BrindamoursNose
Registered User
- Oct 14, 2008
- 20,405
- 14,553
Again..not a real rumor. Made up by clowns on Facebook. Please distinguish.
Wasn't that made by EvilGritty?
Again..not a real rumor. Made up by clowns on Facebook. Please distinguish.
Wasn't that made by EvilGritty?
Don't forget JVR at 50% retainedSaw a rumor that the Flyers offered
2022 1st
2023 1st
2024 1st
2024 1st (FLA)
2025 2nd
2026 2nd
Frost
Brink
Foerster
Konecny
Sanheim
Hart
Gritty
Kevin Hayes' firstborn
Zack MacEwen's moustache
Ed Snider's corpse
for
Debrincat
Any truth?
I think issue is the 2nd major piece back
If speculation about Hawks rejecting a high 1st + 1st and player/prospect is true, then it likely was Flyers (IMO) offering 5th + Panthers and someone like Ratcliffe
For Hawks the 5th is appealing, and the likely late Panthers 1st has value but not great value. Ratcliffe to me as an outsider looks like a pretty underwhelming talent at this point from time in AHL and NHL (You guys may disagree)
If a trade is going to happen between teams involving Debrincat the likely asset upgrade will require either Flyers 2023 or RW Bobby Brink to be in deal which likely are what Flyers are not willing to do
Hawks are not willing to give away Debrincat for one high value asset (5th overall) given his pedigree and age at this point
I think you are spot on here.I think issue is the 2nd major piece back
If speculation about Hawks rejecting a high 1st + 1st and player/prospect is true, then it likely was Flyers (IMO) offering 5th + Panthers and someone like Ratcliffe
For Hawks the 5th is appealing, and the likely late Panthers 1st has value but not great value. Ratcliffe to me as an outsider looks like a pretty underwhelming talent at this point from time in AHL and NHL (You guys may disagree)
If a trade is going to happen between teams involving Debrincat the likely asset upgrade will require either Flyers 2023 or RW Bobby Brink to be in deal which likely are what Flyers are not willing to do
Hawks are not willing to give away Debrincat for one high value asset (5th overall) given his pedigree and age at this point
I think people are underestimating just how against the grain this rumored Debrincat trade would be. Can anyone name the last time an NHL team knowingly traded a top 5 pick that wasn’t chiefly for another pick in the same 1st round?
As near as I can tell, it was Joni Pitkanen in 2002. But even that had two 2nds coming back in addition to Fedotenko.
Before that, you had Kevin Weekes + Kristian Krudoc + a 2 for 5OA in 2000. You also had the Sedin machinations the previous year, but those also involved picks.
In order to find a straight up trade of a known top 5 pick (with or without other assets) for a vet, you’ve got to go back to the Kings trading 4 and 85 for Byron Dafoe (and Dmitri Khristich). That’s so long ago that Eric Lindros had played less than 200 NHL games.
I realized this last week when I was trying to compare the value of trading down in the 1st from the Top 10.
It was clear Top 10 picks aren't traded unless for a roster player (like Corey Schneider), but Top 5 picks are basically never ever traded.
I figured out a much better way of describing the timeline involved here. The last strict comp happened 10 days after the NHL’s first crop of unrestricted free agents hit the market. Forget the cap. Free agency was brand new.
Joel Otto was still 6 days away from signing with the Flyers out of that class.
Is the most notable Top 5 trade ever the 1999 Sedin trades, you think?
Burke wanted them both BAD...
What I think is interesting is that, I can't find any record of what Burke got from Don Waddell (ATL) to downgrade from #1 to #2.
- Bryan McCabe and VAN 2000 1st for #4 overall.
- Then #4 and two 3s for #1 from TB.
- So at this point, VAN had #1 and #3 overall...but Burke wanted #2 instead of #1.
All just so Burke could call the Sedin twins up on stage together at the same time with picks #2 & #3
- From what I can tell, Burke didn't get anything in return other than a promise that ATL wouldn't take either Sedin.
What a wild time.
By strict interpretation of having to know where the pick was at the time of the trade, yes. Without knowing, it would be Montreal getting the Lafleur pick from California.
Atlanta gave up a conditional 3rd the next year to flip from 2 to 1. There's actually video of Burke on the draft floor sorting it out:
Jay Feaster was torn apart in the press by other GMs for that trade. Apparently, many, if not most GMs had no clue pick #4 was available in a draft that was supposed to have four franchise players.I think people are underestimating just how against the grain this rumored Debrincat trade would be. Can anyone name the last time an NHL team knowingly traded a top 5 pick that wasn’t chiefly for another pick in the same 1st round?
As near as I can tell, it was Joni Pitkanen in 2002. But even that had two 2nds coming back in addition to Fedotenko.
Before that, you had Kevin Weekes + Kristian Krudoc + a 2 for 5OA in 2000. You also had the Sedin machinations the previous year, but those also involved picks.
In order to find a straight up trade of a known top 5 pick (with or without other assets) for a vet, you’ve got to go back to the Kings trading 4 and 85 for Byron Dafoe (and Dmitri Khristich). That’s so long ago that Eric Lindros had played less than 200 NHL games.
I would be mortified if the Flyers wanted to trade up in this draft. But I would laugh. Gallows humor and all.