultimate point is that this team hasn't been well managed since at least Clarke's first tenure as GM during the 80's/ After looking at the drafts and the trades, I'd say Bob Mccammon was the last competent manager in this organization. However, Mccammon was just before my time ( I started watching in 85) and I remember hearing people bash Mccammon..... maybe that was typical Philly impatience.
lol? That Daigle trade.
Forgot about that
 

Danko

The Bearer of Bad Knees
Jul 28, 2004
11,554
11,568
I won’t hate it when he signs, until I see the contract and subsequent moves to clear out salary while still somehow upgrading the 2nd/3rd lines
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,059
22,234
Stop. Please.

If Fletcher is even here beyond this season, desperate as he is to keep his job, only more disaster awaits.
If anyone of those four are here beyond this season, more disaster awaits.
You think Scott, Clarke and Holmgren would approve a rebuild?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad