2022/23 Roster Thread II: Worth Every Penny

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,340
160,708
South Jersey
i don't disagree with Deadhead's overarching point in that Clarke, Holmgren, Lombardi are huge in mandating the overall direction and that Fletcher is basically implementing their vision.

However, Fletcher is still an incompetent idiot and I doubt he wants to do a proper rebuild
The point is that we all agree that they all suck. We just don’t post pages upon pages absolving Chuck Fletcher of any and all blame. Fletcher is cut from the same cloth. He agrees with everything they say.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,059
22,234
Damn, sounds like he’s shitty at his job if you asked me and in no way shape or form worthy of pages and pages of defense.
It's never been about defending Fletcher, but exposing the reality that firing Fletcher changes nothing if Scott, Clarke and Holmgren are in place - they'll just hire another GM with a "bias for action." Wash, rinse, repeat. Have to do things the "Flyer way."

What makes a GM brilliant in most cases is situational - a patient owner with deep pockets that allows a GM to take the long view and focus on value, not short-term results. So you can take advantage of opportunities to add value even when they hurt the team in the short-run, and you're not asked to make moves with ticket sales in mind.
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,340
160,708
South Jersey
It's never been about defending Fletcher, but exposing the reality that firing Fletcher changes nothing if Scott, Clarke and Holmgren are in place - they'll just hire another GM with a "bias for action." Wash, rinse, repeat. Have to do things the "Flyer way."

What makes a GM brilliant in most cases is situational - a patient owner with deep pockets that allows a GM to take the long view and focus on value, not short-term results. So you can take advantage of opportunities to add value even when they hurt the team in the short-run, and you're not asked to make moves with ticket sales in mind.
And none of us have argued otherwise other then stating that Dave Scott isn’t as involved as you believe. We’ve stated that Fletcher has been horrendous at his job given that mandate which you take personally and defend everything Chuck does as if he’s your father.
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,994
45,414
It's never been about defending Fletcher, but exposing the reality that firing Fletcher changes nothing if Scott, Clarke and Holmgren are in place - they'll just hire another GM with a "bias for action." Wash, rinse, repeat. Have to do things the "Flyer way."

What makes a GM brilliant in most cases is situational - a patient owner with deep pockets that allows a GM to take the long view and focus on value, not short-term results. So you can take advantage of opportunities to add value even when they hurt the team in the short-run, and you're not asked to make moves with ticket sales in mind.
How come you never said anything about Scott or Holmgren or Clarke when the team was doing well in 19-20?
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,385
143,432
Philadelphia, PA
The point is that we all agree that they all suck. We just don’t post pages upon pages absolving Chuck Fletcher of any and all blame. Fletcher is cut from the same cloth. He agrees with everything they say.

Fletcher got his start in Florida under Clarke. Clarke & Homer worked together for a long time. Lombardi worked under Clarke & Homer during his first stint with the Flyers before he left for LA.

These guys are all like minded individuals because they all come from the same bubble. That’s why Fletcher got the job in the first place. It’s why nobody will be surprised if Fletcher gets kicked upstairs when they feel he’s not longer fit to do the job which is probably approaching soon.
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,242
87,031
Nova Scotia
The point is that we all agree that they all suck. We just don’t post pages upon pages absolving Chuck Fletcher of any and all blame. Fletcher is cut from the same cloth. He agrees with everything they say.
Yup.

Being you'd the team is not rebuilding does not mean that the GM has to bleed asset after asset trying to get better. Look at the Canes as an example.
 

Columbus Hockey Dad

Registered User
Oct 30, 2018
1,045
1,502
Even if they gave Fletcher a mandate to win now, I don’t think the mandate was to acquire mostly shit players.

I’ve done this ten times, but Fletcher has never ever been about building through the draft.
And that’s kind of a problem for Fletcher. Either he’s supposed to do an aggressive retool and is failing miserably by making the defense worse and mishandling the cap so badly that he can’t sign the best free agent on the market who actually wants to come here. Or, he’s supposed to rebuild but hasn’t dropped any salary or veterans. Hey sucks ass either way you slice it, folks.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,059
22,234
And none of us have argued otherwise other then stating that Dave Scott isn’t as involved as you believe. We’ve stated that Fletcher has been horrendous at his job given that mandate which you take personally and defend everything Chuck does as if he’s your father.
I don't think he's been horrible, he's been mediocre, but so would be just about any GM put in this situation.
And we see the same bad moves all over the NHL, Hextall just overpaid Rakell, St Louis gave Schenn an awful extension, and so on.

How many owners are both smart enough and patient enough to say:
1) we're stagnant, let's take a couple years and reload
2) let's not chase a playoff spot at the TDL and grossly overpay
3) let's take a chance on a young and upcoming HC instead of a 2nd tier retread

I don't think most NHL GMs are stone idiots, I think a lot of times they're pressured to make short-term moves. The owners want bragging rights and seats filled, and lack any vision.
Their attitude is probably "apres me le deluge" because most will be fired in 3-4 years, so cross your fingers, hope things work out and you buy another year or two - and save every penny if you have any common sense.
 

Strawberry Fields

12x Calder Cup Champs
Sep 29, 2017
9,152
29,567
Central PA
Imagine if, last summer, they had instead kept Ghost, aimed for someone like Manson (yes, nitpickers, I know he had a clause) instead of Risto, and not acquired $6m of dead cap for the rest of time in Ellis

And perhaps dumped the French brigade and tried hiring someone who doesn't ride a foot-powered stone car to the arena. But that last bit might've been a bit too much to ask.

The team probably still sucks, but they keep their 22/23 2nds and possibly add another if Robert and co allows Manson/whoever to be traded
 
  • Like
Reactions: renberg

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,340
160,708
South Jersey
I don't think he's been horrible, he's been mediocre, but so would be just about any GM put in this situation.
And we see the same bad moves all over the NHL, Hextall just overpaid Rakell, St Louis gave Schenn an awful extension, and so on.

How many owners are both smart enough and patient enough to say:
1) we're stagnant, let's take a couple years and reload
2) let's not chase a playoff spot at the TDL and grossly overpay
3) let's take a chance on a young and upcoming HC instead of a 2nd tier retread

I don't think most NHL GMs are stone idiots, I think a lot of times they're pressured to make short-term moves. The owners want bragging rights and seats filled, and lack any vision.
Their attitude is probably "apres me le deluge" because most will be fired in 3-4 years, so cross your fingers, hope things work out and you buy another year or two - and save every penny if you have any common sense.
We know, it just has no basis in reality.
 

Sombastate

Registered User
Jun 19, 2011
10,802
9,023
Las Vegas
Even if they gave Fletcher a mandate to win now, I don’t think the mandate was to acquire mostly shit players and take a bath on every important decision.

I’ve done this ten times, but Fletcher has never ever been about building through the draft.

That's the only point that matters. Even if it is WIN NOW. A person who had an IQ somewhere above absolute zero would win a trade OCCASIONALLY. The only move he has "won" had Patrick and Myers being traded for Stephen Hawking.
 

Danko

The Bearer of Bad Knees
Jul 28, 2004
11,554
11,568
chuck almost has to go get Johnny and give up assets at this point. Otherwise your alternative for your aggressive retool is overpriced kadri, Malkin(not happening) or running it back (probably the best option) but waiving Oskar and getting tony d make that very unlikely.
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,385
143,432
Philadelphia, PA
Look how it ended for all four with their last GM jobs. All four completely burnt a hole through their pockets in capspace & assets on horrendous moves that didn’t even need hindsight. The most successful of the bunch in Lombardi got himself fired shortly after winning two cups because his unwillingness to make smart moves to get around the cap & extend his team’s window more. Even in the NHL where that type of success in one place usually buys yourself right or wrong some shelf & he still f***ed that up.
 

Psuhockey

Registered User
Nov 17, 2010
6,377
2,286
chuck almost has to go get Johnny and give up assets at this point. Otherwise your alternative for your aggressive retool is overpriced kadri, Malkin(not happening) or running it back (probably the best option) but waiving Oskar and getting tony d make that very unlikely.
They have no choice but to sign Gaudreau. What are they selling otherwise to get fans back into the building? I doubt Gaudreau is even enough outside a couple of months, but without him they have Tortorella and a guy half the fanbase thinks is a racist. Good luck selling tickets with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danko
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad